skip to main content
10.1145/1363686.1364117acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A nervous system model for direct dynamics animation control based on evolutionary computation

Published:16 March 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we approach the relevant problem of controlling locomotion of articulated figures taking Physics into account. The model proposed in this work determines the forces that actuate the articulated figure in order to obtain a desired locomotion goal. The controller developed for that purpose is based on some of the works on control of neuro-musculoskeletal representations of articulated figures and on neural oscillators encountered in the literature. Our model, however, takes a more generic approach using evolutionary computation and is capable of automatically generating motion gaits while maintaining stability independently of the environment and of the controlled articulated figure. The limitations of the proposed controller are also discussed.

References

  1. M. V. de Panne, R. Kim, and E. Fiume. Virtual wind-up toys for animation. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface '94, pages 208--215, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. V. DeSapio, J. Warren, O. Khatib, and S. Delp. Simulating the task-level control of human motion: a methodology and framework for implementation. The Visual Computer, 21(5):289--302, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Grillner. Control of locomotion in bipeds, tetrapods and fish. Brooks VB (ed) Handbook of Phisiology, Sect I: The nervous system, vol. II: Motor Control, pages 1179--1236, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. K. Hase, K. Miyashita, S. Ok, and Y. Arakawa. Human gait simulation with a neuromusculoskeletal model and evolutionary computation. Journal of Visualization and Computer Animation, 14(2):73--92, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. K. Hase and N. Yamazaki. Computational evolution of human bipedal walking by a neuro-musculo-skeletal model. In Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Artificial Life and Robotics, pages 174--177, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Joseph Laszlo. Controlling bipedal locomotion for computer animation. MSc Thesis., University of Toronto, Department of Computer Science, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Karl Sims. Evolving Virtual Creatures. In Computer Graphics (Siggraph '94 Proceedings), pages 15--22, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. J. Koza. Genetic programming: A paradigm for genetically breeding populations of computer programs to solve problems. Technical Report STAN-CS-90-1314, Dept. of Computer Science, Stanford University, June 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. K. Matsuoka. Sustained oscillations generated by mutually inhibiting neurons with adaptation. Biological Cybernetics, 52(6):367--376, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. K. Miyashita, S. Ok, and K. Hase. Evolutionary generation of human-like bipedal locomotion. Mechatronics, 13(8--9):791--807, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. A. Nagano, B. R. Umberger, M. W. Marzke, and K. G. M. Gerritsen. Neuromusculoskeletal computer modeling and simulation of upright, straight-legged, bipedal locomotion of australopithecus afarensis (a.1.288--1). American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 126(1):2--13, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. J. Ni and A. Kato. A model of neuro-musculo-skeletal system for human locomotion under position constraint condition. ASME Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 125:499--506, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. S. Ok and D. Kim. Evolution of the CPG with sensory feedback for bipedal locomotion. In ICNC (2), pages 714--726, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. A. Prochazka. The man-machine analogy in robotics and neurophysiology. Journal of Automatic Control, 12:4--8, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. T. Reil and P. Husbands. Evolution of central pattern generators for bipedal walking in a real-time physics environment. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6(2):159--168, April 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. W. Sellers, G. Cain, W. Wang, and R. Crompton. Stride lengths, speed and energy costs in walking of Australopithecus afarensis: Using evolutionary robotics to predict locomotion of early human ancestors. J R Soc Interface, 2(5):431--441, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. R. Smith. Open Dynamics Engine (ODE). http://www.ode.org/, Visited on February 15, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. G. Taga. A model of the neuro-musculo-skeletal system for anticipatory adjustment of human locomotion during obstacle avoidance. Biological Cybernetics, 78(1):9--17, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. G. Taga, Y. Yamaguchi, and H. Shimizu. Self-organized control of bipedal locomotion by neural oscillators in unpredictable environment. Biological Cybernetics, 65(3):147--159, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. D. Whitley. A genetic algorithm tutorial. Statistics and Computing, 4:65--85, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. M. Williamson. Designing Rhythmic Motions using Neural Oscillators. In IROS, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. K. Wolff and P. Nordin. Learning biped locomotion from first principles on a simulated humanoid robot using linear genetic programming. In Genetic and Evolutionary Computation - GECCO-2003, volume 2723 of LNCS, pages 495--506. Springer-Verlag, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A nervous system model for direct dynamics animation control based on evolutionary computation

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SAC '08: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on Applied computing
          March 2008
          2586 pages
          ISBN:9781595937537
          DOI:10.1145/1363686

          Copyright © 2008 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 16 March 2008

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader