skip to main content
10.1145/1389095.1389129acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

On the evolution of motility and intelligent tactic response

Published:12 July 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present our first results concerning the de novo evolution of motility and tactic response in systems of digital organisms. Our model organism was E. coli and the behavior of interest was gradient following, since this represents simple decision-making. Our first experiments demonstrated the evolution of a tactic response, both when provided with a hand-coded system to remember previous gradient concentrations and without this crutch where the organisms must determine how to store previous values on their own. In our second set of experiments we investigated two different rotation strategies, random and systematic, and found no significant performance difference between the two strategies. These experiments served as a stepping-stone and proof-of-concept of the infrastructure needed for our future work on the evolution of simple intelligence.

References

  1. C. Adami, C. A. Ofria, and T. C. Collier. Evolution of biological complexity. Proceedings of the Natlional Academy of Science, 97:4463--4468, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. J. Adler. Chemotaxis in bacteria. Science, 153(3737):708--716, August 12 1966.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. J. Adler. Chemotaxis in bacteria. Annual Review of Biochemistry, 44:341--356, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. J. Adler. Primitive sensory and communication systems: the taxes and tropisms of micro-organisms and cells, chapter Chemotaxis in bacteria, pages 91--100. Academic Press, London, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. J. Ayers, J. Witting, N. McGruer, C. Olcott, and D. Massa. Lobster robots. In T. Wu and K. N, editors, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Aqua Biomechanisms, Tokai University, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. R. D. Beer and J. C. Gallagher. Evolving dynamical neural networks for adaptive behavior. Adaptive Behavior, 1(1):91--122, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. H. C. Berg. E. coli in motion. Springer, New York, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. H. C. Berg and D. A. Brown. Chemotaxis in \textitEscherichia coli analysed by three-dimensional tracking. Nature, 239:500--504, 27 October 1972.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. V. Braitenberg. Vehicles: experiments in synthetic psychology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. K. L. Briggman, H. D. I. Arbanel, and W. B. Kristan Jr. Optical imaging of neural populations during decision-making. Science, 307(5711):896--901, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. M. J. Carlile. Primitive sensory and communication systems: the taxes and tropisms of micro-organisms and cells, chapter Taxes and tropisms: diversity, biological significance and evolution, pages 1--28. Academic Press, London, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. A. L. Christensen and M. Dorigo. Evolving an integrated phototaxis and hole-avoidance behavior for a swarm-bot. In L. M. Rocha, L. S. Yaeger, M. A. Bedau, D. Floreano, R. L. Goldstone, and A. Vespignani, editors, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on the Simulation and Synthesis of Living Systems (Alife X), pages 248--254. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. J. D. E. Koshland. A model regulatory system: bacterial chemotaxis. Physiological Reviews, 59(4):811--862, October 1979.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. D. C. Dennett. The new replicators. In M. Pagel, editor, Encyclopedia of Evolution, pages E83--E92. Oxford University Press, New York, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. A. Dhariwal, G. Sukhatme, and A. A. Requicha. Bacterium-inspired robots for environmental monitoring. In Proceedings of 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 1436--1443, New Orleans, LA, April 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. M. Eyiyurekli, P. I. Lelkes, and D. E. Breen. A computational system for investigating chemotaxis-based cell aggregation. In F. A. e Costa, L. M. Rocha, E. Costa, I. Harvey, and A. Coutinho, editors, Advances in Artificial Life, 9th European Conference, ECAL 2007, Lisbon, Portugal, September 10-14, 2007, Proceedings ECAL, number 4648 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 1034--1049. Springer, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. D. Floreano and F. Mondada. Evolutionary neurocontrollers for autonomous mobile robots. Neural Networks, 11:1461--1478, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. F. W. Grasso, T. R. Consi, D. C. Mountain, and J. Atema. Biomimetic lobster performs chemo-orientation in turbulence using a pair of spatially separated sensors: progress and challenges. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 30:115--131, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. J. Kodjabachian and J.-A. Meyer. Evolution and development of neural controllers for locomotion, gradient-following, and obstacle-avoidance in artificial insects. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 9(5):796--812, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. R. E. Lenski, C. Ofria, R. T. Pennock, and C. Adami. The evolutionary origin of complex features. Nature, 423:139--144, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. T. M. Morse, S. R. Lockery, and T. C. Ferrée. Robust spatial navigation in a robot inspired by chemotaxis in \textitCaenorhabditis elegans. Adaptive Behavior, 6:393--410, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. C. Ofria, C. Adami, and T. C. Collier. Design of evolvable computer languages. IEEE Transactions in Evolutionary Computation, 17:528--532, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. C. Ofria and C. O. Wilke. Avida: a software platform for research in computational evolutionary biology. In Artificial Life 10, pages 191--229, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. M. D. Onsum and A. P. Arkin. Autonomous mobile robot control based on white blood cell chemotaxis. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3082:9--19, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. G. W. Ordal. Bacterial chemotaxis: a primitive sensory system. BioScience, 30(6):408--411, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. T. Sharpe and B. Webb. Simulated and situated models of chemical trail following in ants. In R. Pfeifer, B. Blumberg, J.-A. Meyer, and S. W. Wilson, editors, From animals to animats 5: proceedings of the fifth international conference on simulation of adaptive behavior, pages 195--204, Cambridge, MA, 1998. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. H. A. Simon. Models of man--social and rational. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1957.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. O. S. Soyer, T. Pfeiffer, and S. Bonhoeffer. Simulating the evolution of signal transduction pathways. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 241:223--232, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. R. A. Watson, S. G. Ficici, and J. B. Pollack. Embodied evolution: embodying an evolutionary algorithm in a population of robots. In P. J. Angeline, Z. Michalewicz, M. Schoenauer, X. Yao, and A. Zalzala, editors, Proceedings of the Congress on Evolutionary Computation, volume 1, pages 335--342, Mayflower Hotel, Washington D.C., USA, 6-9 1999. IEEE Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. B. Webb. Robotic experiments in cricket phonotaxis. In D. Cliff, P. Husbands, J. Meyer, and S. Wilson, editors, From animals to animats 3: proceedings of the fifth international conference on simulation of adaptive behavior, Cambridge, MA, 1994. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. B. Webb. Using robots to model animals: a cricket test. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 16:117--134, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. B. Webb. Robots, crickets and ants: models of neural control of chemotaxis and phonotaxis. Neural Networks, 11:1479--1496, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. On the evolution of motility and intelligent tactic response

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        GECCO '08: Proceedings of the 10th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
        July 2008
        1814 pages
        ISBN:9781605581309
        DOI:10.1145/1389095
        • Conference Chair:
        • Conor Ryan,
        • Editor:
        • Maarten Keijzer

        Copyright © 2008 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 12 July 2008

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

        Upcoming Conference

        GECCO '24
        Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
        July 14 - 18, 2024
        Melbourne , VIC , Australia

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader