skip to main content
10.1145/1389908.1389941acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesduxConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Responsibilities and implications: further thoughts on ethnography and design

Published:05 November 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

Many researchers and practitioners in user experience design have turned towards social sciences to find ways to understand the social contexts in which both users and technologies are embedded. Ethnographic approaches are increasingly prominent as means by which this might be accomplished. However, a very wide range of forms of social investigation travel under the "ethnography" banner in HCI, suggesting that there is still considerable debate over what ethnography is and how it can best be employed in design contexts.

Building on earlier discussions and debates around ethnography and its implications, this paper explores how ethnographic methods might be consequential for design. In particular, it illustrates the implications for design that might be derived from classical ethnographic material and shows that these may not be of the form that HCI research normally imagines or expects.

References

  1. Abu-Lughod, A. 2000. Veiled Sentiments: Honor and Poetry in a Bedouin Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Boehner, K., DePaula, R., Dourish, P., and Sengers, P. 2005. Affect: From Information to Interaction. Proc. Critical Computing: Fourth Decennial Aarhus Conference (Aarhus, Denmark). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Brewer, J., Bassoli, A., Martin, K., Dourish, P., and Mainwaring, S. In press. Aesthetic Journeys: Rethinking Urban Computing. IEEE Pervasive Computing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Castells, M. 1989. The Informational City: Information Technology, Economic Restructuring, and the Urban Regional Process. Oxford: Blackwell.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Cresswell, T. 2006. On the Move: Mobility in the Modern Western World. London: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Dourish, P. 2006. Implications for Design. Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2006 (Montreal, Canada), 541--550. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Hill, R. 1995. Blackfellas and Whitefellas: Aboriginal Land Rights, The Mabo Decision, and the Meaning of Land. Human Rights Quarterly, 17(2), 303--322.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Keesing, R. 1974. Theories of Culture. Annual Reviews in Anthropology, 3, 73--97.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Lutz, C. 1986. Emotion, Thought, and Estrangement: Emotion as a Cultural Category. Cultural Anthropology, 1(3), 287--309.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Lutz, C. 1988. Unnatural Emotions: Everyday Sentiments on an Micronesian Atoll and their Challenge to Western Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Malkki, L. 1992. National Geographic: The Rootedness of Peoples and the Territorialization of National Identity Amongst Scholars and Refugees. Cultural Anthropology, 7(1), 24--44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Malkki, L. 1995. Purity and Exile: Memory and National Cosmology amongst Hutu Refugees in Tanzania. Chicago.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Marcus, G. 1995. Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95--117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Munn, N. 1996. Excluded Spaces: The Figure in the Australian Aboriginal Landscape. Critical Inquiry, 22(3), 446--465.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Myers, F. 1979. Emotions and the Self: A Theory of Personhood and Political Order amongst Pintupi Aboriginals. Ethos, 7(4), 343--370.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Norman, D. 2004. Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. Basic Books.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Ortner, S. 1984. Theory in Anthropology since the Sixties. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 26(1), 126--166.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Picard, R. 1997. Affective Computing. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Rosaldo, M. 1983. The Shame of Headhunters and the Autonomy of Self. Ethos, 11(3), 135--151.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Smith, B. C. 1996. On the Origin of Objects. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Turnbull, D. 2000. Masons, Tricksters, and Cartographers: Comparative Studies in the Sociology of Scientific and Indigenous Knowledge. Amsterdam: Harwood.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Verran, H. 1998. Re-imagining Land Ownership in Australia. Postcolonial Studies, 1(2), 237--254.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Yengoyan, A. 1986. Theory in Anthropology: The Demise of the Concept of Culture. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 28(2), 368--374.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    DUX '07: Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Designing for User eXperiences
    November 2007
    279 pages
    ISBN:9781605583082
    DOI:10.1145/1389908

    Copyright © 2007 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 5 November 2007

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate59of59submissions,100%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader