skip to main content
research-article

Trends in the living room and beyond: results from ethnographic studies using creative and playful probing

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 May 2008Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

In this article we present the findings of two ethnographic studies embedded into two broader projects on interactive television in the home environment. Based on previous research on the home context and inspired by ongoing trends around interactive television, we explored basic concepts, such as the extended home, and new interaction techniques, in particular those related to future developments of the remote control. For the two studies we also developed two variations of the cultural probes method: creative probing and playful probing. This methodological approach proved to be appropriate for gathering in-depth data on participants' opinions, attitudes, and ideas in a way favorable to the participants. Overall, our results support existing research data on user media behavior and expectations and show trends in and beyond the living room, concerned with personalization, privacy, and security as well as communication.

References

  1. AGAMANOLIS, ST. 2006. At the intersection of broadband and broadcasting: How ITV technologies can support human connectedness. In Proceedings of the EuroiTV 2006 Conference (Athens, May 25-26), 17-22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. ATKINSON, P. ET AL. (eds.). 2001. Handbook of Ethnography. Sage, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. AROYO, L., BELLEKENS, P., BJORKMAN, M., HOUBEN, G-J., AKKERMANS, P., AND KAPTEIN, A. 2007. SenSee framework for personalized access to TV content. In Proceedings of the Interactive TV: 5th European Conference, EuroITV 2007 (Amsterdam, May 24-25), P. Cesar et al. (eds.), 156-165. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. BATTARBEE, K. 2003. Defining co-experience. In Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces (Pittsburgh, PA, June 23-26), ACM, New York, 109-113. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. BERNHAUPT, R., WEISS, A., OBRIST, M., AND TSCHELIGI, M. 2007. Playful probing: Making probing more fun. In Proceedings of the INTERACT Conference (Rio de Janeiro). Springer LNCS, 606-619. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. BERNHAUPT, R., OBRIST, M., AND TSCHELIGI, M. 2006. Usability and usage of iTV services: Lessons learned in an Austrian field trial. In Proceedings of the EuroiTV 2006 Conference (Athens, May 25-26), 234-241.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. CARTER, S. AND MANKOFF, J. 2005. When participants do the capturing: The role of media in diary studies. In Proceedings of the Human Factors in Computing Systems Conference, CHI 05 (Portland, OR), 899-908. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. CHORIANOPOULOS, K. AND SPINELLIS, D. 2003. A metaphor for personalized television programming. In Universal Access: Theoretical Perspectives, Practice, and Experience. Proceedings of the 7th ERCIM Workshop on User Interfaces for All, N. Carbonelle and C. Stephanides C. (eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2615, SpringerVerlag, Berlin, 187-194. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. CRABTREE, A. AND RODDEN, T. 2004. Domestic routines and design for the home. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: Journal of Collaborative Computing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. CRABTREE, A., HEMMINGS, T., RODDEN, T., CHEVERST, K., CLARKE, K., DEWSBURY, G., HUGHES, J., AND ROUNCEFIELD, M. 2003. Designing with care: Adapting cultural probes to inform design in sensitive settings. In Proceedings of the Conference on New Directions in Interaction, Information Environments, Media, and Technology, OzCHI'03.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. CRN 2007. www.childresearch.net/. Accessed Oct. 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. EMERSON, R. M., FRETZ, R. I., AND SHAW, L. 1995. Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. ERONEN, L. 2003. User centered research for interactive television. In Proceedings of the First European Conference on Interactive Television, EuroiTV'03, 5-12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. FETTERMAN, D. M. 1998. Ethnography: Step by Step. 2nd ed., Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. GARFINKEL, H. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. McGraw-Hill, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. GAVER, B., DUNNE, T., AND PACENTI, E. 1999. Design: Cultural probes. Interactions 6, 1, 21-29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. HA, T. S., JUNG, J. H., AND OH, S. Y. 2006. Method to analyze user behavior in the home environment. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 10, 110-121. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. HADDON, L. 2006. The contribution of domestication research to in-home computing and media consumption. The Information Society J. 22, 195-203.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. HARPER, R. 2003. Inside the Smart Home. London et al. Springer Verlag, London. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. HEMMING, T., CRABTREE, A., RODDEN, T., CLARKE T., AND ROUNCEFIELD, M. 2002. Probing the probes. In Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference, 23-25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. HINDUS, D., MAINWARING, S.D., LEDUC, N., HAGSTROM, N.L., AND BAYLEY, O. 2001. Casablanca: Designing social communication devices for the home. In Proceedings of the CHI'01 Conference, ACM, New York, 325-332. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. HUIZINGA, J. 1950. Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture. Beacon Press, Boston, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. HULKKO, S., KEINONEN T., MATTELMAKI, T, AND VIRTANEN, K. 2004, Mobile probes. In Proceedings of the 2004 NordiCHI Conference, 43-51. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. HUTCHINSON, H., MACKAY, W., WESTERLUND, B., BEDERSON, B.B., DRUIN, A., PLAISANT, C., BEAUDOUINLAFON, M., CONVERSY, S., EVANS, H., HANSEN, H., ROUSSEL, N., EIDERBACK, B., LINDQUIST, S., AND SUNDBLAD, Y. 2003. Technology probes: Inspiring design for and with families. In Proceedings of the CHI'03 Conference, ACM, New York, 17-24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. JAASKO, V. AND MATTELMAKI, T. 2003. Observing and probing. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces, DPPI'03, ACM, New York, 126-131. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. KJAER, A., MADSEN, K. H., AND PETERSEN, M. G. 2000. Methodological challenges in the study of technology use at home. In Home Informatics and Telematics: Information, Technology and Society, A. Sloane and F. van Rijn (eds.), Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA, 45-60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. KNOCHE, H. AND MCCARTHY, J. D. 2005. Design requirements for mobile TV. In Proceedings of the Mobile HCI 2005 (Sept. 19-22, Salzburg), 69-76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. LESSITER, J., FREEMAN, J., DAVIS, R, AND DUMBRECK, A. 2003. Helping viewers press the right buttons: Generating intuitive labels for digital terrestrial TV remote controls. Psychnology 1, 3, 355-377.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. LULL, J. 1990. Inside Family Viewing. Routhledge, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. MULLER, M.J. 2003. Participatory design: The third space in HCI. In The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies and Emerging Applications, J. A. Jacko, and A. Sears (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mawah, NJ, 1051-1068. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. NEGROPONTE, N. 1995. Being Digital. Hodder and Stoughton, London. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. NOKIA 2004. Bringing mobility to homes. Home Domain Short Paper. http://nokiapapers.techrepublic.com.com/whitepaper.aspx?docid=236041. Accessed Dec. 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. NORMAN, D. A. 2002. The Design of Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. O'BRIEN, J., RODDEN, T., ROUNCEFIELD, M.J., AND HUGHES, J. 1999. At home with the technology: An ethnographic study of a set-top-box trial. ACM Trans. Computer-Human Interaction, 282-308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. OBRIST, M., BERNHAUPT, R., AND TSCHELIGI, M. 2006. Interactive television for the home: An ethnographic study on users requirements and experiences. In Proceedings of the EuroiTV 2006 Conference (Athens, May 25-26), 349-358.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. PORTOLAN, N., NAEL, M., RENOULLIN, J. L., AND NAUDIN, S. 1999. Will we speak to our TV remote control in the future? In Proceedings of the HFT'99 Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. REEVE, J. 1992. Understanding Motivation and Emotion. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Fort Worth, TX.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. SCHOTANUS, H. A. AND VERKOELEN C. A. A. 2003. Extended home environment from a security perspective; X-home deliverable.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. TAYLOR, A. S. AND SWAN, L. 2005. Artful systems in the home. In Proceedings of the Human Factors in Computing Systems Conference, CHI'05 (Portland, OR), ACM, New York, 641-650. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. VENKATESH, A. 1996, Computers and other interactive technologies for the home. Communication of the ACM 39, 12, 47-54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. VENKATESH, A., KRUSE, E., AND CHUAN-FONG SHIH, E. 2003. The networked home: An analysis of current developments and future trends. Cognition Technology and Work J. 5, 1, 23-32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. VENKATESH, A. 2006. Introduction to the special issue on ICT in everyday life: Home and personal environments. Information Society J. 22, 191-194.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. VEXO 2007. vexo.ruwido.com, Instruction Video. Accessed Oct. 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. VORDERER, P., KLIMMT, C., AND RITTERFELD, U. 2004. Enjoyment: At the heart of media entertainment. Communication Theory 14, 4, 388-408. http://www.asc.upenn.edu/usr/ogandy/c634/enjoyment%20vorderer.pdf/. Accessed Sept. 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Trends in the living room and beyond: results from ethnographic studies using creative and playful probing

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image Computers in Entertainment
          Computers in Entertainment   Volume 6, Issue 1
          Social television and user interaction
          January 2008
          123 pages
          EISSN:1544-3574
          DOI:10.1145/1350843
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2008 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 May 2008
          • Accepted: 1 November 2007
          • Received: 1 April 2007

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Popular
          • Editor picked

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format