skip to main content
10.1145/1357054.1357321acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The effect of spring stiffness and control gain with an elastic rate control pointing device

Published:06 April 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Isometric and elastic devices are most compatible with a rate control mapping. However, the effect of elastic stiffness has not been thoroughly investigated nor its interaction with control gain. In a controlled experiment, these factors are investigated along with user feedback regarding ease-of-use and fatigue. The results reveal a U-shaped profile of control gain vs. movement time, with different profiles for different stiffness levels. Using the optimum control gain for each stiffness level, performance across stiffness levels were similar. However, users preferred lower stiffness and lower control gain levels due to increased controller displacement. Based on these results, design guidelines for elastic rate control devices are given.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

1357321.mp4

mp4

121 MB

References

  1. Accot, J., and Zhai, S. Scale effects in steering law tasks. In Proc. of CHI'01, 2001, pp. 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Barrett, R. C., Selker, E. J., Rutledge, J. D., and Olyha, R. S. Negative inertia: a dynamic pointing function. In Proc. of CHI'95, 1995, pp. 316--317. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Buck, L. Motor performance in relation to control-display gain and target width. Ergonomics, 32 (1980), 579--589.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Card, C., English, W., and Burr, B. Evaluation of mouse, rate controlled isometric joystick, step keys, and text keys for text selection on a crt. Ergonomics, 21 (1978), 601--613.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Casiez, G., Vogel, D., Pan, Q., and Chaillou, C. RubberEdge: reducing clutching by combining position and rate control with elastic feedback. In Proc. of UIST'07, 2007, pp. 129--138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Douglas, S. A., and Mithal, A. K. The effect of reducing homing time on the speed of a finger-controlled isometric pointing device. In Proc. of CHI'94, 1994, pp. 411--416. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Epps, B.W. Comparison of six cursor control devices based on Fitts' law models. In Proc. of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, 1986, 327--331.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Froehlich, B., Hochstrate, J., Skuk, V., and Huckauf, A. The GlobeFish and the GlobeMouse: two new six degree of freedom input devices for graphics applications. In Proc. of CHI'06, 2006, pp. 191--199. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Gibbs, C. Controller design: interactions of controlling limbs, time-lags and gain in positional and velocity systems. Ergonomics, 5 (1962), 385--402.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Jellinek, H.D., and Card, S.K. Powermice and user performance. In Proc. of CHI'90, 1990, pp. 213--220. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kantowitz, B. H., and Elvers, G. G. Fitts' law with an isometric controller. Effects of order of control and control-display gain. Journal of Motor Behavior, 20 (1988), 53--66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Kawachiya, K., and Ishikawa, H. NaviPoint: an input device for mobile information browsing. In Proc. of CHI'98, 1998, pp. 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. MacKenzie, I. S. Fitts' law as a research and design tool in human computer interaction. Human Computer Interaction, 7 (1992), 91--139.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. MacKenzie, I. S., Sellen, A., and Buxton, W. A. S. A comparison of input devices in element pointing and dragging tasks. In Proc. of CHI'91, 1991, pp. 161--166. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Mithal, A. K., and Douglas, S. A. Differences in movement microstructure of the mouse and the finger-controlled isometric joystick. In Proc. of CHI'96, 1996, pp. 300--307. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Phillips, J. D., Triggs, T. J., and Bellgrove, M. Computer Screen Cursor Trajectories as Controlled by an Accupoint: A Kinematic Analysis. In Proc. of Computer Human Interaction Conference, 1998, pp. 314--319. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Rutledge, J. D., and Selker, E. J. Controller for improved pointing devices. US Patent 5,764,219. 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Rutledge, J. D., and Selker, T. Force-to-Motion Functions for Pointing. In Proc. of Interact'90, 1990, pp. 701--706. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Sensable, Phantom haptic device, www.sensable.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Ugural, A. C., and Fenster, S. K. Advanced strength and applied elasticity. Prentice Hall PTR. 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Zhai, S., Human Performance in Six Degree of Freedom Input Control. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Toronto, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The effect of spring stiffness and control gain with an elastic rate control pointing device

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '08: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2008
      1870 pages
      ISBN:9781605580111
      DOI:10.1145/1357054

      Copyright © 2008 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 April 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '08 Paper Acceptance Rate157of714submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader