skip to main content
10.1145/1378600.1378605acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobisysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The pothole patrol: using a mobile sensor network for road surface monitoring

Published:17 June 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper investigates an application of mobile sensing: detecting and reporting the surface conditions of roads. We describe a system and associated algorithms to monitor this important civil infrastructure using a collection of sensor-equipped vehicles. This system, which we call the Pothole Patrol (P2), uses the inherent mobility of the participating vehicles, opportunistically gathering data from vibration and GPS sensors, and processing the data to assess road surface conditions. We have deployed P2 on 7 taxis running in the Boston area. Using a simple machine-learning approach, we show that we are able to identify potholes and other severe road surface anomalies from accelerometer data. Via careful selection of training data and signal features, we have been able to build a detector that misidentifies good road segments as having potholes less than 0.2% of the time. We evaluate our system on data from thousands of kilometers of taxi drives, and show that it can successfully detect a number of real potholes in and around the Boston area. After clustering to further reduce spurious detections, manual inspection of reported potholes shows that over 90% contain road anomalies in need of repair.

References

  1. N. Angelini, J. Brache, M. Gdula, and G. Shevlin. Gps coordinate pothole mapping. Technical report, Worchester Polytechnic, 2006. http://users.wpi.edu/~sageman/mqp/docs/executive-summary.doc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. J. Burke, D. Estrin, M. Hansen, A. Parker, N. Ramanathan, S. Reddy, and M. Srivastava. Participatory Sensing. In World Sensor Web Workshop, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. G. Chen, M. Li, and D. Kotz. Design and implementation of a large-scale context fusion network. In Mobiquitous, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. D. Chu, K. Lin, A. Linares, G. Nguyen, and J. M. Hellerstein. SDLIB: a sensor network data and communications library for rapid and robust application development. In IPSN '06, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. H. Cohen, H. Lei, P. Castro, J. S. D. II, and A. Purakayastha. Composing pervasive data using iQL. In WMCSA, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. R. Eaton, R. Joubert, and E. Wright. Pothole primer: A public administrator's guide to understanding and managing the pothole problem. Technical Report 81-21, US Army Corps of Engineers, Cold Regions Research & Engineering Laboratory, 1989. http://www.crrel.usace.army.mil/techpub/CRREL_Reports/reports/SR81-21.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. O. Gnawali, K.-Y. Jang, J. Paek, M. Vieira, R. Govindan, B. Greenstein, A. Joki, D. Estrin, and E. Kohler. The tenet architecture for tiered sensor networks. In SenSys, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. B. Greenstein, E. Kohler, and D. Estrin. A sensor network application construction kit (SNACK). In SenSys, pages 69--80, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. B. Greenstein, C. Mar, A. Pesterev, S. Farshchi, E. Kohler, J. Judy, and D. Estrin. Capturing high-frequency phenomena using a bandwidth-limited sensor network. In SenSys, pages 279--292, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. B. Hull, V. Bychkovsky, Y. Zhang, K. Chen, M. Goraczko, E. Shih, H. Balakrishnan, and S. Madden. CarTel: A Distributed Mobile Sensor Computing System. In Proc. ACM SenSys, Nov. 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. D. R. Huston, N. V. Pelczarski, B. Esser, and K. R. Maser. Damage detection in roadways with ground penetrating radar. In International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, volume 4084, pages 91--94, Apr. 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. J. Karuppuswamy, V. Selvaraj, M. M. Ganesh, and E. L. Hall. Detection and avoidance of simulated potholes in autonomous vehicle navigation in an unstructured environment. Intelligent Robots and Computer Vision XIX: Algorithms, Techniques, and Active Vision, 4197(1):70--80, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. M. Kestler. Current and proposed practices for nondestructive highway pavement testing. Technical Report 97-28, US Army Corps of Engineers, Cold Regions Research & Engineering Laboratory, 1997. http://www.crrel.usace.army.mil/techpub/CRREL_Reports/reports/SR97_28.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. D. Kil and F. Shin. Automatic road-distress classification and identification using a combination of hierarchical classifiers and expert systems-subimage and object processing. In International Conference on Image Processing, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. U. Lee, E. Magistretti, B. Zhou, M. Gerla, P. Bellavista, and A. Corradi. MobEyes: Smart Mobs for Urban Monitoring with a Vehicular Sensor Network. IEEE Wireless Communications, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. S. Madden, M. Franklin, J. Hellerstein, and W. Hong. Tag: A tiny aggregation service for ad-hoc sensor networks. In OSDI, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. R. Newton, G. Morrisett, and M. Welsh. The regiment macroprogramming system. In IPSN, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. V. Rouillard. Remote monitoring of vehicle shock and vibrations. Packaging Technology and Science, 15(2):83--92, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. M. Welsh and G. Mainland. Programming sensor networks using abstract regions. In NSDI, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. K. Whitehouse, F. Zhao, and J. Liu. Semantic streams: A framework for composable semantic interpretation of sensor data. In EWSN, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The pothole patrol: using a mobile sensor network for road surface monitoring

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        MobiSys '08: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services
        June 2008
        304 pages
        ISBN:9781605581392
        DOI:10.1145/1378600

        Copyright © 2008 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 17 June 2008

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate274of1,679submissions,16%

        Upcoming Conference

        MOBISYS '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader