skip to main content
10.1145/1324892.1324945acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Working the contract

Published:28 November 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents data and analysis from a long term ethnographic study of the design and development of an electronic patient records system in a UK hospital Trust. The project is a public private partnership (PPP) between the Trust and a US based software house (OurComp) contracted to supply, configure and support their customizable-off-the-shelf (COTS) healthcare information system in cooperation with an in-hospital project team. Given this contractual relationship for system delivery and support (increasingly common, and 'standard' in UK healthcare) we focus on the ways in which issues to do with the 'contract' enter into and impinge on everyday design and deployment work as part of the process of delivering dependable systems.

References

  1. Ackroyd, S., Harper, R., Hughes, J., Shapiro, D and Soothill, K. (1992) New Technology and Practical Police Work. OUP. Buckingham. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Anderson, R. (2000) Where the Rubber Hits the Road: Notes on the Deployment Problem In Workplace Studies. In Paul Luff, Jon Hindmarsh and Christian Heath (eds.), Workplace Studies: Recovering Work Practice and Informing System Design, Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Artman, H. (2002) Procurer usability requirements: negotiations in contract development Proceedings of the second Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction, pp 61 -- 70 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bittner, E. (1965) 'The concept of organisation', Social Research, 23, 239--255Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bloomfield, B. & Vurdubakis, T. Visions of Organization and Organizations of Vision. Accounting, Organizations and Society 22, 7 (1997), 639--668.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowers, J. (1994). The Work to Make a Network Work. In Proceedings of CSCW 94, © ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Brooks, F. (1995) The Mythical Man Month: Essays on software engineering, anniversary edn. Addison-Wesley: Boston. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Button, G. & Sharrock, W. (1996). Project work: the organisation of collaborative design and development in software engineering, in Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, v.5 n.4, p.369--386 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Button, G., & Sharrock, W. (1998). The Organizational Accountability of Technological Work. Social Studies of Science 28: 73--102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Coble, J., Karat, J. and Kahn, M. (1997) Maintaining a Focus on User Requirements Throughout the Development of Clinical Workstation Software. Proceedings of CHI '97 Atlanta. GA. USA. ACM Press. pp 170--179. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Ellingsen, G. and Monterio, E. (2000). A patchwork planet: The heterogeneity of electronic patient record systems in hospitals. In Proc. IRIS'2000 (Uddevalla, Sweden, August).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Grudin, J., (1991). The Development of Interactive Systems: Bridging the Gaps Between Developers and Users. IEEE Computer, 24, 4, 59--69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Hartswood, M., Procter, R., Rouchy, P., Rouncefield, M., Slack, R., Voss, A. (2003). 'Working IT out in Medical Practice: IT Systems Design and development as Co-production'. Methods of Information in Medicine, 2003. 42: pp 392--397Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Hartswood, M., Procter, R. N., Rouncefield, M., Slack, R. (2003). 'Making a Case in Medical Work: Implications for the Electronic Medical Record'. - in Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) Journal. Vol 12, Issue 3, pp241--266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Heath, C. & Luff, P. (1996). Documents and Professional Practice: 'bad' organizational reasons for 'good' clinical records. In Proceedings of CSCW 96 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Laprie 1991} J. C. Laprie, (Ed.). Dependability: Basic Concepts and Associated Terminology, Dependable Computing and Fault-Tolerant Systems. Springer-Verlag, 1991 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Poltrock, S., and Grudin, J. (1994). Organizational Obstacles to Interface Design and Development: Two Participant-Observer Studies. ToCHI, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp 52--80. © ACM Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Power, M. (1997) The Audit Society: rituals of verification. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Revill, J (2006) Thousands of children at risk after computer fault The Observer 26 February 2006Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and Situated Actions. CUPGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Thomas, E (2006) Inside the NHS Connecting for Health project Computer Business Review 7 July 2006Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Working the contract

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        OZCHI '07: Proceedings of the 19th Australasian conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Entertaining User Interfaces
        November 2007
        323 pages
        ISBN:9781595938725
        DOI:10.1145/1324892

        Copyright © 2007 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 28 November 2007

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        OZCHI '07 Paper Acceptance Rate26of42submissions,62%Overall Acceptance Rate362of729submissions,50%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader