skip to main content
10.1145/1292491.1292510acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Criteria used in selecting effective requirements elicitation procedures

Published: 02 October 2007 Publication History

Abstract

New methods, methodologies and procedures are often introduced within information systems without discussing the effectiveness thereof. We investigate the effectiveness of a requirements elicitation procedure for deriving process model structures. There were three activities that 'rigged' this study before comments were possible on the effectiveness of the requirements elicitation procedure: identification of the characteristics that the procedure adhered to, investigating the usefulness of the procedure, and using the procedure. Each of these activities is discussed. The higher education institution is used as illustrative case domain.

References

[1]
Avison, D., Fitzgerald, G.: Information Systems Development: Methodologies, Techniques and Tools. McGraw-Hill, Berkshire, UK, (2003).
[2]
Bates, A. W.: Effective Teaching with Technology in Higher Education. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, (2003).
[3]
Curtis, B., Kellner, M. I., Over, J.: Process Modeling. Communication of the ACM. 35(9) (1992), 75--90.
[4]
Davenport, T.: Process innovation: reengineering work through information technology. Harvard Business School press, Boston, (1993).
[5]
Davenport, T., Short, J.: The new industrial engineering: Information technology and business redesign. Sloan Management Review. 31(4) (1990), 11--27.
[6]
Eriksson, H.-E., Penker, M.: Business modeling with UML. John Wiley & Sons, New York, (2000).
[7]
Frese, R., Sauter, V.: Project success and failure: What is success, what is failure, and how can you imporve your odds for success? (2003) {cited 3 February 2005}; Available from: http://www.umsl.edu/~rmfv3g/Index.htm#12.
[8]
Goldratt, E., Cox, J.: The goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press, Great Barrington, MA, (1992).
[9]
Green, H., Van der Merwe, A.: System Analysis: Automated Electronic Registration System. 2004, University of South Africa: Pretoria.
[10]
Hammer, M.: Reengineering work: Don't automate, obliterate. Harvard Business Review. 68(4) (1990), 104--113.
[11]
Hammer, M., Champy, J.: Reengineering the Corporation: A Manisfesto for Business Revolution. Harper Business Books, New York, (1994).
[12]
Hickey, A. M., Davis, A. M.: Requirements Elicitations and Elicitation Technique Selection: A model for Two Knowledge-Intensive Software Development Processes. In 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 2003. Hawaii: IEEE.
[13]
Inc, T. P. M.: Process Improvement Project Guide. (2001) {cited June 2001}; Available from: http://www.processmodel.com/Project_Guide.pdf.
[14]
Kawalek, P., Kueng, P.: The usefullness of Process models: A lifecycle description of how process models are used in Modern organizations. In International Workshop on Evaluation of Modeling Methods in Systems Analysis and Design. 1997. Barcelona.
[15]
Kotzé, P., Cloete, E.: Heuristics supporting usable authoring tools: Matching the right tool to the right user. In Sixth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2004). 2004. Portugal.
[16]
Lazenby, K.: Technology and educational innovation: A case study of the virtual campus of the University of Pretoria. Thesis, Teaching and Training Studies, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 2003.
[17]
Lin, F.-R., Yang, M.-C., Pai, Y.-H.: A generic structure for business process modelling. Business Process Management Journal. 8(1) (2002), 19--41.
[18]
Onirik: What is the theory of constraints (TOC). (2000) {cited September 2004}; Available from: http://www.onirik.com.au/Theory%20of%20Constraints%20TOC.htm.
[19]
Porter, M.: Competitive Advantage - Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. The Free Press, New York, (1985).
[20]
Pressman, R. S.: Software Engineering, A Practitioner's Approach. 5 ed. McGraw-Hill International, United Kingdom, (2000).
[21]
Pressman, R. S.: Software Engineering, A Practitioner's Approach. 6 ed. McGraw-Hill International, New York, (2005).
[22]
Rolstadas, A., Andersen, B.: Enterprise Modeling - Improving Global Industrial Competitiveness. Kluwer Academci Publishers, Massachusetts, (2000).
[23]
Singh, H.: Achieving Interoperability in e-Learning. (2000) {cited Accessed April 2003 April 2003}; Available from: www.learningxircuits.org/mar2000/singh.html.
[24]
Snowdown, R. A.: Overview of Process Modelling. (2002) {cited 16 April 2002}; Available from: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/ipg/Docs/pmover.html.
[25]
Sommerville, I.: Software Engineering. 6 ed. Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA, (2000).
[26]
Sparks, G.: The Business Process Model. (2000) {cited 2002 March 2002}; 9}. Available from: www.sparxsystems.com.au.
[27]
Van der Merwe, A.: Towards a Reusable Process Model Structure for Higher Education Institutions (PhD thesis). Thesis, School of Computing, University of South Africa, Pretoria, 2005.
[28]
Van der Merwe, A., Kotzé, P., Cronjé, J.: The functionality of a requirements elicitation procedure developed within the Higher Education domain. Alternation. 12.1b (2005), 489--514.
[29]
Van der Merwe, A., Kotzé, P., Cronjé, J.: The Usefulness of a Generic Process Model Structure. In The Fourth International Workshop on Modelling, Simulation, Verification and Validation of Enterprise Information Systems. 2006. Cyprus.
[30]
Van der Merwe, A., Pretorius, L., Cloete, E.: A requirements elicitation process modelling technique for incorporation of e-learning as a core learning strategy. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science. 8(3) (2004), 1--16.
[31]
Wang, A. I.: Experience Paper: Using XML to implement a workflow tool. In 3rd Annual IASTED International Conference Software Engineering and Applications. 1999. Scotssdale, Arizona, USA: http://www.idi.ntnu.no/grupper/su/publ/pdf/sea99-aiw.pdf.
[32]
Whitten, J. L., Bentley, L. D., Dittman, K. C.: Systems analysis and design methods. 5 ed. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, New York, (2000).

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)The Models for Knowledge Acquisition in PMI Specific Requirements EngineeringThe Practice of Enterprise Modeling10.1007/978-3-030-91279-6_3(34-47)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2021
  • (2011)Evaluating software specifications by comparisonProceedings of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists Conference on Knowledge, Innovation and Leadership in a Diverse, Multidisciplinary Environment10.1145/2072221.2072232(87-96)Online publication date: 3-Oct-2011
  • (2010)A four-way framework for validating a specificationProceedings of the 2010 Annual Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists10.1145/1899503.1899509(48-57)Online publication date: 11-Oct-2010

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
SAICSIT '07: Proceedings of the 2007 annual research conference of the South African institute of computer scientists and information technologists on IT research in developing countries
October 2007
211 pages
ISBN:9781595937759
DOI:10.1145/1292491
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

  • Telcom
  • Microsoft: Microsoft
  • COE

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 02 October 2007

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. process models
  2. requirements elicitation procedures

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

SAICSIT '07
Sponsor:
  • Microsoft

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 187 of 439 submissions, 43%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)The Models for Knowledge Acquisition in PMI Specific Requirements EngineeringThe Practice of Enterprise Modeling10.1007/978-3-030-91279-6_3(34-47)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2021
  • (2011)Evaluating software specifications by comparisonProceedings of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists Conference on Knowledge, Innovation and Leadership in a Diverse, Multidisciplinary Environment10.1145/2072221.2072232(87-96)Online publication date: 3-Oct-2011
  • (2010)A four-way framework for validating a specificationProceedings of the 2010 Annual Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists10.1145/1899503.1899509(48-57)Online publication date: 11-Oct-2010

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media