skip to main content
10.1145/1329125.1329326acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaamasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Rumours and reputation: evaluating multi-dimensional trust within a decentralised reputation system

Published: 14 May 2007 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper we develop a novel probabilistic model of computational trust that explicitly deals with correlated multi-dimensional contracts. Our starting point is to consider an agent attempting to estimate the utility of a contract, and we show that this leads to a model of computational trust whereby an agent must determine a vector of estimates that represent the probability that any dimension of the contract will be successfully fulfilled, and a covariance matrix that describes the uncertainty and correlations in these probabilities. We present a formalism based on the Dirichlet distribution that allows an agent to calculate these probabilities and correlations from their direct experience of contract outcomes, and we show that this leads to superior estimates compared to an alternative approach using multiple independent beta distributions. We then show how agents may use the sufficient statistics of this Dirichlet distribution to communicate and fuse reputation within a decentralised reputation system. Finally, we present a novel solution to the problem of rumour propagation within such systems. This solution uses the notion of private and shared information, and provides estimates consistent with a centralised reputation system, whilst maintaining the anonymity of the agents, and avoiding bias and overconfidence.

References

[1]
Y. Bar-Shalom, X. R. Li, and T. Kirubarajan. Estimation with Applications to Tracking and Navigation. Wiley Interscience, 2001.
[2]
C. Boutilier. The foundations of expected expected utility. In Proc. of the 4th Int. Joint Conf. on on Artificial Intelligence, pages 285--290, Acapulco, Mexico, 2003.
[3]
M. Evans, N. Hastings, and B. Peacock. Statistical Distributions. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1993.
[4]
N. Griffiths. Task delegation using experience-based multi-dimensional trust. In Proc. of the 4th Int. Joint Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pages 489--496, New York, USA, 2005.
[5]
N. Gukrai, D. DeAngelis, K. K. Fullam, and K. S. Barber. Modelling multi-dimensional trust. In Proc. of the 9th Int. Workshop on Trust in Agent Systems, Hakodate, Japan, 2006.
[6]
A. Jøsang and R. Ismail. The beta reputation system. In Proc. of the 15th Bled Electronic Commerce Conf., pages 324--337, Bled, Slovenia, 2002.
[7]
E. M. Maximilien and M. P. Singh. Agent-based trust model involving multiple qualities. In Proc. of the 4th Int. Joint Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pages 519--526, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2005.
[8]
S. D. Ramchurn, D. Hunyh, and N. R. Jennings. Trust in multiagent systems. Knowledge Engineering Review, 19(1):1--25, 2004.
[9]
S. Reece and S. Roberts. Robust, low-bandwidth, multi-vehicle mapping. In Proc. of the 8th Int. Conf. on Information Fusion, Philadelphia, USA, 2005.
[10]
J. Sabater and C. Sierra. REGRET: A reputation model for gregarious societies. In Proc. of the 4th Workshop on Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies, pages 61--69, Montreal, Canada, 2001.
[11]
W. T. L. Teacy, J. Patel, N. R. Jennings, and M. Luck. TRAVOS: Trust and reputation in the context of inaccurate information sources. Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 12(2):183--198, 2006.
[12]
S. Utete. Network Management in Decentralised Sensing Systems. PhD thesis, University of Oxford, UK, 1994.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Rumours and reputation: evaluating multi-dimensional trust within a decentralised reputation system

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    AAMAS '07: Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
    May 2007
    1585 pages
    ISBN:9788190426275
    DOI:10.1145/1329125
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    • IFAAMAS

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 14 May 2007

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Dirichlet distribution
    2. multi-dimensional trust
    3. rumour propogation

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    AAMAS07
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,155 of 5,036 submissions, 23%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2022)DIPP: Diffusion of Privacy Preferences in Online Social NetworksAdvances in Social Simulation10.1007/978-3-030-92843-8_3(29-40)Online publication date: 30-Mar-2022
    • (2020)A Survey on Trust Modeling from a Bayesian PerspectiveWireless Personal Communications10.1007/s11277-020-07097-5Online publication date: 24-Jan-2020
    • (2018)Mobile Agent-Based Mobile Intelligent Business Security Transaction ModelComputer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1007/978-981-13-3044-5_4(50-65)Online publication date: 11-Dec-2018
    • (2017)A multi-dimensional trust and reputation calculation model for cloud computing environments2017 ISEA Asia Security and Privacy (ISEASP)10.1109/ISEASP.2017.7976983(1-8)Online publication date: Jan-2017
    • (2017)How to trust a few among manyAutonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems10.1007/s10458-016-9337-531:3(531-560)Online publication date: 1-May-2017
    • (2017)Filtering unfair ratings from dishonest advisors in multi-criteria e-marketsAutonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems10.1007/s10458-015-9314-431:1(36-65)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2017
    • (2015)Trust in Social MediaSynthesis Lectures on Information Security, Privacy, and Trust10.2200/S00657ED1V01Y201507SPT01310:1(1-129)Online publication date: 23-Sep-2015
    • (2014)Robust trust managementProceedings of the 2014 international conference on Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems10.5555/2615731.2616140(1713-1714)Online publication date: 5-May-2014
    • (2014)Correlated multi-dimensional qos metrics for trust evaluation within web servicesProceedings of the 2014 international conference on Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems10.5555/2615731.2616084(1605-1606)Online publication date: 5-May-2014
    • (2014)Choosing a Candidate Using Efficient Allocation of Biased InformationACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/25583275:4(1-30)Online publication date: 29-Dec-2014
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media