ABSTRACT
This paper focuses on digital game experience: the feelings and experiences people have when they play digital games. Digital game experience is not a one-dimensional concept. Great variety exists in game genres and game players, and game experiences will differ accordingly. To date, game experience is studied in a rather fragmented way. As such, the field still lacks a common vocabulary and a shared taxonomy of the different dimensions of game experience. In this paper we describe a focus group study and present a tentative, but comprehensive categorisation of game experience. Focus groups with various types of gamers were organised to capture a full first-hand account of game experiences and second, findings were discussed in an expert meeting in which empirical findings were consolidated with existing theoretical findings. The categorisation bears relevance for both game theorists and game developers wanting to get to the heart of digital game experience.
- Bartle, R. A. (1996). Hearts, clubs, diamonds and spades: players who suit MUDs. http://www.mud.co.uk/richard/hcds.html.Google Scholar
- Bracken, C. C., Lange, R. L., and Denny. J. (2005). Online video games and gamers' sensations of spatial, social, and co-presence. Proceedings of the annual FuturePlay conferenceGoogle Scholar
- Brown, E. and Cairns, P. (2004). A grounded investigation of game immersion. ACM CHI 2004, 1297--1300. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow. The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- Ermi, L. and Mäyrä, F. (2005). Fundamental components of the gameplay experience: Analysing immersion. In: S. de Castell & J. Jenson (eds.), Changing Views: Worlds in Play. Selected papers of the 2005 Digital Games Research Association's Second International Conference.Google Scholar
- Gilleade, K. M. and Dix, A. (2004). Using frustration in the design of adaptive videogames. ACM ACE 2004, 228--232. Google ScholarDigital Library
- IJsselsteijn, W. A., de Kort, Y. A. W., & Poels, K. (in preparation). Development of the Game Experience Questionnaire (GEQ).Google Scholar
- Klimmt, C. (2003). Dimensions and determinants of the enjoyment of playing digital games: a three-level model. In: Copier, M., and Raessens, J. (Eds.), Level up: Digital games research conference. Utrecht University, Faculty of Arts.Google Scholar
- Klimmt, C., Rizzo, A. S., Vorderer, P., Koch, J., and FIscher, T. (2007). Suspense as dimension of video game enjoyment. Paper presented to the Game Studies special interest group at the annual conference of the International Communication Association, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
- De Kort, Y. A. W., IJsselsteijn, W. A., & Poels, K. (submitted). Digital Gaming Devices as Social Presence Technology: Development of the Social Presence in Gaming Questionnaire (SPGQ).Google Scholar
- Lunt, P. & Livingstone, S. (1996). Rethinking the focus group in media and communications research. Journal of Communication, 46(2), 79--98.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Merton, R. K. (1987). The focused interview and focus groups: continuities and discontinuities. Public Opinion Quarterly, 51, 550--556.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Miller, L. et al. (1996). Female participants' Preferences in Software Design: Insights from a Focus Group. Interpersonal Computing and Technology, 4(2), 27--36.Google Scholar
- Sweetser, P & Wyeth, P. (2005). GameFlow: A model for evaluating player enjoyment in games. ACM Computers in Entertainment, 3 (3), 1--24. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yee, N. (2002). Facets: 5 motivation factors for why people play MMORPG's. http://www.nickyee.com/facets/home.html.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- "It is always a lot of fun!": exploring dimensions of digital game experience using focus group methodology
Recommendations
Seriously fun: exploring how to combine promoting health awareness and engaging gameplay
MindTrek '08: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Entertainment and media in the ubiquitous eraCombining engaging gameplay and educational aspects promoting health awareness gives an interesting challenge to game designers. This case study explores adolescents' (aged 13--16) technology usage, gaming habits and gaming motivations, as well as the ...
Moving Beyond Fun: Evaluating Serious Experience in Digital Games
CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsGames are normally considered to be "fun", though recently there is growing interest in how gameplay can promote empathy and encourage reflection through "serious experience". However, when looking beyond enjoyment, it is not clear how to actually ...
Shared Fun Is Doubled Fun: Player Enjoyment as a Function of Social Setting
Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Fun and GamesAlthough the social relevance of digital gaming has been discussed and investigated in cultural and sociological readings, social context has been largely neglected in terms of in-game player experience. In this paper we present a study in which player ...
Comments