skip to main content
10.1145/1328491.1328545acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesi-createConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Surface EMG topography: a new assessment tool in low back pain rehabilitation

Published:23 April 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

Among different pathologic conditions that give rise to Low Back Pain (LBP), abnormal back muscle contraction strategy was suspected to be a major contributory factor. However, studies in this area are few. The purposes of this study were to establish a reliable and objective assessment method which provide information on back muscles coordination during dynamic motion, and to testify the possible application of this method in LBP rehabilitation assessment. Back muscle surface electromyography (SEMG) was measured by an array of SEMG electrodes (7x3) during forward bending. The root mean square (RMS) of the SEMG signal was calculated as a function of both position and time to produce the SEMG topography. The SEMG topography of 30 healthy subjects served as the normal database and produced a reproducible activation pattern. SEMG topography of the 5 LBP patients presented varied activation pattern and were different from that of normal pattern. Corrective changes of contraction strategies revealed in SEMG topography patterns were found in some of the LBP patients after rehabilitation. In this study, the effectiveness of LBP rehabilitation was uncovered by SEMG topography, with a visible monitoring of rehabilitation progress. With this method, a practical and objective assessment for LBP rehabilitation is achievable.

References

  1. Humphrey AR, Nargol AV, Jones AP, Ratcliffe AA, and Greenough CG. The value of electromyography of the lumbar paraspinal muscles in discriminating between chronic-low-back-pain sufferers and normal subjects. Eur. Spine J. 2005;14:175--84.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Rucker KS, Cole AJ, Weinstein SM. Low back pain: a symptom-based approach to diagnosis and treatment. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Rzanny R, Grassme R, Reichenbach JR et al. Simultaneous surface electromyograhpy (SEMG) and 31P-MR spectroscopy measurements of the lumbar back muscle during isometric exercise. J. Neurosci. Methods 2004;133:143--52Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Kramer M, Ebert V, Kinzl L, Dehner C, Elbel M, and Hartwig E. Surface electromyography of the paravertebral muscles in patients with chronic low back pain. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2005;86:31--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Perez MA and Nussbaum MA. Lower torso muscle activation patterns for high-magnitude static exertions: gender differences and the effects of twisting. Spine 2002;27:1326--35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Santos-Eggimann B, Wietlisbach V, Rickenbach M, Paccaud F, and Gutzwiller F. One-year prevalence of low back pain in two Swiss regions: estimates from the population participating in the 1992--1993 MONICA project. Spine 2000;25:2473--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Waxman R, Tennant A, and Helliwell P. A prospective follow-up study of low back pain in the community. Spine 2000;25:2085--90.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Arokoski JP, Valta T, Kankaanpaa M, and Airaksinen O. Activation of lumbar paraspinal and abdominal muscles during therapeutic exercises in chronic low back pain patients. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2004;85:823--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Slade SC, Ther MM, and Keating JL. Trunk-strengthening exercises for chronic low back pain: a systematic review. J. Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006;29:163--73.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Potvin JR and O'Brien PR. Trunk muscle co-contraction increases during fatiguing, isometric, lateral bend exertions. Possible implications for spine stability. Spine 1998;23:774--80.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. De Luca CJ. "Use of surface EMG signal for performance evaluation of back muscle". Muscle Nerve 1993; 16:210--6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Roy SH, De Luca CJ, Emley M, Buijs RJC. "Spectral electromyographic assessment of back muscles in patients with low back pain undergoing rehabilitation". Spine 1995; 20(1):38--48Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. G. Waddell, "The Back Pain Revolution", Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Lu WW, Luk KD, Cheung KM, Wong YW, Leong JC. "Back muscle contraction patterns of patients with low back pain before and after rehabilitation treatment: an electromyographic evaluation". J Spinal Disord. 2001 Aug;14(4):277--82.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Newcomer KL, Jacobson TD, Gabriel DA, Larson DR, Brey RH, An KN. Muscle activation patterns in subjects with and without low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Jun;83(6):816--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Hogrel JY. Clinical applications of surface electromyography in neuromuscular disorders. Neurophysiol. Clin. 2005;35:59--71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Arokoski JP, Valta T, Kankaanpaa M, and Airaksinen O. Activation of lumbar paraspinal and abdominal muscles during therapeutic exercises in chronic low back pain patients. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2004;85:823--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Newcomer KL, Jacobson TD, Gabriel DA, Larson DR, Brey RH, An KN. Muscle activation patterns in subjects with and without low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Jun;83(6):816--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Nouwen A, Bush C. The relationship between paraspinal EMG and chronic low back pain. Pain. 1984 Oct;20(2):109--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Watson PJ, Booker CK, Main CJ, Chen AC. Surface electromyography in the identification of chronic low back pain patients: the development of the flexion relaxation ratio. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1997 Apr;12(3):165--171.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Janda V: Muscles, central nervous motor regulation and back problems. The Neurobiologic Mechanisms in Manipulative Therapy. Edited by JM Korr. New York, Plenum Press, 1977, pp 21--41Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Wolf SL, Basmajian JV: Assessment of paraspinal electromyographic activity in normal subjects and in chronic back pain patients using a muscle biofeedback device. International Series in Biomechanics Vib. Edited by E Asmussen, K Jorgensen, Baltimore University Park Press. 1977, pp 319--324Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Wolf SL, Nacht M, Kelly JL: EMG biofeedback training during dynamic movement for low back pain patients. BehavTher 13:395--406, 1982Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Surface EMG topography: a new assessment tool in low back pain rehabilitation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        i-CREATe '07: Proceedings of the 1st international convention on Rehabilitation engineering & assistive technology: in conjunction with 1st Tan Tock Seng Hospital Neurorehabilitation Meeting
        April 2007
        272 pages
        ISBN:9781595938527
        DOI:10.1145/1328491

        Copyright © 2007 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 23 April 2007

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader