skip to main content
10.1145/1389095.1389390acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Eye on the prize: using overt visual attention to drive fitness for interactive evolutionary computation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:12 July 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Interactive Evolutionary Computation (IEC) has been applied to art and design problems where the fitness of an individual is at least partially subjective. Applications usually present a population from which the preferred individuals are selected before the usual evolutionary operations are performed to produce the next generation. Large population sizes and numbers of generations impose significant demands on the user. This paper proposes that selecting by means of eye movements could reduce user fatigue without sacrificing quality of fitness assessment. In the first experiment, an eye-tracker is used to capture fixations and confirm the reliability of such a measure of attention as a fitness driver for subjective evaluation such as aesthetic preference. In a second experiment, the robustness and efficiency of this technique is investigated for varying population sizes, presentation durations and levels of fitness sampling. The results and their consequences for future IEC applications are discussed.

References

  1. Bentley, P. J. 1996. Generic Evolutionary Design of Solid Objects using a Genetic Algorithm. Huddersfield, University of Huddersfield. PhD.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Funes, P., and Pollack, J. 1999. Computer Evolution of Buildable Objects. Evolutionary Design by Computers. ed. P.J. Bentley. pp.387--404. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Todd, S., and Latham, W. Evolutionary Art and Computers. Academic Press, Inc. 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Sims, K. 1991. Artificial Evolution for Computer Graphics. Computer Graphics, 25, 319--328. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Machwe A. T., and Parmee I. C. 2006. Integrating Aesthetic Criteria with Evolutionary Processes in Complex, Free-form Design - an Initial Investigation. IEEE Congress on Computational Intelligence, Vancouver, Canada.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Takagi, H. (2001). Interactive evolutionary computation: Fusion of the capabilities of EC optimization and human evaluation. Proceedings of the IEEE, 89 (9), 1275--1296.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Quiroz, J. C., Louis, S.J., and Dascalu, S.M. 2007. Interactive Evolution of XUL User Interfaces. Proceedings of Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference 2007, University College London. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Machwe,A. T, Parmee I. C,. 2006. Introducing Machine-learning within an Interactive Evolutionary Design. Environment. Design 2006. Dubrovnik, Croatia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Findlay, J.M and Gilchrist, I.D. 2003. Active vision: The psychology of looking and seeing. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Snodgrass, J.G. 1975. Psychophysics. In: Experimental Sensory Psychology. B Scharf. (Ed.) pp. 17--67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Holmes, T., and Zanker, J. 2007. Evolving the Golden Ratio: A new method for an old question of aesthetic perception, Perception. Pion 36: 107Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Wolfe, J.M. 1994. Guided search 2.0 - a revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 202--238.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., Dascola, I., and Umiltà, C. 1987. Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical medians - evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia, 25, 31--40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Klein, R.M. and Farrell, M. 1989. Search performance without eye-movements. Perception and Psychophysics, 46, 476--482.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Livio, M. 2002. The golden ratio: the story of phi, the extraordinary number of nature, art and beauty. London: Headline Review.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Green, C.D. 1995. All That Gltters: A Review of Psychological Research on the Aesthetics of the Golden Section, Perception. Pion, 24, 937--968.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Goldberg, D. E. 1989. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. Boston, Addison Wesley Longman Inc. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Beyer, H.-G, and Schwefel, H.-P. 2002. Natural Computing 1: 3--52 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Joseph, J.S., and Optican, L.M. 1996. Involuntary attentional shifts due to orientation differences. Perception and Psychophysics,58(5), 651--665Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Goldberg D.E., and Deb K. 1991. A comparative analysis of selection schemes used in genetic algorithms. Proceedings of Foundations of Genetic Algorithms FOGA-I. ed. G. Rawlings. pp.69--93. Morgan Kaufmann.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Miller, B.L., and Goldberg, D.E. 1995. Genetic Algorithms, Tournament Selection, and the Effects of Noise, IlliGAL Report No.95006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Pallez, D., Collard, P., Baccino, T., and Dumercy, L. 2007. Eye-Tracking Evolutionary Algorithm to Minimize User Fatigue in IEC Applied to Interactive One-Max Problem. Proceedings of Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference 2007, University College London. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Deb, K. 2001. Multi-objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms. Chichester: Wiley. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Eye on the prize: using overt visual attention to drive fitness for interactive evolutionary computation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        GECCO '08: Proceedings of the 10th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
        July 2008
        1814 pages
        ISBN:9781605581309
        DOI:10.1145/1389095
        • Conference Chair:
        • Conor Ryan,
        • Editor:
        • Maarten Keijzer

        Copyright © 2008 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 12 July 2008

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

        Upcoming Conference

        GECCO '24
        Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
        July 14 - 18, 2024
        Melbourne , VIC , Australia

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader