skip to main content
10.1145/1374296.1374334acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobimediaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Variable frame rate video for mobile devices

Published:18 September 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

In [1] we introduced a new real-time variable frame rate control scheme. It is based on the video jerkiness and it can be applied to both coding and transcoding. This scheme constantly traces the motion of the incoming video and automatically tunes the outgoing frame rate according to the level of jerkiness acceptable by the user.

This scheme has been conceived in the framework of mobile communications, which calls for an optimum use of both the available bandwidth and terminal resources.

In this paper we present a subjective assessment of our solution carried out in a professional laboratory suitably equipped. Towards this aim a group of non-expert users was asked to express their preference when watching side by side the same video coded at variable frame rate and at fixed frame rate. Results show that most of the times a variable frame rate control based on a dynamic bit/frame allocation scheme may substantially improve the video quality perceived by the users.

References

  1. R. Felice, G. Iacovoni and S. Morsa, "Quality-temporal transcoder driven by the jerkiness," ,"IEEE ICME 2005, July 2005 in press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. P. Brun, G. Hauske and T. Stockhammer, "Subjective assessment of H.264/AVC video for low-bit rate multimedia messaging services," IEEE ICIP 2004, pp. 1145--1148, October 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. G. Hauske, T. Stockhammer and R. Hofmaier, "Subjective image quality for low-rate and low-resolution video sequences," MoMuC 2003, October 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Y. Wang, S.-F. Chang and A. C. Loui, "Subjective preference of spatio- temporal rate in video adaptation using multi-dimensional scalable coding," IEEE ICME 2004, vol.3, pp. 1719--1722, June 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. G. Yadavalli, M. Masry and S. S. Hemami, "Frame rate preferences in low bit rate video," IEEE ICIP 2003, pp. 441--444, September 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ö. D. Önür and A. A. Alatan, "Video adaptation for transmission channel by utility modelling", IEEE ICME 2005, July 2005 in press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. K.-T. Fung, Y.-L. Chan, W. C. Siu, "New architecture for dynamic frame-skipping transcoder," IEEE Trans. On Image Processing, vol. 11, pp. 886--900, August 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. J. Ribas-Corbera and S. Lei, "Rate control in DCT video coding for low-delay communications," IEEE Trans. On Circuit and Systems for Video Technology", vol. 9, pp. 172--185, February 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. http://media.xiph.org/video/derf/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. ITU-T Recommendation P.910 "Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications"Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. ITU-T Recommendation P.911 "Subjective audiovisual quality assessment methods for multimedia applications"Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. ITU-R Recommendation BT.500 "Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures"Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. J. Mullin, L. Smallwood, A. Watson and G. Wilson, "New techniques for assessing audio and video quality in real time interactive communications," IHM-HCI Tutorial 2001, September 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    MobiMedia '06: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Mobile multimedia communications
    September 2006
    281 pages
    ISBN:1595935177
    DOI:10.1145/1374296

    Copyright © 2006 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 18 September 2006

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader