skip to main content
10.1145/1401890.1401963acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Mobile call graphs: beyond power-law and lognormal distributions

Published:24 August 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

We analyze a massive social network, gathered from the records of a large mobile phone operator, with more than a million users and tens of millions of calls. We examine the distributions of the number of phone calls per customer; the total talk minutes per customer; and the distinct number of calling partners per customer. We find that these distributions are skewed, and that they significantly deviate from what would be expected by power-law and lognormal distributions.

To analyze our observed distributions (of number of calls, distinct call partners, and total talk time), we propose PowerTrack , a method which fits a lesser known but more suitable distribution, namely the Double Pareto LogNormal (DPLN) distribution, to our data and track its parameters over time. Using PowerTrack , we find that our graph changes over time in a way consistent with a generative process that naturally results in the DPLN distributions we observe. Furthermore, we show that this generative process lends itself to a natural and appealing social wealth interpretation in the context of social networks such as ours. We discuss the application of those results to our model and to forecasting.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p596-seshadri_400h.mov

mov

57 MB

References

  1. L. A. Adamic and B. A. Huberman. The Web-shidden order. Communications of the ACM, 44(9):55--60, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. L. A. N. Amaral, A. Scala, M. Barthélémy, and H. E. Stanley. Classes of small-world networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(21):11149--11152, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. A.-L. Barabási and R. Albert. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286:509--512, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Z. Bi, C. Faloutsos, and F. Korn. The DGX distribution for mining massive, skewed data. In Proceedings of ACM KDD, pages 17--26, New York, NY, 2001. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. P. Boldi, B. Codenotti, M. Santini, and S. Vigna. Structural properties of the African Web. In International World Wide Web Conference, New York, NY, 2002. ACM Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. A. Z. Broder, R. Kumar, F. Maghoul, P. Raghavan, S. Rajagopalan, R. Stata, A. Tomkins, and J. Wiener. Graph structure in the web: experiments and models. In International World Wide Web Conference, New York, NY, 2000. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. A. Clauset. Power law distributions in empirical data. http://www.santafe.edu/~aaronc/powerlaws/ Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. A. Clauset, C. R. Shalizi, and M. E. J. Newman. Power-law distributions in empirical data. ArXiv e-print 0706.1062v1, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. C. Cortes, D. Pregibon, and C. Volinsky. Communities of interest. In IDA '01: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Advances in Intelligent Data Analysis, pages 105--114, London, UK, 2001. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. Faloutsos, P. Faloutsos, and C. Faloutsos. On power-law relationships of the Internet topology. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM, pages 251--262, New York, NY, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. R. Govindan and H. Tangmunarunkit. Heuristics for Internet map discovery. In IEEE INFOCOM, pages 1371--1380, Los Alamitos, CA, March 2000. IEEE Computer Society Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. J.-P. Onnela, J. Saramaäki, J. Hyvöven, G. Szabó, M. Argollo de Menezes, K. Kaski, and A.-L. Barabási. Structure and Tie Strengths in Mobile Communication Networks. New Journal of Physics, 9, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. S. Keshav. Why cell phones will dominate the future Internet. Computer Communications Review, 35(2), April 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. S. R. Kumar, P. Raghavan, S. Rajagopalan, and A. Tomkins. Extracting large-scale knowledge bases from the web. VLDB, pages 639--650, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. M. Mitzenmacher. A Brief History of Generative Models for Power Law and Lognormal Distributions. Internet Mathematics, 1(2):226--251.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. M. Mitzenmacher. Dynamic Models for File Sizes and Double Pareto Distributions. Internet Mathematics, 1(3):305--334, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. A. A. Nanavati, S. Gurumurthy, G. Das, D. Chakraborty, K. Dasgupta, S. Mukherjea, and A. Joshi. On the structural properties of massive telecom call graphs : findings and implications. Proc. of 15th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pages 435--444, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. M. E. J. Newman. Power laws, pareto distributions and Zipf's law. Contemporary Physics, 46:323--351, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. M. E. J. Newman. Power laws, pareto distributions and Zipf's law. Contemporary Physics, 46:323--351, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. V. Pareto. Oeuvres Completes. Droz, Geneva, 1896.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. D. M. Pennock, G. W. Flake, S. Lawrence, E. J. Glover, and C. L. Giles. Winners don't take all: Characterizing the competition for links on the Web. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(8):5207--5211, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. S. Redner. How popular is your paper? an empirical study of the citation distribution. The European Physics Journal B, 4:131--134, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. W. Reed and M. Jorgensen. The double pareto-lognormal distribution - a new parametric model for size distribution. Communications in Statistics -Theory and Methods, 33(8):1733--1753, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. R.Gibrat. inégalités économiques. Librarie du Recuil Sirey, 1931.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. G. Szabo and A.-L. Barabasi. Network effects in service usage. ArXiv e-prints physics/0611177, November 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Mobile call graphs: beyond power-law and lognormal distributions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      KDD '08: Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
      August 2008
      1116 pages
      ISBN:9781605581934
      DOI:10.1145/1401890
      • General Chair:
      • Ying Li,
      • Program Chairs:
      • Bing Liu,
      • Sunita Sarawagi

      Copyright © 2008 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 24 August 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      KDD '08 Paper Acceptance Rate118of593submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

      Upcoming Conference

      KDD '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader