skip to main content
10.1145/1368088.1368177acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Supporting requirements engineering for medical products: early consideration of user-perceived quality

Published: 10 May 2008 Publication History

Abstract

The usability and, more generally, the overall user-perceived quality of medical devices is an important aspect, which is often insufficiently addressed in the corresponding system development activities. Fortunately, the development of new standards like IEC/DIN EN 60601-1-6 is strengthening the focus on usability / user acceptance issues. This paper argues for the need to consider usability and user acceptance issues in early system development phases like the requirements engineering phase. In this paper, an empirically validated new quality model for user satisfaction is described first. The importance of the quality aspects included in this quality model for the medical domain is outlined. Then, the new quality model is used to develop a systematic methodology called Appraisal and Measurement of User Satisfaction (AMUSE), which allows gathering user acceptance information early in system development. The key activities of the AMUSE methodology and typical application scenarios are shown. Further on, the application of AMUSE, which was developed in close cooperation with Siemens Corporate Technology, is demonstrated in a real-world scenario at Siemens Audiologische Technik, a line of business of Siemens Medical Solutions. At the end, the first lessons learned from the application of the AMUSE methodology in this medical domain are discussed.

References

[1]
Davis, F. D. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 3 (1989): 319--340.
[2]
Denger, C., Feldmann, R., Höst, M., Lindholm, C. and Shull, F. A Snapshot of the State of Practice in Software Development for Medical Devices, In Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, to appear, 2007
[3]
Denger, C., Feldmann, R., Höst, M., Lindholm, C. and Shull, F. State of the Practice in Software Development for Medical Device Production, Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering, Kaiserslautern, Germany. IESE Internal Report, 2007. (to obtain by request to the authors)
[4]
Dörr, J., Hartkopf, S., Kerkow, D., Landmann, D. and Amthor, P. Built-in User Satisfaction: Feature Appraisal and Prioritization with AMUSE. In Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE 2007) (New Delhi, India, October 15-19th, 2007). IEEE, to appear.
[5]
Hassenzahl, M., Platz, A., Burmester, M. & Lehner, K. (2000). Hedonic and ergonomic quality aspects determine a software's Appeal. Proceedings of the CHI 2000 Conference on Human Factors in Computing, The Hague, NL (pp. 201--208). New York: ACM.
[6]
Karlsson, J. and Ryan, K. Prioritizing requirements using a cost-value approach. IEEE Software, 14 (1997): 67--74.
[7]
IEC 60601-1-6 Medical electrical equipment Part 1-6: General requirements for safety - Collateral standard: Usability IEC 62304 Medical Device Software -- Software Life Cycle Processes
[8]
ISO 14971 Medical Devices -- Application of risk management to medical devices. Revision of first edition (ISO 14971:2000) and ISO 14971:2000/Amd.1:2003, Geneva, 2005
[9]
International Organization for Standardization, International Electrotechnical Commission. International Standard ISO/IEC 9126. Information technology --- Software product evaluation --- Quality characteristics and guidelines for their use. Geneva, 1991.
[10]
Patterson, P. Fitting Human Factors in the Product Development Process. Medical Device & Diagnostic Industry, 28, 1 (2006): 124--133.
[11]
Venkatesh, V. Creating Favorable User Perceptions: Exploring the Role of Intrinsic Motivation. MIS Quarterly, 23, 2 (1999): 239--260.
[12]
Wiegers, K. E. Software-Requirements. Microsoft Press, 2005.
[13]
Kline, R.B. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Second Edition, The Guilford Press, 2005

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Analyzing Healthcare and Wellness Products’ Quality Embedded in Online Customer Reviews: Assessment with a Hybrid Fuzzy LMAW and Fermatean Fuzzy WASPAS MethodSustainability10.3390/su1504342815:4(3428)Online publication date: 13-Feb-2023
  • (2020)On What Goes on With Goal-Oriented Healthcare Equipment Regulations: An Exploratory Case Study on the Diagnostic Imaging Equipment Industry in BrazilIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2020.29820318(58559-58574)Online publication date: 2020
  • (2019) How Long After Compliance Do You Benefit From Regulation? An Empirical Study on Diagnostic Imaging Equipment Requirements * 2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC)10.1109/EMBC.2019.8856338(4141-4147)Online publication date: Jul-2019
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ICSE '08: Proceedings of the 30th international conference on Software engineering
May 2008
558 pages
ISBN:9781605580791
DOI:10.1145/1368088
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 10 May 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. product innovation
  2. product management
  3. quality measurement
  4. requirements engineering
  5. requirements prioritization
  6. user satisfaction

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

ICSE '08
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

ICSE '08 Paper Acceptance Rate 56 of 370 submissions, 15%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 276 of 1,856 submissions, 15%

Upcoming Conference

ICSE 2025

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 07 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Analyzing Healthcare and Wellness Products’ Quality Embedded in Online Customer Reviews: Assessment with a Hybrid Fuzzy LMAW and Fermatean Fuzzy WASPAS MethodSustainability10.3390/su1504342815:4(3428)Online publication date: 13-Feb-2023
  • (2020)On What Goes on With Goal-Oriented Healthcare Equipment Regulations: An Exploratory Case Study on the Diagnostic Imaging Equipment Industry in BrazilIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2020.29820318(58559-58574)Online publication date: 2020
  • (2019) How Long After Compliance Do You Benefit From Regulation? An Empirical Study on Diagnostic Imaging Equipment Requirements * 2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC)10.1109/EMBC.2019.8856338(4141-4147)Online publication date: Jul-2019
  • (2016)Healthcare systems qualityProceedings of the International Workshop on Software Engineering in Healthcare Systems10.1145/2897683.2897686(50-53)Online publication date: 14-May-2016
  • (2013)Requirements engineering meets physiotherapyProceedings of the 19th international conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality10.1007/978-3-642-37422-7_23(315-330)Online publication date: 8-Apr-2013
  • (2010)The effect of color combination and attention on usability of graph reading tasks5th International Conference on Computer Sciences and Convergence Information Technology10.1109/ICCIT.2010.5711102(464-471)Online publication date: Nov-2010
  • (2009)Usability challenges in surgical simulator trainingProceedings of the ITI 2009 31st International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces10.1109/ITI.2009.5196126(455-460)Online publication date: Jun-2009

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media