skip to main content
10.1145/1321440.1321513acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Predicting individual priorities of shared activities using support vector machines

Published:06 November 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

Activity-centric collaboration environments help knowledge workers to manage the context of their shared work activities by providing a representation for an activity and its resources. Activity management systems provide more structure and organization than email to execute the shared activity but, as the number of shared activities increases, it becomes more and more difficult for users to focus on important activities that need their attention. This paper describes a personalized activity prioritization approach implemented on top of the Lotus Connections Activities management system. Our prototype implementation allows each user to view activities ordered by her/his predicted priorities. The predictions are made using a ranking Support Vector Machine model trained with the user's past interactions with the activities system. We describe the prioritization interface and the results of an offline experiment based on data from 13 users over 6-months. Our results show that our feature set derived from shared activity structures can significantly increase prediction accuracy compared to a recency baseline.

References

  1. Agichtein, E., Brill, E., and Dumais, S. Improving web search ranking by incorporating user behavior information. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual international ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in information Retrieval (SIGIR '06), 19--26 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bellotti, V., Ducheneaut, N., Howard, M., and Smith, I. 2003. Taking email to task: the design and evaluation of a task management centered email tool. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI '03 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Boardman, R., & Sasse, M. A. "Stuff goes into the computer, but it doesn't come out" A cross-tool study of personal information management. Proc CHI 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Burges, C., Shaked, T., Renshaw, E., Lazier, A., Deeds, M., Hamilton, N., and Hullender, G. 2005. Learning to rank using gradient descent. In Proceedings of the 22nd international Conference on Machine Learning (Bonn, Germany, August 07 - 11, 2005). ICML '05, vol. 119. ACM Press, New York, NY, 89--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Cao, Y., Xu, J., Liu, T., Li, H., Huang, Y., and Hon, H. 2006. Adapting ranking SVM to document retrieval. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual international ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in information Retrieval (Seattle, Washington, USA, August 06 - 11, 2006). SIGIR '06. ACM Press, New York, NY, 186--193 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Carvalho, V. R. and Cohen, W. W. 2005. On the collective classification of email "speech acts". In Proceedings of the 28th Annual international ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in information Retrieval (Salvador, Brazil, August 15 - 19, 2005). SIGIR '05. ACM Press, New York, NY, 345--352. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Czerwinski, M., Horvitz, E., & Wilhite, S., "A diary study of task switching and interruptions," in: Proc ACM CHI 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Chang, C. and Lin, C. LIBSVM : a library for support vector machines, 2001. Software available at http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Hsu, C., Chang C and Lin, C. "A practical guide to support vector classification" http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/papers/guide/guide.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Cho, J. and Garcia-Molina, H. 2000. The Evolution of the Web and Implications for an Incremental Crawler VLDB 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Cohen, W. W. Schapire, R. E. Singer, Y. Learning to Order Things In Advances in Neural Information Processing System 1998, pp. 451--457 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Crammer, K. and Singer, Y. Pranking with ranking. In Proceedings of the conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), 2001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Dragunov, A. N., Dietterich, T. G., Johnsrude, K., McLaughlin, M., Li, L., and Herlocker, J. L. 2005. TaskTracer: a desktop environment to support multi-tasking knowledge workers. In Proceedings of the 10th international Conference on intelligent User interfaces (San Diego, California, USA, January 10 - 13, 2005). IUI '05. ACM Press, New York, NY, 75--82 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Dredze, M., Lau, T., and Kushmerick, N. 2006. Automatically classifying emails into activities. In Proceedings of the 11th international Conference on intelligent User interfaces (Sydney, Australia, January 29 - February 01, 2006). IUI '06. ACM Press, New York, NY, 70--77 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Geyer, W., Muller, M., Moore, M., Wilcox, E., Cheng, L., Brownholtz, B., Hill, C. R., Millen, D. R., "ActivityExplorer: Activity-Centric Collaboration from Research to Product," IBM Systems Journal - Special Issue on Business Collaboration, 713--739 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Geyer, W., Brownholtz, B., Muller, M., Dugan, C., Wilcox, E., and Millen, D. R. Malibu Personal Productivity Assistant. Accepted Work in Progress Submission, CHI 2007, San Jose, CA, April 28 - May 3, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Google Desktop. http://desktop.google.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. González, V., and Mark, G. Managing currents of work: Multi-tasking among multiple collaborations. Proc ECSCW 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Herbrich, R. Graepel, T. and Obermayer, K. Large margin rank boundaries for ordinal regression. In Advances in Large Margin Classifiers, pp 115--132. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Hudson, J. M., Christensen, J., Kellogg, W. A., and Erickson, T. 2002. "I'd be overwhelmed, but it's just one more thing to do": availability and interruption in research management. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Changing Our World, Changing Ourselves (Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, April 20 - 25, 2002). CHI '02. ACM Press, New York, NY, 97--104 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Joachims, T. Optimizing search engines using clickthrough data. In Proceedings of the Eighth ACM SIGKDD international Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, July 23 - 26, 2002). KDD '02. ACM Press, New York, NY, 133--142 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Lotus Connections: Social Software for Business. http://www-142.ibm.com/software/sw-lotus/products/product3.nsf/wdocs/connectionshome, retrieved 4/26/2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. McCrickard D. S. & Chewar C. M. (2003) Attuning notification design to user goals and attention costs, Communications of ACM, 46 (3), 67--72 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Millen, D. R., Feinberg, J., and Kerr, B. 2006. Dogear: Social bookmarking in the enterprise. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montréal, Québec, Canada, April 22 - 27, 2006). R. Grinter, T. Rodden, P. Aoki, E. Cutrell, R. Jeffries, and G. Olson, Eds. CHI '06. ACM Press, New York, NY, 111--120 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Mitchell, T. M., Wang, S. H., Huang, Y. and Cheyer. A. Extracting knowledge about users' activities from raw workstation contents. In Proc. of AAAI-06, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Moore, M., Estrada, M., Finley, T., Muller, M. and Geyer, W. Next generation activity-centric computing. Demo at ACM CSCW 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Moran, T. P., Cozzi, A., & Farrell, S. P. (2005), "Unified activity management: supporting people in e-business," Communications of the ACM, 48(12), pp. 67--70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Muller, M. J. (2004). Activity graphs of the microstructure of complex work. Poster at CSCW 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Muller, M. J., Geyer, W., Brownholtz, B., Wilcox, E., and Millen, D. R. One-hundred days in an activity-centric collaboration environment based on shared objects. Proc. CHI 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Muller, M. J., Geyer, W., Brownholtz, B., Dugan, C., Millen, D. R., and Wilcox, E. (2007). Tag-based Metonymic Search in an Activity-Centric Aggregation Service. To appear in Proc ECSCW 2007, Limerick, Ireland, September 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Quan, D., and Karger, D. R., (2003). 'Haystack: Metadata enabled information management'. Proceedings of UIST 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Sen, S., Geyer, W., Muller, M. J., Moore, M., Brownholtz, B., Wilcox, E., & Millen, D. R. (2006). FeedMe: A collaborative alert filtering system. Proc. CSCW 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Ringel, M. and Hirschberg, J. 2002. Automated message prioritization: making voicemail retrieval more efficient. In CHI '02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, April 20 - 25, 2002). CHI '02. ACM Press, New York, NY, 592--593 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Vapnik, V. 1998. Statistical Learning Theory. Wiley-Interscience.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Whittaker, S., Sidner, C., "Email Overload: Exploring Personal Information Management of Email," Proc. CHI'96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Xu, J., Cao, Y., Li, H., and Zhao, M. 2005. Ranking definitions with supervised learning methods. In Special interest Tracks and Posters of the 14th international Conference on World Wide Web (Chiba, Japan, May 10 - 14, 2005). WWW '05. ACM Press, 811--819. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Predicting individual priorities of shared activities using support vector machines

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader