skip to main content
10.1145/1453805.1453826acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuxtvConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Google TV search: dual-wielding search and discovery in a large-scale product

Published: 22 October 2008 Publication History

Abstract

In 2006 Google designed and implemented a TV Show search system which featured a dual-navigation control combining a powerful search system with an interactive, personalize-able TV listings grid. The dual-control system allowed users to move fluidly between explicit search and general discovery, obtain detailed information without leaving the global context and construct a personal channel for easy access and recommendations. As a complete system, TV Search integrated with Google's general search page through a mini-listings onebox and also exported information out to Google calendar, Gmail and TiVo. Building this TV Search system as a large-scale product meant addressing many technological, business and fine-grained user experience details. This paper describes the design process including the early designs, the user studies and the details of the final system including the mini-guide, main page dual-control and the integrated services on the detail pages.

References

[1]
ComScore AIM Qualitative Report, Winter Release 2005.
[2]
Catledge, L., and Pitkow, J. 1995. Characterizing Browsing Strategies in the World-Wide Web. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 27, 6 (April 1995), 1065--1073.
[3]
Schneiderman, B. 2002. Understanding Human Activities and Relationships. Interactions (Sep-Oct 2002), 40--53.
[4]
Chorianopoulos, K. 2003. The Digital Set-Top Box as a Virtual Channel Provider. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2003, Florida, 2003), 666--667.
[5]
Borella, M.S., Sears, A., and Jacko, J.A. 1995. The Effects of Internet Latency on User Perception of Information Content. Proceedings of IEEE Global Telecommunications Conferences, (Nov. 1997), 1932--1936.
[6]
Lull, J. 1990. Families' Social Uses of Television as Extensions of the Household. Television and the American Family. Lawrence Erlbaum.
[7]
Lee, B. and Lee, R. 1995. How and Why People Watch TV: Implications for the Future of Interactive Television. J. of Advertising Research. (Nov-Dec 1995), 9--18.
[8]
Castleman, H. and Podrazik, W. 2003. Watching TV: Six Decades of American Television. Syracuse University Press.
[9]
Ehrmantraunt, H., and Wittig, S. 1996. The Personal Electronic Program Guide -- Towards the Pre-selection of Individual TV programs. Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Information and knowledge management, (1996), 243--250.
[10]
Smyth B., and Cotter P. 2004. Case-Studies on the Evolution of the Personalized Electronic Program Guide. In Personalized Digital Television, L. Ardissono et al (eds.). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 53--71.
[11]
Obrien et al. 1999. At Home with the Technology: An Ethnographic Study of a Set-Top-Box Trial. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 6, 3 (Sept. 1999), 282--308.
[12]
Westernik, J et al. 2002. Human factors in the design of a personalizable EPG: preference-indication strategies, habit watching and trust. 21, 4 (2002), 249--258.
[13]
Eronon, L., and Vuorimma, P. 2000. User Interfaces for Digital Televisions: a Navigator Case Study. In Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces. (2002), 276--279.
[14]
Tinker, P., Fox, J., and Daily, M. 2003. A zooming, electronic programming interface. 3rd Workshop on Personalization in Future TV (TV'03), 7--11.
[15]
Ardissono, L., and Maybury M (eds.). 2003. Proceedings of the UM 2003 Workshop on Personalization, TV'03: Personalization in Future TV.
[16]
Smyth, B., and Cotter, P. 1999. Surfing the Digital Wave: Generating Personalized (TV) Listings Using Collaborative, Case-Based Recommendation. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Case-based Reasoning. Munich, Germany, (1999), 561--572.
[17]
Resnick, P. et al. 1994. GroupLens: an open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews. In Proceedings of the 1994 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, October 22-26, 1994). CSCW '94. ACM, New York, NY, 175--186.
[18]
Kamal A. and Wijnand van S. 2004 TiVo: making show recommendations using a distributed collaborative filtering architecture. (KDD 2004), 394--401.
[19]
Bywater, J., et al. 2004. Scalable and Personalised Broadcast Service. (EuroITV'04).
[20]
Rowson, J., et al. 2005. Phiz: Discovering TVs Long Tail through a Channel-Centric Model. 3rd European Conference on Interactive Television (EuroITV 2005, Aalborg University, Denmark, 30 March 2005).
[21]
http://oracleofbacon.org/
[22]
Chang, F., et al. Bigtable: A Distributed Stoarage System for Structured Data. 7th Symposium on Operating System Design and Implementation. (OSDI'06, Washington, Nov. 2006).

Cited By

View all
  • (2012)Discrimination of media moments and media intervalsMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-011-0846-661:3(675-696)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2012
  • (2010)Taking advantage of contextualized interactions while users watch TVMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-010-0481-750:3(587-607)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2010

Index Terms

  1. Google TV search: dual-wielding search and discovery in a large-scale product

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    UXTV '08: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Designing interactive user experiences for TV and video
    October 2008
    210 pages
    ISBN:9781605581002
    DOI:10.1145/1453805
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 22 October 2008

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. EPG
    2. IPTV
    3. TV
    4. TV guide
    5. TV listings
    6. discovery
    7. electronic program guide
    8. interactive TV
    9. product case study
    10. search
    11. television
    12. user experience
    13. user interface

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    uxTV '08
    Sponsor:

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2012)Discrimination of media moments and media intervalsMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-011-0846-661:3(675-696)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2012
    • (2010)Taking advantage of contextualized interactions while users watch TVMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-010-0481-750:3(587-607)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2010

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media