skip to main content
10.1145/1297277.1297308acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesidcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

How preschool children used a behaviour-based programming tool

Published:06 June 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a study of how five-year-old preschool children used a behaviour-based visual programming toolkit called Magic Words. The system represents behaviours with contextual word pads that are placed on graphical characters. The purpose of the study was to see how the children would use the tool when playing with it in an open-ended way. Our conclusion is that behaviour-based programming with contextual signs has a high level of directness, but support is needed to learn behaviours that do not give instant feedback.

References

  1. Fernaeus, Y., Kindborg, M., Scholz, R. Rethinking Children's Programming with Contextual Signs. Proc. IDC 2006, Tampere, Finland, 2006, pp. 121--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Guzdial, M., Rose, K. Squeak --- Open Personal Computing and Multimedia. Prentice Hall, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Kelleher, C., Pausch, R. Lowering the Barriers to Programming: A Taxonomy of Programming Environments and Languages for Novice Programmers. ACM Computing Surveys, 37, 2, June 2005, pp. 83--137. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Kindborg, M., Scholz, R. MagicWords: A Programmable Learning Toy. Proc. IDC 2006, Tampere, Finland, 2006, pp. 165--166. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Maloney, J., Burd, L., Kafai, Y., Rusk, N. Silverman, B., Resnick, M. Scratch: A Sneak Preview. Second International Conference on Creating, Connecting and Collaborating through Computing, 2004, pp. 104--109. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. McGee, K., Hedborg, J. Partner Technologies: an alternative to technology masters & servants. Proc. COSIGN 2004, University of Split, Croatia, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Morgado, L. Framework for Computer Programming in Preschool and Kindergarten. PhD thesis, Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Portugal, 2006. Available at: http://home.utad.pt/~leonelm/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Smith, R. B. Experiences with the Alternate Reality Kit: An Example of the Tension Between Literalism and Magic. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, September 1987, pp. 42--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. How preschool children used a behaviour-based programming tool

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          IDC '07: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Interaction design and children
          June 2007
          222 pages
          ISBN:9781595937476
          DOI:10.1145/1297277

          Copyright © 2007 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 6 June 2007

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate172of578submissions,30%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader