skip to main content
10.1145/1452392.1452399acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Interaction techniques for the analysis of complex data on high-resolution displays

Published:20 October 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

When combined with the organizational space provided by a simple table, physical notecards are a powerful organizational tool for information analysis. The physical presence of these cards affords many benefits but also is a source of disadvantages. For example, complex relationships among them are hard to represent. There have been a number of notecard software systems developed to address these problems. Unfortunately, the amount of visual details in such systems is lacking compared to real notecards on a large physical table; we look to alleviate this problem by providing a digital solution. One challenge with new display technology and systems is providing an efficient interface for its users. In this paper we look at comparing different interaction techniques of an emerging class of organizational systems that use high-resolution tabletop displays. The focus of these systems is to more easily and efficiently assist interaction with information. Using PDA, token, gesture, and voice interaction techniques, we conducted a within subjects experiment comparing these techniques over a large high-resolution horizontal display. We found strengths and weaknesses for each technique. In addition, we noticed that some techniques build upon and complement others.

References

  1. Mori. http://apokalypsesoftware.com/products/mori, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. C. Andrews, T. Henry, C. Miller, and F. Quek. Cardtable: An embodied tool for analysis of historical information. 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. R. Ball and C. North. Visual analytics: Realizing embodied interaction for visual analytics through large displays. Comput. Graph., 31(3):380--400, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. R. G. Ball. E ects of large, high-resolution displays for geospatial information visualization. PhD thesis, Virginia Tech, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. R. A. Bolt. put-that-there": Voice and gesture at the graphics interface. SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph., 14(3):262--270, 1980. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. B. L. Chalfonte, R. S. Fish, and R. E. Kraut. Expressive richness: a comparison of speech and text as media for revision. In CHI '91, pp. 21--26, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. N. T. Dang, M. Tavanti, I. Rankin, and M. Cooper. A comparison of di fferent input devices for a 3d environment. In Proc. 14th European conf. on Cog. ergonomics, pp. 153--160, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. P. Dietz and D. Leigh. Diamondtouch: a multi-user touch technology. In UIST '01, pp. 219--226, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. A. Esenther and K. Ryall. Fluid dtmouse: better mouse support for touch-based interactions. In Proc. Working Conf. on Advanced Visual Interfaces, pp. 112--115, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. EverNote. http://www.evernote.com/, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. C. Forlines, D. Wigdor, C. Shen, and R. Balakrishnan. Direct-touch vs. mouse input for tabletop displays. In CHI '07, pp. 647--656,2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. A. Grasso, D. S. Ebert, and T. W. Finin. The integrality of speech in multimodal interfaces. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 5(4):303--325, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. F. Guimbretiffere, M. Stone, and T. Winograd. Fluid interaction with high-resolution wall-size displays. In UIST '01, pp. 21--30, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. F. G. Halasz, T. P. Moran, and R. H. Trigg. Notecards in a nutshell. In CHI '87, pp. 45--52, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. H. Ishii and B. Ullmer. Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. In CHI '97, pp. 234--241, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. S. R. Klemmer, J. Graham, G. J. Wol , and J. A. Landay. Books with voices: paper transcripts as a physical interface to oral histories. In CHI '03, pp. 89--96, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. C. Magerkurth, M. Memisoglu, T. Engelke, and N. Streitz. Towards the next generation of tabletop gaming experiences. In Proc. Conf. on Graphics Interface, pp. 73--80, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. C. C. Marshall, F. G. Halasz, R. A. Rogers, and J. William C. Janssen. Aquanet: a hypertext tool to hold your knowledge in place. In HYPERTEXT '91, pp. 261--275, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. S. Meyer, O. Cohen, and E. Nilsen. Device comparisons for goal-directed drawing tasks. In CHI '94, pp. 251--252, New York, NY, USA, 1994. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. C. Neuwirth, D. Kaufer, R. Chimera, and T. Gillespie. The notes program: a hypertext application for writing from source texts. In HYPERTEXT '87: Proceeding of the ACM conference on Hypertext, pp. 121--141, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. S. Oviatt. Taming recognition errors with a multimodal interface. Commun. ACM, 43(9):45--51, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. J. Patten, H. Ishii, J. Hines, and G. Pangaro. Sensetable: a wireless object tracking platform for tangible user interfaces. In CHI '01, pp. 253--260, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. A. M. Piper, E. O'Brien, M. R. Morris, and T. Winograd. Sides: a cooperative tabletop computer game for social skills development. In CSCW '06, pp. 1--10, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. J. Rekimoto, B. Ullmer, and H. Oba. Datatiles: a modular platform for mixed physical and graphical interactions. In CHI '01, pp. 269--276, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. A. J. Sabri, R. G. Ball, A. Fabian, S. Bhatia, and C. North. High--resolution gaming: Interfaces, notifications, and the user experience. Interact. Comput., 19(2):151--166, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. T. W. Schneider and O. Balci. Vtquest: a voice-based multimodal web-based software system for maps and directions. In Proc. 44th annual Southeast Regional Conf., pp. 300--305, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. S. D. Scott, M. Sheelagh, T. Carpendale, and K. M. Inkpen. Territoriality in collaborative tabletop workspaces. In CSCW '04, pp. 294--303, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. C. Shen. Ubitable: Impromptu face-to-face collaboration on horizontal interactive surfaces, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. C. Shen, F. D. Vernier, C. Forlines, and M. Ringel. Diamondspin: an extensible toolkit for around-the-table interaction. In CHI '04, pp. 167--174, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. J. P. Springer, C. Sladeczek, M. Scheffer, J. Hochstrate, B. Frohlich, and F. Melchior. A survey of large high-resolution display technologies, techniques, and applications. In VR '06, p. 31, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. N. A. Streitz, J. Gei'ler, T. Holmer, S. Konomi, C. Muller-Tomfelde, W. Reischl, P. Rexroth, P. Seitz, and R. Steinmetz. i-land: an interactive landscape for creativity and innovation. In CHI '99, pp. 120--127, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. SuperNoteCard. http://www.mindola.com/snc/index.html, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. B. Ullmer and H. Ishii. The metadesk: models and prototypes for tangible user interfaces. In UIST '97, pp. 223--232, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. B. Ullmer, H. Ishii, and R. J. K. Jacob. Token+constraint systems for tangible interaction with digital information. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 12(1):81--118, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. M. Wu and R. Balakrishnan. Multi-nger and whole hand gestural interaction techniques for multi-user tabletop displays. In UIST '03, pp. 193--202, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Interaction techniques for the analysis of complex data on high-resolution displays

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader