skip to main content
10.1145/1414558.1414564acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiteConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Assessing it service-learning

Published:16 October 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Service-Learning is the delivery of a service to the community within the context of an educational program of study. Going further, it is a form of experiential learning, applying what was learned within a classroom or laboratory setting to problems of the real world. Using service-learning, students in information technology can experience the unstructured problems of a real world situation while having the structure of a university course. While one major goal of service-learning is service, the delivery of some benefit to the community partner, the other major goal is for the students to achieve the learning that is part of the department's education objectives. It is therefore a pedagogy which should be investigated for efficacy as any other pedagogy would be. This paper investigates how information technology based service-learning could be measured for both service and learning. For service, a longer term follow-up with the non-profit partners is presented. The purpose is to ascertain if the service learning project really did help the non-profit partners provide their services better, or, conversely, if the service-learning project was really a "feel good" project for the student and a "promotion" project for the community partner. For the learning portion of service-learning, a review of assessment methods is presented. These methods look at two areas, the application of Information Technology domain specific hard skills and also the application of other skills such as teamwork, communication, and project management. The use of a project postmortem is proposed as a reflective exercise to measure how the student participants have been changed in the process.

References

  1. ABET Computing Accreditation Commission. 2007, November 3. Criteria for accrediting computing programs. Retrieved June 21, 2008, from http://www.abet.org/forms.shtmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrington, L., & Duffy, L. 2007. Attracting underrepresented groups to engineering with service-learning. Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annual Conference. Retrieved July 7, 2008 from http://www.asee.org/acPapers/AC%202007Full2871.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bringle, R., Phillips, M., & Hudson, M. 2004. The measure of service learning: Research scales to assess student experiences. American Psychological Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Collier, B., DeMarco, T., & Fearey, P. 1996. A defined process for project postmortem review. IEEE Software. July, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Dark, M. 2004. Assessing student performance outcomes in an information security risk assessment, service learning course. Proceedings of the SIGITE '04 Conference (Salt Lake City, UT, October 28-30, 2004). Retrieved 6/19/2008 from http://portal.acm.org Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Fulbright, R, & Routh, R. 2005. IPC Incorporated: A student-run IT services company for experiential learning. Proceedings of the SIGITE '05 Conference (Newark, NJ, October 20-22, 2005). Retrieved 6/19/2008 from http://portal.acm.org Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Furco, A. 1996. Service-learning: A balanced approach to experiential education. In Corporation for National Service (Ed.), Expanding Boundaries: Serving and Learning. Cooperative Education Association, Columbia, MD, 2--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Hazim, S. 2004. Improving students retention by engaging them in real life. Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference. Retrieved July 7, 2008 from http://www.asee.org/acPapers/2004-2413_Final.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. National Service-Learning Clearinghouse. What is service learning? Retrieved May 16, 2008 from http://www.servicelearning.org/what_is_service-learning/index.phpGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Phillips, L, Brady, A., & Jousma, K. 2007. Interdisciplinary international senior design: How service learning projects in developing countries support ABET accreditation. Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annual Conference. Retrieved July 7, 2008 from http://www.asee.org/acPapers/AC%202007Full1638.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Pressman, R. 2005. Software engineering: A practitioner's approach (Chapter 21). McGraw Hill, New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Reel, J. 1999. Critical success factors in software projects. IEEE Software. May/June 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Assessing it service-learning

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGITE '08: Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGITE conference on Information technology education
        October 2008
        280 pages
        ISBN:9781605583297
        DOI:10.1145/1414558

        Copyright © 2008 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 16 October 2008

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate176of429submissions,41%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader