Jonas Boustedt
ABSTRACT
Traditional interview methods within qualitative research often capture the purely academic perspective on phenomena. To address this problem, an innovative research method, combining role-playing with phenomenography is proposed. The approach suggested in this paper aims to stimulate participants to widen their perspectives by encouraging them to a deeper engagement with a specific activity, thereby enabling them to re ect actively on their actions and on concepts involved in a specific situated context. In the outlined strategy, the role-playing involved realistic work with large-scale software. This was immediately followed by a debriefing using phenomenographic research interviews when the participants still had the experience fresh in mind. The phenomenographic analysis of the interview transcripts confirmed that the method was successful. The subjects frequently expressed their understanding of theoretical concepts in relation to their experiences from working with the software. The more advanced ways to experience the phenomena was often expressed - and sometimes inspired - by the software's way to take advantage of the concepts. The specific use of the described method resulted in empirical insights into how students experience object-oriented concepts in software engineering, such as the Java Interface.
- M. Abrandt Dahlgren. From senior student to novice worker: learning trajectories in political science, psychology and mechanical engineering. Studies in Higher Education, 31(5):569--586, 2006.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- G. S. Åkerlind. Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(4):321--334, 2005.Google Scholar
- S. K. Andrianoff and D. B. Levine. Role playing in an object-oriented world. SIGCSE Bulletin, 34(1):121--125, 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Aubusson, S. Fogwill, R. Barr, and L. Perkovic. What happens when students do simulation-role-play in science? Journal Research in Science Education, 27(4):565--579, 1997.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. J. Aubusson and S. Fogwill. Role play as analogical modelling in science. In P. J. Aubusson, A. G. Harrison, and S. M. Ritchie, editors, Metaphor and Analogy in Science Education, pages 93--104. Springer, Netherlands, 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Ben-Ari. Situated learning in computer science education. Computer Science Education, 14(2):85--100, 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Booth. Learning to program: A phenomenogaphic perspective. Dissertation, Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis 89:1992, 1992.Google Scholar
- S. Booth and Å. Ingerman. Making sense of physics in the first year of study. Learning and Instruction, 12(5):493--507, 2002.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Boustedt. Students working with a Large Software System: Experiences and Understandings. Uppsala University, Sweden, 2007.Google Scholar
- J. Bowden. The nature of phenomenographic research. In J. Bowden and E. Walsh, editors, Phenomenography. RMIT University Press, Melbourne, 2000.Google Scholar
- L. Cohen, L. Manion, and K. Morrison. Research Methods in Education. Routhledge, New York, NY, 6 edition, 2007.Google Scholar
- J. Dalbey. The software engineering apprentice. Computer Science Education, 8(1):16--26, 1998.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications, London, 1994.Google Scholar
- F. DeRemer and H. H. Kron. Programming-in-the large versus programming-in-the-small. In Proceedings of the international conference on Reliable software, pages 114--121, New York, 1975. ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Francis and A. Byrne. The use of role-playing exercises in teaching undergraduate astronomy and science. Publications of the Astrononomical Society of Australia, 46(2):203--211, 1999.Google Scholar
- R. E. Gunderman. A glimpse into a program maintenance. In G. Parikh, editor, Techniques of program and system maintenance. QED Information Sciences, Inc, Wellesley, MA, 1988.Google Scholar
- G. Halleck. Data generation through role-play: assessing oral proficiency. Simulation & Gaming, 38(1):91--106, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. R. Henry and J. LaFrance. Integrating role-play into software engineering courses. Journal of Computing in Small Colleges, 22(2):32--38, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Jaccheri. Software quality and software process improvement course based on interaction with the local software industry. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 9(4):265--272, 2001.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. Jaccheri and S. Morasca. On the importance of dialogue with industry about software engineering education. In Proceedings of the 2006 international workshop on Summit on software engineering education, pages 5--8, Shanghai, China, 2006. ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Kajko-Mattsson, S. Forssander, G. Andersson, and U. Olsson. Developing CM3: Maintainers' education and training at ABB. Computer Science Education, 12(1-2):57--89, 2002.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Kölling and D. J. Barnes. Enhancing apprentice-based learning of java. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 36(1):286--290, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Lave and E. Wenger. Situated Learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991.Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. C. Lethbridge. A survey of the relevance of computer science and software engineering education. In Proceedings of the 11th Conference of Software Education & Training, pages 44--55. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1998. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Y. S. Lincoln and E. G. Guba. Naturalistic inquiry. Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 1985.Google Scholar
- F. Marton. Phenomenography - a research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought, 21(3):28--49, 1986.Google Scholar
- F. Marton. The structure of awareness. In J. Bowden and E. Walsh, editors, Phenomenography. RMIT University Press, Melbourne, 2000.Google Scholar
- F. Marton and S. Booth. Learning and Awareness. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, Mahwah, New Jersey, 1997.Google Scholar
- F. Marton and R. Säljö. On qualitative differences in learning - 1: Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46:4--11, 1976.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. Marton and R. Säljö. On qualitative differences in learning - 2: Outcome as a function of the learner's conception of the task. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46:115--127, 1976.Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. Muhr. User's Manual for ATLAS.ti 5.0. Scientific Software Development, Berlin, 2 edition, 2004.Google Scholar
- D. L. Parnas. Software engineering programmes are not computer science programmes. Annals of Software Engineering, 6(1-4):19--37, 1999. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. T. E. Richardson. The concepts and methods of phenomenographic research. Review of Educational Research, 69(1):53--82, 1999.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. D. Tvedt, R. Tesoriero, and K. A. Gary. The software factory: An undergraduate computer science curriculum. Computer Science Education, 12(1-2):91--117, 2002.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. R. B. Vaughn. Teaching industrial practices in an undergraduate software engineering course. Computer Science Education, 11(1):21--32, 2001.Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. Walsh. Phenomenographic analysis of interview transcripts. In J. Bowden and E. Walsh, editors, Phenomenography. RMIT University Press, Melbourne, 2000.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- A methodology for exploring students' experiences and interaction with large-scale software through role-play and phenomenography
Recommendations
From phenomenography study to planning teaching
ITiCSE '10: Proceedings of the fifteenth annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science educationA phenomenographic study uncovers variations in the way that the subjects are aware of a phenomenon. In the categories of description that represent the variations in awareness there are features that, through their variation, define the characteristics ...
Students’ Experience of Participation in a Discipline—A Longitudinal Study of Computer Science and IT Engineering Students
This article concludes a longitudinal study with the broader aim to explore learner development as a long-term, social process. One goal has been to inform the endeavours of improving student engagement, retention, as well as under-representation of ...
Work in progress: Phenomenographic perspective on engineering students' experience of interdisciplinary learning
FIE '12: Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)With challenges engineering education faces in meeting societal needs, learning in an interdisciplinary setting has the potential to provide engineering students with opportunities to consider alternative perspectives and engage in deep learning ...
Comments