skip to main content
10.1145/1357054.1357061acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

CueFlik: interactive concept learning in image search

Published:06 April 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Web image search is difficult in part because a handful of keywords are generally insufficient for characterizing the visual properties of an image. Popular engines have begun to provide tags based on simple characteristics of images (such as tags for black and white images or images that contain a face), but such approaches are limited by the fact that it is unclear what tags end users want to be able to use in examining Web image search results. This paper presents CueFlik, a Web image search application that allows end users to quickly create their own rules for re ranking images based on their visual characteristics. End users can then re rank any future Web image search results according to their rule. In an experiment we present in this paper, end users quickly create effective rules for such concepts as "product photos", "portraits of people", and "clipart". When asked to conceive of and create their own rules, participants create such rules as "sports action shot" with images from queries for "basketball" and "football". CueFlik represents both a promising new approach to Web image search and an important study in end user interactive machine learning.

References

  1. Bederson, B.B. (2001). PhotoMesa: A Zoomable Image Browser Using Quantum Treemaps and Bubblemaps. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST 2001), 71--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Cai, D., He, X., Li, Z., Ma, W.-Y. and Wen, J.-R. (2004). Hierarchical Clustering of WWW Image Search Results Using Visual, Textual, and Link Information. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Multimedia (Multimedia 2004), 952--959. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Fails, J.A. and Olsen, D.R. (2003). Interactive Machine Learning. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI 2003), 39--45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Fass, A.M., Bier, E.A. and Adar, E. (2000). PicturePiper: Using a Re-Configurable Pipeline to Find Images on the Web. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST 2000), 51--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Gajos, K. and Weld, D.S. (2004). SUPPLE: Automatically Generating User Interfaces. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI 2004), 93--100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Gajos, K. and Weld, D.S. (2005). Preference Elicitation for Interface Optimization. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST 2005), 173--182. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Globerson, A. and Roweis, S. (2005). Metric Learning by Collapsing Classes. Proceedings of the Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2005), 451--458.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Gorkani, M.M. and Picard, R.W. (1994). Texture Orientation for Sorting Photos 'At a Glance'. Proceedings of the International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR 1994), 459--464.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Hartmann, B., Abdulla, L., Mittal, M. and Klemmer, S.R. (2007). Authoring Sensor-Based Interactions by Demonstration with Direct Manipulation and Pattern Recognition. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2007), 145--154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R. and Friedman, J. (2001). The Elements of Statistical Learning. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Kristjannson, T., Culotta, A., Viola, P. and McCallum, A. (2004). Interactive Information Extraction with Constrained Conditional Random Fields. Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2004), 412--418. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Li, F.-F. and Perona, P. (2005). A Bayesian Hierarchical Model for Learning Natural Scene Categories. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2005), 524--531. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Niblack, C.W., Barber, R., Equitz, W., Flickner, M.D., Glasman, E.H., Petkovic, D., Yanker, P., Faloutsos, C. and Taubin, G. (1993). QBIC Project: Querying Images by Content, Using Color, Texture, and Shape. Proceedings of the Conference on Storage and Retrieval for Image and Video Databases 173--187.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Nistér, D. and Stewénius, H. (2006). Scalable Recognition with a Vocabulary Tree. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2006), 2161--2168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Nocedal, J. and Wright, S.J. (2006). Numerical Optimization. Science Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Platt, J.C., Czerwinski, M. and Field, B.A. (2003). PhotoTOC: Automatic Clustering for Browsing Personal Photographs. Proceedings of the IEEE Pacific Rim Conference on Multimedia 6--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Schettini, R., Ciocca, G., Valsasna, A., Brambilla, C. and De Ponti, M. (2002). A Hierarchical Classification Strategy for Digital Documents. Pattern Recognition 35(8). 1759--1769.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Shilman, M., Tan, D.S. and Simard, P. (2006). CueTIP: A Mixed-Initiative Interface for Correcting Handwriting Errors. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST 2006), 323--332. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Smeulders, A.W.M., Worring, M., Santini, S., Gupta, A. and Jain, R. (2000). Content-Based Image Retrieval at the End of the Early Years. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 22(12). 1349--1380. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Smith, J.R. and Chang, S.-F. (1997). VisualSEEK: A Fully Automated Content-Based Image Query System. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Multimedia (Multimedia 1997), 87--98. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Vailaya, A., Figueiredo, M., Jain, A. and Zhang, H.J. (1999). Content-Based Hierarchical Classification of Vacation Images. Porceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems (ICMCS 1999), 518--523. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Wang, S., Jing, F., He, J., Du, Q. and Zhang, L. (2007). IGroup: Presenting Web Image Search Results in Semantic Clusters. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2007), 587--596. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Winder, S.A. and Brown, M. (2007). Learning Local Image Descriptors. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2007), 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Yee, K.-P., Swearingen, K., Li, K. and Hearst, M. (2003). Faceted Metadata for Image Search and Browsing. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2003), 401--408. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. CueFlik: interactive concept learning in image search

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '08: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2008
      1870 pages
      ISBN:9781605580111
      DOI:10.1145/1357054

      Copyright © 2008 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 April 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '08 Paper Acceptance Rate157of714submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader