skip to main content
10.1145/1460563.1460597acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Transactive memory in trauma resuscitation

Published:08 November 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes an ethnographic study conducted to explore the possibilities for future design and development of technological support for trauma teams. We videotaped 10 trauma resuscitations and transcribed each event. Using a framework that we developed, we coded each transcript to allow qualitative and quantitative analysis of the trauma teams' collaborative processes. We analyzed teams' tasks, interactions, and communication patterns that support information acquisition and sharing. Our results showed the importance of team transactive memory, but also pointed to inefficiencies in communication processes, which enable the functioning of this collective memory system. Based on quantitative and qualitative observations of trauma teamwork, we present opportunities for technological solutions that may reduce the cognitive effort needed for maintaining the working memory of trauma teams.

References

  1. American College of Surgeons. Advanced Trauma Life Support® (ATLS®), 7th Edition, Chicago, IL, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bardram, J. E. Temporal coordination: On time and coordination of collaborative activities at a surgical department. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 9, 2, (2000), 157--187. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bergs, E. A. G., Rutten, F. L. P. A., Tadros, T., Krijnen, P., and Schipper, I.B. Communication during trauma resuscitation: Do we know what is happening? Injury 36, 8 (2005), 905--911.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Clarke, J. R., Hayward, C. Z., Santora, T. A., Wagner, D. K., and Webber, B. L. Computer-generated trauma management plans: Comparisons with actual care. World Journal of Surgery 26, 5 (2002), 536--538.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Entin, E. E., and Serfaty, D. Adaptive team coordination. Human Factors 41, 2 (1999), 312--325.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Faraj, S., and Xiao, Y. Coordination in fast-response organizations. Management Sci. 52, 8 (2006), 1155--69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Garg, A. X., Adhikari, N. K. J., McDonald, H., Rosas-Arellano, M. P., Devereaux, P. J., et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: A systematic review. JAMA 293, 10, (2005), 1223--1238.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Gertner, A. S., and Webber, B. L. TraumaTIQ: Online decision support for trauma management. IEEE Intelligent Systems 13, 1 (1998), 32--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Gruen, R. L., Jurkovich, G. J., McIntyre, L. K., Foy, H. M., and Maier, R. V. Patterns of errors contributing to trauma mortality: Lessons learned from 2594 deaths. Annals of Surgery 244, 3 (2006), 371--380.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Heath, C., Knoblauch, H., and Luff, P. Technology and social interaction: the emergence of 'workplace studies.' British Journal of Sociology 51, 2, (2000), 299--320.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Heath, C., and Luff, P. Collaboration and control: Crisis management and multimedia technology in London underground line control rooms. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 11, 1-2 (1992), 69--95.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Hindmarsh, J., and Pilnick, A. The tacit order to teamwork: Collaboration and embodied conduct in anesthesia. Sociological Quart. 43, 2, (2002), 139--164.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Hollan, J. Hutchins, E. Kirsh, D. Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM ToCHI 7, 2 (2000), 174--196. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Jordan, B., and Henderson, A. Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of Learning Sciences 4, 1 (1995), 39--103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Klein, K., Ziegert, J., Knight, A., and Xiao, Y. Dynamic delegation: Shared, hierarchical, deindividualized leadership in extreme action teams. Administrative Science Quarterly 51, 4 (2006), 590--621.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Moreira, T. Coordination and embodiment in the operating room. Body & Soc. 10, 1 (2004), 109--129.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Moreland, R. L. Transactive memory and job performance: Helping workers learn who knows what. In J. Levine, L. Thompson, and D. Messick (Eds.), Shared Cognition in Organizations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc. (1996), 3--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Moreland, R. L., and Argote, L. Transactive memory in dynamic organizations. In R. S. Peterson & E. A. Mannix, Leading and Managing People in the Dynamic Organization. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (2003), 135--162.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Reddy, M. C., and Dourish, P. A finger on the pulse: Temporal rhythms and information seeking in medical work. Proc. CSCW '02, (2002), 344--353. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Reddy, M. C., and Spence, P. R. Collaborative information seeking: A field study of a multidisciplinary patient care team. Info. Proc. & Mgmt 44, 1(2008), 242--55. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Stewart, R. M., Myers, J. G., Dent, D. L., Ermis, P., Gray, G. A., et al. Seven hundred fifty-three consecutive deaths in a level I trauma center: The argument for injury prevention. J. Trauma 54, 1 (2003), 66--71.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Svensson, M. S., Heath, C., and Luff, P. Instrumental action: The timely exchange of implements during surgical operations. Proc. ECSCW '07, (2007), 41--60.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Vicente, K. J. Cognitive Work Analysis: Toward Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-Based Work. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (1999). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Wegner, D. M. Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of Group Behavior, New York: Springer-Verlag (1987), 185--208.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Xiao, Y., Moss, J. A., Mackenzie, C. F., Seagull, F. J., and Faraj, S. Transactive responsibility systems and high reliability teams: A tentative formulation. Proc. Human Factors & Ergonomics Soc. Conf. 46, (2002), 1428--32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Transactive memory in trauma resuscitation

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            CSCW '08: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
            November 2008
            752 pages
            ISBN:9781605580074
            DOI:10.1145/1460563

            Copyright © 2008 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 8 November 2008

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

            Upcoming Conference

            CSCW '24

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader