skip to main content
10.1145/1389095.1389281acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Graph-theoretic measure for active iGAs: interaction sizing and parallel evaluation ensemble

Authors Info & Claims
Published:12 July 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Since their inception, active interactive genetic algorithms have successfully combat user evaluation fatigue induced by repetitive evaluation. Their success originates on building models of the user preferences based on partial-order graphs to create a numeric synthetic fitness. Active interactive genetic algorithms can easily reduce up to seven times the number of evaluations required from the user by optimizing such a synthetic fitness. However, despite basic understanding of the underlying mechanisms there is still a lack of principled understanding of what properties make a partial ordering graph a successful model of user preferences. Also, there has been little research conducted about how to integrate together the contributions of different users to successfully capitalize on parallelized evaluation schemes. This paper addresses both issues describing: (1) what properties make a partial-order graph successful and accurate, and (2) how partial-order graphs obtained from different users can be merged meaningfully.

References

  1. Alías, F., Llorà, X., Formiga, L., Sastry, K., and D.E., G. Efficient interactive weight tuning for TTS synthesis: reducing user fatigue by improving user consistency. In Proceedings of ICASSP (Toulouse, France, May 2006), vol. I, pp. 865--868.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Alm, C. O., and Llorà, X. Evolving emotional prosody. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (INTERSPEECH 2006) (2006), p. paper 1741.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Caldwell, C., and Johnston, V. S. Tracking a criminal suspect through face-space with a genetic algorithm. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms (1991), Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 416--421.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Clark, J., and Holton, D. A. A First Look at Graph Theory. World Scientific, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Coello-Coello, C. A. An updated survey of GA-Based Multiobjective Optimization Techniques. Technical report lania-rd-09-08, Laboratorio Nacional de Informática Avanzada (LANIA), Xalapa, Veracruz, México, December, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Cristianini, N., and Shawe-Taylor, J. An Introduction to Support Vector Machines. Cambridge Press, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Dawkins, R. The blind watchmaker. New York: W. W. Norton, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Deb, K., Agrawal, S., Pratab, A., and Meyarivan, T. A Fast Elitist Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm for Multi-Objective Optimization: NSGA-II. KanGAL report 200001, Indian Institute of Technology, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Formiga, L., and Alías, F. Extracting user Preferences by GTM for aiGA Weight Tuning in Unit Selection Text-to-Speech Synthesis. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4507 (June 2007), 654--651. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Goldberg, D. E. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Adison-Wesley, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Goldberg, D. E. The design of innovation: Lessons from and for competent genetic algorithms. Kluwe Academic Publisher, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Goldberg, D. E., Korb, B., and Deb, K. Messy genetic algorithms: Motivation, analysis, and first results. Complex Systems 3, 5 (1989), 493--530.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Harary, F. Graph Theory. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1971.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Harik, G., Lobo, F., and Goldberg, D. E. The compact genetic algorithm. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation (1998), 523--528. (Also IlliGAL Report No. 97006).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Llorà, X., Goldberg, D. E., Ohsawa, Y., Matsumura, N., Washida, Y., Tamura, H., Yoshikawa, M., Welge, M., Auvil, L., Searsmith, D., Ohnishi, K., and Chao, C.-J. Innovation and Creativity Support via Chance Discovery, Genetic Algorithms, and Data Mining. Journal of New Mathematics and Natural Computation 2, 1 (2006), 85--100.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Llorà, X., Sastry, K., Alıas, F., Goldberg, D. E., and Welge, M. Analyzing active interactive genetic algorithms using visual analytics. In GECCO '06: Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation (New York, NY, USA, 2006), ACM, pp. 1417--1418. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Llorà, X., Sastry, K., Goldberg, D. E., Gupta, A., and Lakshmi, L. Combating user fatigue in iGAs: Partial ordering, support vector machines, and synthetic fitness. In Proceedings of Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference 2005 (GECCO'05) (Washington DC, USA, June 2005), ACM, pp. 1363--1370. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Mitchell, T. M. Machine Learning. McGraw Hill, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Sastry, K. Evaluation-relaxation schemes for genetic and evolutionary algorithms. Master's thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, General Engineering Department, Urbana, IL, 2001. (Also IlliGAL Report No. 2002004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Shawe-Taylor, J., and Cristianini, N. Kernel Methods for Patter Analysis. Cambridge Press, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Takagi, H. Interactive evolutionary computation: Fusion of the capabilities of ec optimization and human evaluation. In Proceedings of the IEEE (September 2001), vol. 89, pp. 1275--1296.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Witten, I. H., and Frank, E. Data Mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques with java implementations. Morgan Kaufmann, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Graph-theoretic measure for active iGAs: interaction sizing and parallel evaluation ensemble

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        GECCO '08: Proceedings of the 10th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
        July 2008
        1814 pages
        ISBN:9781605581309
        DOI:10.1145/1389095
        • Conference Chair:
        • Conor Ryan,
        • Editor:
        • Maarten Keijzer

        Copyright © 2008 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 12 July 2008

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

        Upcoming Conference

        GECCO '24
        Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
        July 14 - 18, 2024
        Melbourne , VIC , Australia
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader