skip to main content
10.1145/1456536.1456563acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Gender and information processing in electronic age

Published:22 September 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

The effect of gender in academic achievement has often been the focus of research because of its potential implications. However, the Web has modified the way people access and use information. The present study examines the differences between males' and females' reading behaviour in hypertexts. The study focuses on text based electronic documents. Ninety participants (27 females and 63 males) read a hierarchically structured hypertext and answered a set of questions. The study examines some original variables not previously studied comprehensively, such as coherence of transactions, sum of selected hyperlinks, hyperlink location etc. The results show that gender did not significantly affect any of the measured variables. The data consisted of reading times, comprehension scores, coherent links, hyperlink location, sum of hyperlinks, and the sum of read nodes.

References

  1. Hupfer, E. M. and B. Detlor, "Gender and Web Information Seeking: A Self-Concepted Orientation Model", Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57 (8): p. 1105--1115, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Torgrimson, B. N. and C. T. Minson, "Sex and gender: what is the difference?" Journal of Applied Physiology, 99: p. 785--787, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bimber, B., "The Gender Gap on the Internet", Social Science Quarterly, 81: p. 868--876, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Denis, A. and M. Ollivier, "How Wired are Canadian Women? The Intersection of Gender, Class and Language with the Use of New Information Technologies": p., 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ono, H. and M. Zavodny, "Gender and the Internet", Social Science Quarterly, 84: p., 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Boneva, B., R. Kraut, and D. Frohlich, "Using E-Mail for Personal Relationships: The Difference Gender Makes", American Behavioral Scientist, 45: p. 530--549, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Kennedy, T., B. Wellman, and K. Klement, "Gendering the Digital Divine", IT and Society, 1: p. 149--172, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Hargittai, E. and S. Shafer, "Differences in Actual and Perceived Online Skills The Role of Gender", Social Science Quarterly, 87 (2): p. 432--448, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Dee, T., "The Why Chromosome", Education Next, 4: p. 69--75, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hyde, J. S. and M. C. Linn, "Gender Differences in Verbal Ability: A Meta-Analysis", Psychological Bulletin, 104: p. 53--69, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Hyde, J. S., E. Fennema, and J. S. Lamon, "Gender Differences in Mathematics Performance: A Meta-Analysis", Psychological Bulletin, 107: p. 139--155, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Glazer, S., "Gender and Learning", CQ Researcher, 15 (19): p. 445--4468, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Halpern, D. F., "A Cognitive Process Taxonomy for sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities", Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13 (4): p. 134--139, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Dar-Nimrod, I. and J. S. Heine, "Exposure to Scientific Theories Affects Women's Math Performance", Science, 314 (5798): p. 435, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Cadinu, M., et al., "Why Do Women Underperform Under Stereotype Threat?" Psychological Science, 16 (7): p. 572--578, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Protopsaltis, A. and V. Bouki, "Does Gender Matter in Hypertext Reading?" in ED-MEDIA 2008 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, Vienna, Austria: AACE, In press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Astleitner, H. and R. Steinberg, "Are there gender differences in web-based learning? An integrated model and related effect sizes", AACE Journal, 13 (1): p. 47--63, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Anderson, R., E, "Females Surpass Male in Computer Problem Solving: Findings from the Minnesota Computer Literacy Assessment", Journal Educational Computing Research, 3: p. 39--51, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Protopsaltis, A. and V. Bouki, "Gender Patterns in Hypertext Reading" in Workshop on cognition and the Web, Granada, Spain, 2008, 213--217.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Riding, R. and M. Grimley, "Cognitive style, gender and learning from multi-media materials in 11-year-old children ", British Journal of Educational Technology, 30 (1): p. 43--56, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Riding, R. J., "Cognitive style: A review", in International Perpectives on Individual Differences, R. R. J. and R. S. G., Editors, Ablex: Stanford CT. p. 315--344, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Linn, M. C. and A. C. Paterson, "A Meta-Analysis of gender differences in Spatial Ability: Implications for Mathematics and Science Achievement", in The Psychology of Gender: Advances Through Meta-Analysis, J. S. Hyde and M. C. Linn, Editors, John Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Halpern, D. F., "Sex differences and cognitive abilities", Mahwah: NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Weiman, H., "Gender differences in cognitive functioning." 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Whitley, B. E. J., "Gender differences in computer related attitudes and behavior: A meta-analysis", Computers in Human Behavior, 13: p. 1--22, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Koc, M., "Individual Learner Differences In Web-based Learning Environments: From Cognitive, Affective and Social-cultural Perspectives", in Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Barrett, E. and V. Lally, "Gender differences in an online learning environment", Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 15: p. 48--60, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Gunn, C. and M. McSporran, "Dominant or different? Gender issues in computer supported learning", Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7 (1): p. 14--39, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Lal, V., "Gender and the impact of computer-based technologies", 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Mehlenbacher, B., et al., "Active and interactive learning online: A comparison of Web-based and conventional writing classes", IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 43 (2): p. 166--184, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. McSporran, M. and S. Young, "Does gender matter in online learning?" Association of Learning Technology Journal, 9 (2): p. 3--15, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. McSporran, M., S. Young, and R. Dewstow, "Who Wants to Learn Online? Identifying Our Flexible Learners" in Proceedings of the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications Conference, Seattle, Washington, USA: AACE, 1999, 1553.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Roy, M., R. Taylor, and T. H. Chi, Michelene "Searching for Information On-line and Off-line: Gender Differences Among Middle School Students", Journal of Educational Computing Research, 9 (2): p. 229--252, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. RAND, R. S. G., "Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension", RAND Reading Study Group: Santa Monica, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Protopsaltis, A., "Reading Strategies in Hypertexts and Factors Influencing Hyperlink Selection", Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 172 (2): p. 190--213, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Protopsaltis, A. and V. Bouki, "The Effects of Reading Goals in Hypertexts Reading" in ACM SIGDOC 24th International Conference on Design of Communication, South Carolina, USA, 2006, 29--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Protopsaltis, A. and V. Bouki, "Reading Strategies in Hypertexts and Factors Influencing Link Selection" in EDMEDIA 2006 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, Orlando, Florida: AACE, 2006, 450--457.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Protopsaltis, A. and V. Bouki, "Towards a Hypertext reading/Comprehension Model" in ACM SIGDOC 23rd International Conference on Design of Communication, Coventry, UK: ACM Press, 2005, 159--166. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Kadijevich, D., "Gender differences in computer attitude among ninth-grade students", Journal of Educational Computing Research, 22 (2): p. 145--154, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Todman, J., & Dick, G., "Primary children and teachers' attitudes to computers", Computers in Education, 20 (2): p. 199--203, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Schumacher, P. and J. Morahan-Martin, "Gender, Internet and computer attitudes and experiences." Computers in Human Behavior, 17 (1): p. 95--110, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Light, P., et al., "Gender and social comparison effects in computer-based problem solving", Learning and Instruction, 10: p. 483--496, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Large, A., J. Beheshti, and T. Rahman, "Gender differences in collaborative Web searching behavior: an elementary school study", Information Processing and Management, 38 (3): p. 427--443, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Mitra, A., et al., "Gender and Computer Use in an Academic Institution: Report from a Longitudinal Study", Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23 (1): p. 67--84, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Nachmais, R., D. Mioduser, and A. Shemla, "Information and communication technologies usage by students in an Israeli high school: Equity, gender, and inside/outside school learning issues", Education and Information Technologies, 6 (1): p. 43--53, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Leong, S. C. and S. Hawamdeh, "Gender and Learning attitudes in using Web-based Science Lessons", in Information Research, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Roy, M. and M. T. H. Chi, "Gender differences in patterns of searching the web", Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29 (3): p. 335--348, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Salmerón, L., W. Kintsch, and J. Cañas, J., "Reading Strategies and Prior Knowledge in Learning from Hypertext", Memory and Cognition, 34 (5): p. 1157--1171, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Kintsch, W. and T. A. van Dijk, "Towards a model of text comprehension and production", Psychological Review, 85: p. 363--394, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Thelwall, M., F. Barjak, and H. Kretschmer, "Web links and gender in science: An exploratory analysis", Scientometrics, 67 (3): p. 373--383, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Ainley, M., S. Hidi, and D. Berndorff, "Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship", Journal of Educational Psychology, 86: p. 303--311, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. McDonald, S. and L. Spencer, "Gender Differences in web Navigation", in Computerization: Charting a Course to the Future, E. Balka and K. R. Smith, Editors, Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston. p. 174--181, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Klöckner, K., N. Wirschum, and A. Jameson, "Depth- and breadth-first processing of search result lists", in CHI '04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, ACM: Vienna, Austria, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Charney, D., "Comprehending non-linear text: The role of discourse cues and reading strategies." in Proceedings of Hypertext '87: Chapel Hill: ACM., 1987, 109--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Gender and information processing in electronic age

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGDOC '08: Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM international conference on Design of communication
        September 2008
        303 pages
        ISBN:9781605580838
        DOI:10.1145/1456536

        Copyright © 2008 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 22 September 2008

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate355of582submissions,61%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader