skip to main content
10.1145/1413634.1413691acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdimeaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The rhetoric of interactive art works

Published:10 September 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this contribution, I identify rhetorical figures that are specific to interactive writing: figures of manipulation (meaning gestual manipulation). It's a category on its own, along with figures of diction, construction, meaning and thought. In many computer art works, the artists use the figures of manipulation to introduce a loss of grasp.

What is emphasized in such figures is the coupling action/behavior, which could be considered as a basic unit in interactive writing. This coupling can be conceived independently from the medias it relies on. Thus, an a-media approach seems relevant when attempting to define an art of rhetoric in interactive writing.

References

  1. Bootz, P. 2003 « Adaptive generators and temporal semiotics », http://transitoireobs.free.fr/to/article.php3?id_article=22Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bouchardon, S. (dir.), Broudoux, E., Deseilligny, O., Ghitalla, F. 2007 Un laboratoire de littératures -- Littérature numérique et Internet, Bibliothèque Publique d'Information, Éditions du Centre Georges Pompidou, Paris.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Chateauraynaud, F., Bessy, C. 1995. Experts et faussaires. Pour une sociologie de la perception, Editions Anne-Marie Métailié, Paris.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jeanneret, Y., 2000. Y a-t-il vraiment des technologies7 de l'information?, Editions universitaires du Septentrion.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Manovich, L. 2001. The language of New Media, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Molinié, G. 1992. Dictionnaire de rhétorique, Hachette, Paris.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Moulthrop, S. 1991. « Reading for the Map: Metonymy and Metaphor in the Fiction of "Forking Paths" », in Delany Paul and Landow George (dir.), Hypermedia and Literary Studies, pp. 119--132, MIT Press, Cambridge. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The rhetoric of interactive art works

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DIMEA '08: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Digital Interactive Media in Entertainment and Arts
      September 2008
      551 pages
      ISBN:9781605582481
      DOI:10.1145/1413634

      Copyright © 2008 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 September 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      DIMEA '08 Paper Acceptance Rate59of77submissions,77%Overall Acceptance Rate59of77submissions,77%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader