skip to main content
10.1145/1298023.1298052acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Design de interfaces tangíveis educacionais: uma metodologia baseada em contexto

Published:19 November 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

Manipulatives are common tools in Mathematics classrooms of elementary school. Tangible interfaces aggregate the benefits of traditional manipulatives with the new forms of interaction provided by technology. This work proposes a methodology for the development of tangible interfaces for Mathematics teaching which would be suitable for Brazilian classrooms. To reach this aim, our design process is based on socio-culturalist principles and usability guidelines, placing the context-of-use analysis as a phase of utmost importance.

References

  1. Eisenberg, M. Mindstuff: Educational Technology Beyond the Computer. Convergence, 9, 2 (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Eisenberg, M., Eisenberg, A., Hendrix, S. et al. As We May Print: New Directions in Output Devices and Computational Crafts for Children. IDC 2003. 7, 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Ishii, H., Ullmer, B. Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. CHI'97. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Kamii, C., Lewis, B., Kirkland, L. Manipulatives: when are they useful? J. Math. Behavior, 20, 1, (2001), 21--31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Maguire, M. Context of Use within usability activities. Int J. Human-Computer Studies, 55 (2001), 453--483. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Meira, L. Making sense of instructional devices: the emergence of transparence in mathematical activity. J. for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 2 (1998), 121--142.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Moura, M. A séria busca no jogo: do lúdico na Matemática. In Kishimoto, T. (Org.) Jogo, brinquedo, brincadeira e a educação. 2 ed. São Paulo, Cortez Editora, 1997, 73--87.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Moyer, P. Are we having fun yet? How teachers use manipulatives to teach Mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47, 2 (2001), 175--197.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Nardi, B. Activity theory and HCI. In Nardi, B. (Ed.) Activity Theory and HCI, 7--16. MIT Press, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Nemirovsky, R., Borba, M. Perceptuo-motor activity and imagination in Mathematics learning. PME 27. (2003), v.1, 103--104.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. O'Malley, C., Fraser, D. S. Literature Review in Learning with Tangible Technologies. Report 12, NESTA Futurelab Series. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Rydenhag, T. Design for Free Play. MsC. Thesis, University of Göteborg, Sweden, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Weiser, M. The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American, 265, 3 (1991), 94--104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Design de interfaces tangíveis educacionais: uma metodologia baseada em contexto

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        IHC '06: Proceedings of VII Brazilian symposium on Human factors in computing systems
        November 2006
        251 pages
        ISBN:1595934324
        DOI:10.1145/1298023

        Copyright © 2006 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 19 November 2006

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        IHC '06 Paper Acceptance Rate20of68submissions,29%Overall Acceptance Rate331of973submissions,34%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader