skip to main content
10.1145/1358628.1358633acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Acceptance of augmented reality instructions in a real work setting

Published: 05 April 2008 Publication History

Abstract

The differences between Augmented Reality (AR) systems and computer display based systems create a need for a different approach to the design and development of AR systems. To understand the potential of AR systems in real world tasks the technology must be tested in real world scenarios. This case study includes two qualitative user studies where AR was used for giving instructions to users in a hospital. The data show that the users in the context of medical care are positive towards AR systems as a technology and as a tool for instructions in terms of usefulness and social acceptance. The results indicate that AR technology, should it be introduced as technical support in this context, may become an accepted, and appreciated, part of every day work.

References

[1]
Azuma R. A survey of Augmented Reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. 6:4 (1997) 355--385
[2]
Azuma R, Bailot, Y., Behringer, R. Feiner, S., Simon, J. & MacIntyre, B. Recent Advances in Augmented Reality, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. Nov/ Dec 2001, 34--47
[3]
Billinghurst, M., Belcher, D. Gupta, A. and Kiyokawa, K. Communication Behaviours in Colocated Collaborative AR Interfaces. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 16 (3), (2003) 395--423
[4]
Davis, F. D. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, vol 13, no 3, (1989) 319--340
[5]
Fiala, M. ARTAG Rev2 Fiducial Marker System: Vision based Tracking for AR. Workshop of Industrial Augmented Reality, Wienna Austria Oct 4, 2005
[6]
Gustafsson, T., Carleberg, P., Svensson, P., Nilsson, S., and Sivertun, Å. Mixed Reality Systems for Technical Maintenance and Gaze-controlled interaction. FOI-R.1695-SE (Technical report ISSN 1650--1942) 2005
[7]
HITLAB, http://www.hitl.washington.edu/artoolkit/ (as of 2007--07-23)
[8]
Livingston, M. Evaluating Human Factors in Augmented Reality Systems. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications November/December 2005
[9]
Livingston, M. Julier, S.J. and Brown, D. Situation awareness for teams of dismounted warfighters and unmanned vehicles. Proceedings of SPIE, Enhanced and synthetic vision, volume 6226, 2006
[10]
Milgram, P. & Kishino, F. A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE Transactions on Information Systems, Vol E77-D, No 12 (1994) 1321--1329,
[11]
Schmalstieg, D. Rapid Prototyping of Augmented Reality Applications with the STUDIERSTUBE Framework, Workshop of Industrial Augmented Reality (IAR) Wienna, Austria Oct 4, 2005
[12]
Nilsson, S & Johansson, B. A Cognitive Systems Engineering Perspective on the Design of Mixed Reality Systems. Proc of ECCE-13, ETH Züürich (2006) 154--161,.
[13]
Träskbäck, M. User Requirements and usability of Mixed Reality applications. Licentiate Thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, 2004

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)HelpingHands: Developing Health Procedure Skills Through Augmented Reality-Based Remote Guidance2024 28th International Conference Information Visualisation (IV)10.1109/IV64223.2024.00065(338-343)Online publication date: 22-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Industry Augmented Reality Along with Artificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence‐Enabled Businesses10.1002/9781394234028.ch17(311-332)Online publication date: Dec-2024
  • (2022)In-Depth Review of Augmented Reality: Tracking Technologies, Development Tools, AR Displays, Collaborative AR, and Security ConcernsSensors10.3390/s2301014623:1(146)Online publication date: 23-Dec-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CHI EA '08: CHI '08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
April 2008
2035 pages
ISBN:9781605580128
DOI:10.1145/1358628
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 05 April 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. augmented reality
  2. human factors
  3. usability methods
  4. user interaction

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

CHI '08
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025
ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
April 26 - May 1, 2025
Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)37
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 20 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)HelpingHands: Developing Health Procedure Skills Through Augmented Reality-Based Remote Guidance2024 28th International Conference Information Visualisation (IV)10.1109/IV64223.2024.00065(338-343)Online publication date: 22-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Industry Augmented Reality Along with Artificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence‐Enabled Businesses10.1002/9781394234028.ch17(311-332)Online publication date: Dec-2024
  • (2022)In-Depth Review of Augmented Reality: Tracking Technologies, Development Tools, AR Displays, Collaborative AR, and Security ConcernsSensors10.3390/s2301014623:1(146)Online publication date: 23-Dec-2022
  • (2022)Producing and Consuming Instructional Material in Manufacturing Contexts: Evaluation of an AR-based Cyber-Physical Production System for Supporting Knowledge and Expertise SharingProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35550916:CSCW2(1-36)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
  • (2022)Augmented Reality and Artificial Intelligence in industry: Trends, tools, and future challengesExpert Systems with Applications10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118002207(118002)Online publication date: Nov-2022
  • (2021)Assisted Human-Robot-Interaction for Industrial AssemblyCompanion of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3434074.3447127(52-56)Online publication date: 8-Mar-2021
  • (2021)Learnability factors of AR usage performance: Validating through survey2021 International Conference on Software Engineering & Computer Systems and 4th International Conference on Computational Science and Information Management (ICSECS-ICOCSIM)10.1109/ICSECS52883.2021.00074(371-376)Online publication date: Aug-2021
  • (2021)MethoDIG: Eine Methode zur Digitalisierung flexibler DienstleistungsprozesseSystematische Entwicklung von Dienstleistungsinnovationen10.1007/978-3-658-31768-3_25(441-526)Online publication date: 22-Jun-2021
  • (2020)Design and Implementation of “AugMedicine: Lung Cases,” an Augmented Reality Application for the Medical Curriculum on the Presentation of DyspneaFrontiers in Virtual Reality10.3389/frvir.2020.5775341Online publication date: 28-Oct-2020
  • (2020)Social Acceptability in HCI: A Survey of Methods, Measures, and Design StrategiesProceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3313831.3376162(1-19)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2020
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media