skip to main content
10.1145/1296843.1296862acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Photonote evaluation: aiding students with disabilities in a lecture environment

Published:15 October 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

Visual material presented in lectures can be enhanced for students with disabilities by using high-resolution digital-still cameras. The Photonote system uses a digital-still camera to capture visual information, a digital-video camera to capture a lecturer and a second digital-video camera to capture a sign-language interpreter, if necessary. The visual information is enhanced using computer-vision algorithms and presented alongside the recorded video and audio to provide an accurate representation of a lecture which can be used by students with disabilities for review purposes. This paper presents the Photonote system and a user study evaluating its effectiveness at aiding students with disabilities in a lecture environment.

References

  1. S. D. Abowd. Classroom 2000: An experiment with the instrumentation of a living educational environment. IBM Systems Journal, Special issue on Pervasive Computing, 38(4):508--530, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Anystream Incorporated. Apreso. Online. http://www.apreso.com/ac_product_overview.asp; Accessed 12 Jul 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Arts Multimedia Centre, The University of Western Australia. Lectopia. Online. http://ilectures.uwa.edu.au/; Accessed 12 Jul 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. AutoAuditorium. Autoauditorium system home page. Online. http://www.autoauditorium.com/; Accessed 16 Aug 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. G. Hughes and P. Robinson. Time-lapse photography as an assistive tool. In Proceedings of the 3rd Cambridge Workshop on Universal Access and Assistive Technology (CWUAAT), pages 87--89, Cambridge, UK, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. S. Mukhopadhyay and B. Smith. Passive capture and structuring of lectures. In MULTIMEDIA '99: Proceedings of the seventh ACM international conference on Multimedia (Part 1), pages 477--487, New York, NY, USA, 1999. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Tegrity Incorporated. Tergrity campus 2.0. Online. http://www.tegrity.com/; Accessed 12 Jul 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. P. D. Wellner. Interacting with paper on the DigitalDesk. Technical Report UCAM-CL-TR-330, University of Cambridge, Computer Laboratory, Mar. 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Photonote evaluation: aiding students with disabilities in a lecture environment

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        Assets '07: Proceedings of the 9th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility
        October 2007
        282 pages
        ISBN:9781595935731
        DOI:10.1145/1296843

        Copyright © 2007 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 15 October 2007

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate436of1,556submissions,28%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader