skip to main content
10.1145/1368436.1368482acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesconextConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

A comparison of token-bucket based multi-color marking techniques

Published: 04 December 2006 Publication History

Abstract

During the last two decades three important architectural models were designed and standardized: the ATM reference model, the Differentiated Services (DiffServ) architecture and recently the Metro-Ethernet (MEF), the evolving Ethernet-based access network. Although the three architectures provide a substantially different networking model, they all assume inter-AS service level agreements (SLAs), where edge routers perform traffic metering or policing according to the SLA traffic parameters over an aggregate stream (An aggregate is a group of connections, for example all the connections of a small company, and the agreement controls an aggregate) and labels each packet as it arrives according to its conformance. The core routers, using e.g., active queue management mechanisms, identify the packet and react, accordingly. The different packet marking differentiates between service aggregate. All the above standards suggest multiple SLA parameters, using an average committed rate and an average peak rate, each with its own allowed amount of burstiness.

References

[1]
O. Aboul-Magd. MEF traffic management specification. Metro Ethernet Forum, May 2004.
[2]
Z. Cao, Z. Wang, and E. Zegura. Rainbow fair queuing: Fair bandwidth sharing without per-flow state. In INFOCOM, Mar. 2000.
[3]
J. Heinanen and R. Guerin. A two rate three color marker. Internet Engineering Task Force, Sept. 1999.

Cited By

View all
  • (2012)Performance evaluation of a flow control algorithm for Network-on-Chip2012 International Conference on High Performance Computing & Simulation (HPCS)10.1109/HPCSim.2012.6266925(281-287)Online publication date: Jul-2012
  1. A comparison of token-bucket based multi-color marking techniques

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CoNEXT '06: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM CoNEXT conference
    December 2006
    318 pages
    ISBN:1595934561
    DOI:10.1145/1368436
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 04 December 2006

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Poster

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 198 of 789 submissions, 25%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2012)Performance evaluation of a flow control algorithm for Network-on-Chip2012 International Conference on High Performance Computing & Simulation (HPCS)10.1109/HPCSim.2012.6266925(281-287)Online publication date: Jul-2012

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media