skip to main content
10.1145/1401890.1401983acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Local peculiarity factor and its application in outlier detection

Authors Info & Claims
Published:24 August 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Peculiarity oriented mining (POM), aiming to discover peculiarity rules hidden in a dataset, is a new data mining method. In the past few years, many results and applications on POM have been reported. However, there is still a lack of theoretical analysis. In this paper, we prove that the peculiarity factor (PF), one of the most important concepts in POM, can accurately characterize the peculiarity of data with respect to the probability density function of a normal distribution, but is unsuitable for more general distributions. Thus, we propose the concept of local peculiarity factor (LPF). It is proved that the LPF has the same ability as the PF for a normal distribution and is the so-called µ-sensitive peculiarity description for general distributions. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the LPF, we apply it to outlier detection problems and give a new outlier detection algorithm called LPF-Outlier. Experimental results show that LPF-Outlier is an effective outlier detection algorithm.

References

  1. N. Abe, B. Zadrozny, and J. Langford. Outlier detection by active learning. Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 504--509, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. N. L. Bhamidipati and S. K. Pal. Comparing rank-inducing scoring systems. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, pages 300--303, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. L. Breiman. Bagging predictors. Machine Learning, 24:123--140, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M. M. Breunig, H. P. Kriegel, R. T. Ng, and J. Sander. Lof: identifying density-based local outliers. Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pages 93--104, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. N. V. Chawla, K. W. Bowyer, L. O. Hall, and W. P. Kegelmeyer. Smote: Synthetic minority oversampling technique. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 16:321--357, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. L. Ertoz. Similarity Measures. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Minnesota, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. S. Harkins, H. He, G. J. Willams, and R. A. Baster. Outlier detection using replicator neural networks. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery, pages 170--180, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Z. Y. He, X. F. Xu, and S. C. Deng. Discovering cluster based local outliers. Pattern Recognition Letters, 24:164--1650, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Z. Y. He, X. F. Xu, Z. X. Huang, and S. C. Deng. A frequent pattern discovery method for outlier detection. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Web-Age Information Management, pages 726--732, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. E. Knorr and R. Ng. Algorithms for mining distance-based outliers in large datasets. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, pages 392--403, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. Lazarevic and V. Kumar. Feature bagging for outlier detection. Proceedings of the 11th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 157--166, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. B. Liu, W. Hsu, and Y. Ma. Integrating classification and association rule mining. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 80--86, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. K. Mcgarry. A survey of interestingness measures for knowledge discovery. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 20:39--61, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. G. Merz and P. Murphy. Uci repository of machine learning databases. http://www.ics.uci.edu/mlearn/MLRepository.html, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. M. Ohshima, N. Zhong, Y. Y. Yao, and C. Liu. Relational peculiarity oriented mining. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 15:249--273, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. M. Ohshima, N. Zhong, Y. Y. Yao, and S. Murata. Peculiarity oriented analysis in multi-people tracking images. Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 508--518, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. S. Ramaswamy, R. Rastogi, and S. Kyuseok. Efficient algorithms for mining outliers from large data sets. Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pages 427--438, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. D. Saso and L. Nada. An introduction to inductive logic programming. Relational Data Mining, pages 48--73, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Y. Y. Yao, F. Y. Wang, J. Wang, and D. D. Zeng. Rule + exception strategies for security information analysis. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 20:52--57, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Y. Y. Yao and N. Zhong. An analysis of peculiarity oriented data mining. Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshop on the Foundation of Data Mining and Discovery, pages 185--188, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. N. Zhong, C. Liu, Y. Y. Yao, M. Ohshima, M. X. Huang, and J. J. Huang. Relational peculiarity oriented data mining. Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, pages 575--578, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. N. Zhong, M. Ohshima, and S. Ohsuga. Peculiarity oriented mining and its application for knowledge discovery in amino-acid data. Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 260--269, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. N. Zhong, Y. Yao, and M. Ohshima. Peculiarity oriented multi-database mining. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 15:952--960, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. N. Zhong, Y. Y. Yao, M. Ohshima, and S. Ohsuga. Interestingness, peculiarity, and multi-database mining. Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, pages 566--573, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Local peculiarity factor and its application in outlier detection

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        KDD '08: Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
        August 2008
        1116 pages
        ISBN:9781605581934
        DOI:10.1145/1401890
        • General Chair:
        • Ying Li,
        • Program Chairs:
        • Bing Liu,
        • Sunita Sarawagi

        Copyright © 2008 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 24 August 2008

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        KDD '08 Paper Acceptance Rate118of593submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

        Upcoming Conference

        KDD '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader