skip to main content
10.1145/1460096.1460170acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Assessing concept selection for video retrieval

Published:30 October 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

We explore the use of benchmarks to address the problem of assessing concept selection in video retrieval systems. Two benchmarks are presented, one created by human association of queries to concepts, the other generated from an extensively tagged collection. They are compared in terms of reliability, captured semantics, and retrieval performance. Recommendations are given for using the benchmarks to assess concept selection algorithms; the assessment is demonstrated on two existing algorithms. The benchmarks are released to the research community.

References

  1. M. G. Christel and A. G. Hauptmann. The use and utility of high-level semantic features in video retrieval. In CIVR '05, pages 134--144, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. T. M. Cover and J. A. Thomas. Elements of Information Theory. Wiley-Interscience, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. A. G. Hauptmann, R. Yan, W.-H. Lin, M. Christel, and H. D. Wactlar. Can high-level concepts fill the semantic gap in video retrieval? a case study with broadcast news. IEEE Trans. Multimedia, 9(5):958--966, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. B. L. Joseph L. Fleiss and M. C. Paik. The measurement of interrater agreement. In Statistical methods for rates and proportions, pages 598--626. John Wiley & Sons, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. G. Lakoff. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. University Of Chicago Press, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. W.-H. Lin and A. G. Hauptmann. Which thousand words are worth a picture? Experiments on video retrieval using a thousand concepts. In ICME, pages 41--44. IEEE, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. G. A. Miller. Wordnet: A lexical database for english. Comm. ACM, 38:39--41, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. Naphade, J. Smith, J. Tesic, S.-F. Chang, W. Hsu, L. Kennedy, A. Hauptmann, and J. Curtis. Large-scale concept ontology for multimedia. IEEE Multimedia, 13(3):86--91, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. A. P. Natsev, A. Haubold, J. Tešić, L. Xie, and R. Yan. Semantic concept-based query expansion and re-ranking for multimedia retrieval. In ACM Multimedia '07, pages 991--1000, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. S.-Y. Neo, J. Zhao, M.-Y. Kan, and T.-S. Chua. Video retrieval using high level features: Exploiting query matching and confidence-based weighting. In CIVR '06, pages 143--152, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. P. Over, T. Ianeva, W. Kraaij, and A. Smeaton. TRECVID 2005 - an overview. In TRECVid. NIST, USA, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. P. Resnik. Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy. In IJCAI, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. S. E. Robertson, S. Walker, M. Hancock-Beaulieu, A. Gull, and M. Lau. Okapi at TREC. In TREC, pages 21--30, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. G. Salton, A. Wong, and C. S. Yang. A vector space model for automatic indexing. Comm. ACM, 18(11):613--620, 1975. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. A. Schutz and T. Luckmann. The structures of the life-world. Heinemann, London, 1974.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. A. F. Smeaton. Techniques used and open challenges to the analysis, indexing and retrieval of digital video. Inf. Syst., 32(4):545--559, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. A. F. Smeaton, P. Over, and W. Kraaij. Evaluation campaigns and TRECVid. In MIR'06, pages 321--330. ACM Press, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. C. G. Snoek, M. Worring, J. C. van Gemert, J.-M. Geusebroek, and A. W. Smeulders. The challenge problem for automated detection of 101 semantic concepts in multimedia. In ACM Multimedia'06, pages 421--430. ACM, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. C. G. M. Snoek, B. Huurnink, L. Hollink, M. de Rijke, G. Schreiber, and M. Worring. Adding semantics to detectors for video retrieval. IEEE Trans. Multimedia, 9(5): 975--986, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. J. Tešić, A. P. Natsev, and J. R. Smith. Cluster-based data modeling for semantic video search. In CIVR '07, pages 595--602. ACM, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. M. F. Triola. Essentials of Statistics. Addison-Wesley, Boston, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. T. Volkmer, J. R. Smith, and A. P. Natsev. A web-based system for collaborative annotation of large image and video collections: an evaluation and user study. In ACM Multimedia '05, pages 892--901. ACM, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. D. Wang, X. Li, J. Li, and B. Zhang. The importance of query-concept-mapping for automatic video retrieval. In ACM Multimedia '07, pages 285--288. ACM, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. X.-Y. Wei and C.-W. Ngo. Ontology-enriched semantic space for video search. In ACM Multimedia '07, pages 981--990. ACM, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. M. Worring and G. Schreiber. Semantic image and video indexing in broad domains. IEEE Trans. Multimedia, 9(5), 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. R. Yan and A. G. Hauptmann. A review of text and image retrieval approaches for broadcast news video. Inf. Retr., 10 (4-5):445--484, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Assessing concept selection for video retrieval

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          MIR '08: Proceedings of the 1st ACM international conference on Multimedia information retrieval
          October 2008
          506 pages
          ISBN:9781605583129
          DOI:10.1145/1460096

          Copyright © 2008 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 30 October 2008

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Upcoming Conference

          MM '24
          MM '24: The 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia
          October 28 - November 1, 2024
          Melbourne , VIC , Australia

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader