skip to main content
10.1145/1321753.1321766acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

How can multi-topology routing be used for intradomain traffic engineering?

Published:27 August 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

Multi-Topology routing allows each router in a network to maintain several valid routes to each destination. This increases the possibilities to spread traffic towards a destination over multiple paths with connectionless routing protocols like OSPF or IS-IS. In this paper, we report early ideas on how this can be utilized as a Traffic Engineering tool. We look at both offline and online approaches, and argue that a Multi-Topology based solution has advantages over previous solutions in both paradigms.

References

  1. B. Fortz and M. Thorup, "Internet traffic engineering by optimizing OSPF weights." in Proceedings INFOCOM, 2000, pp. 519--528.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. A. Sridharan, R. Guerin, and C. Diot, "Achieving near-optimal traffic engineering solutions for current OSPF/IS-IS networks," IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 234--247, Apr. 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. D. Awduche, L. Berger, D. Gan, T. Li, V. Srinivasan, and G. Swallow, "RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP tunnels," RFC3209, dec 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. D. Mitra and K. G. Ramakrishnan, "A case study of multiservice, multipriority traffic engineeringdesign for data networks," in Proceedings GLOBECOM, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Dec. 1999, pp. 1077--1083.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. A. Feldmann, A. Greenberg, C. Lund, N. Reingold, J. Rexford, and F. True, "Deriving traffic demands for operational IP networks: methodology and experience," IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 265--280, June 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. A. Soule, A. Lakhina, N. Taft, K. Papagiannaki, K. Salamatian, A. Nucci, M. Crovella, and C. Diot, "Traffic matrices: balancing measurements, inference and modeling," in Proceedings SIGMETRICS, Banff, Alberta, Canada, 2005, pp. 362--373. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. D. Andersen, H. Balakrishnan, R. Morris, and F. Kaashoek, "Resilient overlay networks," in Proceedings SOSP, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. A. Akella, B. Maggs, S. Seshan, A. Shaikh, and R. Sitaraman, "A measurement-based analysis of multihoming," in Proceedings SIGCOMM, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. A. Basu and J. G. Riecke, "Stability issues in OSPF routing," in Proceedings of SIGCOMM, San Diego, California, USA, Aug. 2001, pp. 225--236. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. R. Teixeira, A. Shaikh, T. Griffin, and G. M. Voelker, "Network sensitivity to hot-potato disruptions," in Proceedings of SIGCOMM, Portland, Oregon, USA, Aug. 2004, pp. 231--244. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. Nucci, B. Schroeder, S. Bhattacharyya, N. Taft, and C. Diot, "IGP Link Weight Assignment for Transient Link Failures," in 18th International Teletraffic Congress, Berlin, Germany, Aug. 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. B. Fortz and M. Thorup, "Robust optimization of OSPF/IS-IS weights," in INOC, Oct. 2003, pp. 225--230.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. A. Sridharan and R. Guerin, "Making IGP routing robust to link failures," in Proceedings of Networking, Waterloo, Canada, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. D. Applegate and E. Cohen, "Making routing robust to changing traffic demands: Algorithms and evaluation," IEEE Transactions on Networking, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1193--1206, Dec. 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. H. Wang, H. Xie, L. Qiu, Y. R. Yang, Y. Zhang, and A. Greenberg, "COPE: traffic engineering in dynamic networks," in Proceedings SIGCOMM, 2006, pp. 99--110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. A. Elwalid, C. Jin, S. H. Low, and I. Widjaja, "MATE: MPLS adaptive traffic engineering," in Proceedings INFOCOM, 2001, pp. 1300--1309.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. S. Kandula, D. Katabi, B. Davie, and A. Charny, "Walking the tightrope: responsive yet stable traffic engineering," in Proceedings SIGCOMM, 2005, pp. 253--264. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. P. Psenak, S. Mirtorabi, A. Roy, L. Nguen, and P. Pillay-Esnault, "MT-OSPF: Multi topology (MT) routing in OSPF," IETF Internet Draft (work in progress), Nov. 2006, draft-ietf-ospf-mt-07.txt.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. T. Przygienda, N. Shen, and N. Sheth, "M-ISIS: Multi topology (MT) routing in IS-IS," Internet Draft (work in progress), Oct. 2005, draft-ietf-isis-wg-multi-topology-11.txt.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. A. Kvalbein, A. F. Hansen, T. Čičić, S. Gjessing, and O. Lysne, "Fast IP network recovery using multiple routing configurations," in Proceedings INFOCOM, Apr. 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. A. Kvalbein and O. Lysne, "Robust load balancing using multi-topology routing," Simula Research Laboratory, Tech. Rep. 2007--03, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. X. Yang and D. Wetherall, "Source selectable path diversity via routing deflections," in Proceedings SIGCOMM, sep 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. A. Kvalbein, A. F. Hansen, T. Čičić, S. Gjessing, and O. Lysne, "Fast recovery from link failures using resilient routing layers," in Proceedings 10th IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC), June 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. S. Uhlig, B. Quoitin, J. Lepropre, and S. Balon, "Providing public intradomain traffic matrices to the research community," ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 83--86, Jan. 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. S. Kandula, D. Katabi, S. Sinha, and A. Berger, "Dynamic load balancing without packet reordering," ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 51--62, apr 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. How can multi-topology routing be used for intradomain traffic engineering?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      INM '07: Proceedings of the 2007 SIGCOMM workshop on Internet network management
      August 2007
      79 pages
      ISBN:9781595937889
      DOI:10.1145/1321753

      Copyright © 2007 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 August 2007

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader