E. Ilana Diamant
Susan R. Fussell
ABSTRACT
Computer-mediated collaboration is becoming an increasingly prevalent form of work ([22]). At the same time, organizations are relying more and more on culturally diverse teams to staff knowledge-intensive projects (e.g., software development, customer service, corporate training,). We conducted a laboratory study examining the role of collaborative technologies and culture on 2-person team members' attributions of causes for their collaborative performance. Pairs of American, Chinese, and intercultural American-Chinese students collaborated on two map navigation tasks using one of three technologies: video, audio, or IM. As predicted, culture and technology interacted to affect the extent to which members attributed performance to dispositional factors (e.g., personality or mood) vs. situational factors (e.g., the technology or task difficulty). We discuss the implications of our results for
cross-cultural collaborative work
- Choi, I., Nisbett, R. E., & Norenzayan, A. (1999). Causal attribution across cultures: Variation and universality. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 47--63.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Clark, H. H. & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, R. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.). Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127--149). Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
- Clark, H. H., & Krych, M. A. (2004). Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding. Journal of Memory & Language, 50(1), 62--81.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1--39Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cramton, C. D. (2001). The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization Science Special Issue, 12(3), 346--371 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cramton, C. D. & Hinds, P. J. (2005). Subgroup dynamics in internationally distributed teams: Ethnocentrism or cross-national learning? Research in Organizational Behavior, 26: 231--263Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cramton, C. D., Orvis, K., & Wilson, J. (2007) Situation Invisibility and Attribution in Distributed Collaborations. Journal of Management, 33: No. 4, 525--546Google Scholar
- Doherty-Sneddon, G., Anderson, A. H., O'Malley, C., Langton, S., Garrod, S. & Bruce, V. (1997). Face-to-face and video mediated communication: a comparison of dialogue structure and task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3, 105--125.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dweck, C. (1999). Self theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Gilbert, D. T. & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 21--38.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hall, E. (1976/1981). Beyond culture. NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
- Hancock, J. T., & Dunham, P. J. (2001). Impression formation in computer-mediated communication revisited: An analysis of the breadth and intensity of impressions. Communication Research, 28, 325--347.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of a multi-dimensional workload rating scale: Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Ed.), Human mental workload (pp. 139--183). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Hewstone, M., Gale, L., & Purkhardt, N. (1990). Intergroup attributions for success and failure: Group-serving bias and group-serving causal schemata. European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology, 10, 23--44.Google Scholar
- Hinds, P. (1999). The cognitive and interpersonal costs of video. Media Psychology. 1 (33), 283--312.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hinds, P. & Kiesler, S. (Eds.) (2002). Distributed work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hofstede, G. J. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Kayan, S., Fussell, S. R., & Setlock, L. D. (2006). Cultural differences in the use of instant messaging in Asia and North America. Proc. CSCW 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kiesler, S., Zubrow, D., Moses, A. & Geller, V.(1985). Affect in computer-mediated communication: an experiment in synchronous terminal-to-terminal discussion. Human-Computer Interaction, 1, 77--104. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kraut, R. E., Fussell, S. R., & Siegel, J. (2003). Visual information as a conversational resource in collaborative physical tasks. Human-Computer Interaction, 18, 13--49. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Leshed, G., Hancock, J. T., Cosley, D., McLeod, P. L., Gay, G. (2007). Feedback for guiding reflection on teamwork practices. Proc GROUP'07. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Malone, T. W. (2004). "The future of work: how the new order of business will shape your organization, your management style, and your life," Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts, 2004Google Scholar
- Mark, G., & Abrams, S. (2005): Differential interaction and attribution in collocated and distributed large-scale collaboration. 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-38 2005). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Massey, A., Montoya-Weiss, M., Hung, C. & Ramesh, V. (2001) When culture and style aren't about clothes: Perceptions of task-technology "fit" in global virtual teams. In Proceedings of the ACM 2001 Group Conference (pp. 207--213). NY: ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Morris, Michael W.; Peng, Kaiping. (1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 67(6) p.949--971.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nardi, B., Kuchinsky, A., Whittaker, S., Leichner, R. & Schwarz, H. (1996). Video-as-data: Technical and social aspects of a collaborative multimedia application. J. Computer-supported Cooperative Work, 4, 73--100. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Olson, G. M. & Olson, J. S. (2000) Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 139--178. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pettigrew, T. (1979). The ultimate attribution error: Extending Allport's cognitive analysis of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 461--476.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rogers, E. M. & Steinfatt, T. M. (1998). Intercultural Communication. Waveland Press.Google Scholar
- Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. NY: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
- Setlock, L. D., Fussell, S. R., & Neuwirth, C. (2004). Taking it out of context: Collaborating within and across cultures in face-to-face settings and via instant messaging. Proc. CSCW 2004 (pp. 604--613) Google ScholarDigital Library
- Setlock, L. D., Quinones, P. A., & Fussell, S. R. (2007). Does culture interact with media richness? The effects of audio vs. video conferencing on Chinese and American dyads. Proceedings of HICSS 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Short, J. A., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Storck, J., & Sproull, L. (1995). Through a glass darkly: What do people learn in videoconferences? Human Communication Research, 22, 197--219.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Straus, S. G., & McGrath, J. E. (1994). Does the medium really matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 87--97.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1986). "The social identity theory of intergroup behavior." In S. Worchel and W. G. Austin (Eds.), The psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 7--24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
- Tan, B. C. Y.,Wei, K.-K.,Watson, R. T., Clapper, D. L., & McLean, E. R. 1998. Computer-mediated communication and majority influence: Assessing the impact in an individualistic and a collectivistic culture. Management Science, 44: 1263--1278. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tanis, M. & Postmes, T. (2003). Social cues and impression formation in CMC. Journal of Communication, December 2003, 676--693.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
- Veinott, E., Olson, J., Olson, G. & Fu, X. (1999) Video helps remote work: Speakers who need to negotiate common ground benefit from seeing each other. In Proceedings of the CHI 1999 Conference on Human Computer Interaction (pp. 302--309). NY: ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Walther, J. B.(1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3--43.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wang, H. C., Kumar, R., Rosé, C. P., Li, T., & Chang, C. (2007). A hybrid ontology directed feedback generation algorithm for supporting creative problem solving dialogues. Proc. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wang, Z. (1994). Group attributional training as an effective approach to human resource development under team work systems. Ergonomics, 37, 1137--1144.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zhang, Q. P., Olson, G. M. & Olson, J. S. (2004) Does video matter more for long distance collaborators? Proceedings of XXVIII International Congress of PsychologyGoogle Scholar
Index Terms
- Where did we turn wrong?: unpacking the effect of culture and technology on attributions of team performance
Recommendations
Cultural difference and adaptation of communication styles in computer-mediated group brainstorming
CHI '09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsSupporting creativity via collaborative group brainstorming is a prevalent practice in organizations. Today's technology makes it easy for international and intercultural group members to brainstorm together remotely, but surprisingly little is known ...
Collaborating across cultural and technological boundaries: team culture and information use in a map navigation task
IWIC '09: Proceedings of the 2009 international workshop on Intercultural collaborationThe increased globalization of the workplace and the availability of collaboration technologies are making CMC a necessary aspect of teamwork [27]. Culturally diverse teams are becoming the norm in knowledge-intensive projects that involve making sense ...
Effects of instant messaging on the management of multiple project trajectories
CHI '04: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsWe present a study of the effects of instant messaging (IM) on individuals' management of work across multiple collaborative projects. Groups of four participants completed four web design tasks. Each participant worked on two tasks, each task with a ...
Comments