skip to main content
10.1145/1400751.1400782acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespodcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

On the effect of the deployment setting on broadcasting in Euclidean radio networks

Published:18 August 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

The paper studies broadcasting in radio networks whose stations are represented by points in the Euclidean plane. In any given time step, a station can either receive or transmit. A message transmitted from station (v) is delivered to every station (u) at distance at most (1) from (v), but (u) successfully hears the message if and only if (v) is the only station at distance at most (1) from (u) that transmitted in this time step. A designated source station has a message that should be disseminated throughout the network. All stations other than the source are initially idle and wake up upon the first time they hear the source message.

It is shown in [11] that the time complexity of broadcasting depends on two parameters of the network, namely, its diameter (in hops) (D) and a lower bound (d) on the Euclidean distance between any two stations. The inverse of (d) is called the granularity of the network, denoted by (g). Specifically, the authors of [11] present a broadcasting algorithm that works in time (O (D g)) and prove that every broadcasting algorithm requires Ω (D √g) time. In this paper, we distinguish between the arbitrary deployment setting, originally studied in [11], in which stations can be placed everywhere in the plane, and the new grid deployment setting, in which stations are only allowed to be placed on a (d)-spaced grid. Does the latter (more restricted) setting provides any speedup in broadcasting time complexity? Although the (O (D g)) broadcasting algorithm of [11] works under the (original) arbitrary deployment setting, it turns out that the Ω (D √g) lower bound remains valid under the grid deployment setting. Still, the above question is left unanswered. The current paper answers this question affirmatively by presenting a provable separation between the two deployment settings. We establish a tight lower bound on the time complexity of broadcasting under the arbitrary deployment setting proving that broadcasting cannot be completed in less than Ω ( D √g) time. For the grid deployment setting, we develop a broadcasting algorithm that runs in time O ( D g5 / 6 log g), thus breaking the linear dependency on (g).

References

  1. N. Alon, A. Bar-Noy, N. Linial and D. Peleg. A lower bound for radio broadcast. J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 43(2):290--298, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. R. Bar-Yehuda, O. Goldreich and A. Itai. On the time-complexity of broadcast in multi-hop radio networks: an exponential gap between determinism and randomization. J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 45(1):104--126, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. I. Chlamtac and S. Kutten. On broadcasting in radio networks--problem analysis and protocol design. IEEE Trans. on Communications, 33:1240--1246, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. I. Chlamtac and O. Weinstein. The wave expansion approach to broadcasting in multihop radio networks. IEEE Trans. on Communications, 39(3):426--433, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. B. S. Chlebus, L. Gasieniec, A. Ostlin and J. M. Robson. Deterministic Radio Broadcasting. In Proc. International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP), 717--728, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. Chrobak, L. Gasieniec and W. Rytter. Fast Broadcasting and Gossiping in Radio Networks. In Proc. IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 575--581, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. A. E. F. Clementi, A. Monti and R. Silvestri. Selective families, superimposed codes, and broadcasting on unknown radio networks. In Proc. ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), 709--718, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. A. Czumaj and W. Rytter. Broadcasting algorithms in radio networks with unknown topology. In Proc. IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 492--501, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. A. Dessmark and A. Pelc. Broadcasting in geometric radio networks. J. Discrete Algorithms, 5(1):187--201, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. Elkin and G. Kortsarz. Improved schedule for radio broadcast. In Proc. ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), 222--231, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Y. Emek, L. Gasieniec, E. Kantor, A. Pelc, D. Peleg and C. Su. Broadcasting in UDG radio networks with unknown topology. In Proc. ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC), 195--204, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. I. Gaber and Y. Mansour. Centralized broadcast in multihop radio networks. J. Algorithms, 46(1):1--20, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. L. Gasieniec, D. Peleg and Q. Xin. Faster communication in known topology radio networks. In Proc. ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC), 129--137, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. D. R. Kowalski and A. Pelc. Time of deterministic broadcasting in radio networks with local knowledge. SIAM J. on Computing, 33:870--891, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. D. R. Kowalski and A. Pelc. Broadcasting in undirected ad hoc radio networks. Distributed Computing, 18(1):43--57, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. D. R. Kowalski and A. Pelc. Optimal deterministic broadcasting in known topology radio networks. Distributed Computing, 19(3):185--195, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. E. Kushilevitz and Y. Mansour. An (Ω (D log (N / D)) ) lower bound for broadcast in radio networks. SIAM J. Comput., 27(3):702--712, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. T. Moscibroda and R. Wattenhofer. Maximal independent sets in radio networks. In Proc. ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC), 148--157, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. T. Moscibroda and R. Wattenhofer. Coloring unstructured radio networks. In Proc. ACM Symposium on Parallel Algorithms (SPAA), 39--48, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. On the effect of the deployment setting on broadcasting in Euclidean radio networks

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        PODC '08: Proceedings of the twenty-seventh ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing
        August 2008
        474 pages
        ISBN:9781595939890
        DOI:10.1145/1400751

        Copyright © 2008 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 18 August 2008

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate740of2,477submissions,30%

        Upcoming Conference

        PODC '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader