skip to main content
10.1145/1460563.1460627acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Public vs. private: comparing public social network information with email

Published: 08 November 2008 Publication History

Abstract

The goal of this research is to facilitate the design of systems which will mine and use sociocentric social networks without infringing privacy. We describe an extensive experiment we conducted within our organization comparing social network information gathered from various intranet public sources with social network information gathered from a private source - the organizational email system. We also report the conclusions of a series of interviews we conducted based on our experiment. The results shed light on the richness of public social network information, its characteristics, and added value over email network information.

References

[1]
Adamic, L. A., and Adar, E. Friends and neighbors on the Web, Social Networks, 25, 3 (2003), 211--230.
[2]
Alhalabi, W. S., Kubat, M., and Tapia, M. Search engine ranking efficiency evaluation tool. SIGCSE Bull. 39, 2 (2007), 97--101.
[3]
Aleman-Meza, B., Nagarajan, M., Ramakrishnan, C., Sheth, A., Arpinar, I., Ding, L., Kolari, P., Josi, A., and Finin, T. Semantic analytics on social networks: Experiences in addressing the problem of conflict of interest detection. Proc. WWW '06, ACM Press (2006), 407--416.
[4]
Bar-Yossef, Z., Guy, I., Lempel, R., Maarek, Y. S., and Soroka, V. 2007. Cluster ranking with an application to mining mailbox networks. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 14, 1 (Dec. 2007), 101--139.
[5]
Bird, C., Gourley, A., Devanbu, P., Gertz, M., and Swaminathan, A. Mining email social networks. In Proc. MSR (2006) 137--143.
[6]
Boykin, P. O. and Roychowdhury, V. Personal Email Networks: An Effective Anti-Spam Tool, IEEE Computer, V. 38, (2004), p 61.
[7]
Cormack, G. V., Lhotak, O., and Palmer, C. R. Estimating Precision by Random Sampling. In SIGIR'99, (1999), 273--274.
[8]
Cross, R., Parker, A. The Hidden Power of Social Networks: Understanding How Work Really Gets Done in Organizations, Harvard Business School Press (2004).
[9]
Culotta, A., Bekkerman, R., and McCallum, A. Extracting social networks and contact information from email and the Web. First Conference on Email and Anti-Spam (2004).
[10]
Danis, C., and Singer, D. A Wiki Instance in the Enterprise: Opportunities, Concerns and Reality. Proc. of CSCW'08, (2008).
[11]
Diaconis, P. Group Representation in Probability and Statistics, IMS Lecture Notes Monogr. Ser. 11, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Hayward, CA, (1988).
[12]
DiMicco, J. M., Millen, D. R. People Sensemaking with Social Networking Sites, The Sensemaking Workshop, CHI 2008, (2008).
[13]
Domingos, P. and Richardson, M. Mining the network value of customers. In Proc. KDD '01. ACM (2001), 57--66.
[14]
Dunbar, R. I. M. Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates, JHE 22 (1992), 469--493.
[15]
Fagin, R., Kumar, R., and Sivakumar, D. Comparing top k lists. SIAM JDM, (2003), 134--160.
[16]
Farnham, S., Portnoy, W., Turski, A., Cheng, L., and Vronay, D. Personal Map: Automatically modeling the user's online social network. Proc. INTERACT'03, IOS Press (2003), 567--574.
[17]
Farrell, S., Lau, T., Nusser, S., Wilcox, E., and Muller, M. Socially augmenting employee profiles with people-tagging. In Proc. UIST '07 (2007), 91--100.
[18]
Gladwell, M. The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. 2000.
[19]
Granovetter, M. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78, 6 (1973), 1360--1380.
[20]
Grippa F., Zilli A., Laubacher R., and Gloor P. E-mail may not reflect the social network, International Sunbelt Social Network Conference 2006.
[21]
Guy, I., Jacovi, M., Shahar, E., Meshulam, N., Soroka, V. Farrell, S. Harvesting with SONAR -- The Value of Aggregating Social Network Information. CHI 2008.
[22]
Hope, T., Nishimura, T., and Takeda, H. An integrated method for social network extraction. Proc. WWW '06, ACM Press (2006), 845--846.
[23]
Jackson, A., Yates, J., Orlikowski, W. Corporate Blogging: Building community through persistent digital talk. Proc. HICSS'07, (2007), p. 80.
[24]
Kautz, H., Selman, B., and Shah., M. ReferralWeb: Combining social networks and collaborative filtering. Communications of the ACM 40, 3 (1997), 63--65.
[25]
Kendall, M., and Gibbons, J. D. Rank Correlation Methods, Edward Arnold, London, 1990.
[26]
Lancaster, F. W., and Fayen, E. G. Information Retrieval On-Line. Melville Publishing Co. (1973), Chapter 6.
[27]
Lin, C.-Y., Griffiths-Fisher, V., Ehrlich, K., Desforges,C. SmallBlue: People Mining for Expertise Search and Social Network Analysis. IEEE Multimedia Magazine Oct.-Dec, (2007).
[28]
Losee, R. M., and Paris, L. A. H. Measuring Search Engine Quality and Query Difficulty: Ranking with Target and Freestyle. JASIS archive 2, 10 (1999), 882--889.
[29]
Mika, P. Flink: Semantic Web technology for the extraction and analysis of social networks. Journal of Web Semantics, 3, 2 (2005), 211--223.
[30]
Mika, P. Ontologies are us: A unified model of social networks and semantics. In Proc. ISWC2005, (2005).
[31]
Millen, D. R., Feinberg, J., and Kerr, B. Dogear: Social Bookmarking in the Enterprise. CHI 2006, April 22--27, 2006.
[32]
Nardi, B. A., Whittaker, S., Issacs, E., Creech, M., Johnson, J., and Hainsworth, J. Integrating communication and information through contact map. Communications of the ACM 45, 4 (2002), 89--95.
[33]
Neustaedter, C., Brush, A., Smith, M., and Fisher, D. The social network and relationship finder: Social sorting for email triage. In Proc. CEAS (2005).
[34]
Newman, M. E. J. Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. In Proc. of the National Academy of Science, USA, 101, (2004), 5200--5205.
[35]
O'Reilly, T. What is Web 2.0. 2005. http://www.oreillynet.com/go/web2.
[36]
Recordon, D. and Reed, D. OpenID 2.0: a platform for user-centric identity management. In Proc. of the Second ACM DIM (2006), 11--16.
[37]
Smith, M. Invisible crowds in cyberspace: Measuring and mapping the social structure of Usenet. In Communities in Cyberspace. Routledge Press, (1999).
[38]
Tyler, J. R., Wilkinson, D. M., and Huberman, B. A. Email as spectroscopy: Automated discovery of community structure within organizations. In Communities and Technologies, Huysman, M., Wenger, E., and V. Wulf, Eds. (2003), 81--96.
[39]
Viegas, F. B., Boyd, D., Nguyen, D. H., Potter, J., and Donath., J. Digital Artifacts for Remembering and Storytelling: PostHistory and Social Network Fragments. In Proc. HICSS'04 (2004). p 40109.1.
[40]
Waber, B. N., Olguin O., Daniel, K., Taemie, M., Akshay, A. K., and Pentland, A. Organizational Engineering Using Sociometric Badges. (2007).: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1073342 .
[41]
Wasserman, S., and Faust, K. Social Network Analysis. (1994).

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)People Recommendation on Social MediaSocial Information Access10.1007/978-3-319-90092-6_15(570-623)Online publication date: 3-May-2018
  • (2017)A user intention modeling algorithm for friend recommendation2017 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Big Data Analysis (ICBDA)(10.1109/ICBDA.2017.8078745(789-795)Online publication date: Mar-2017
  • (2016)What is Your Organization 'Like'?Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/2858036.2858540(3025-3037)Online publication date: 7-May-2016
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CSCW '08: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
November 2008
752 pages
ISBN:9781605580074
DOI:10.1145/1460563
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 08 November 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. data mining
  2. egocentric
  3. private
  4. public
  5. sna
  6. social network analysis
  7. social networks
  8. sociocentric

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

CSCW08
Sponsor:
CSCW08: Computer Supported Cooperative Work
November 8 - 12, 2008
CA, San Diego, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

CSCW '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)People Recommendation on Social MediaSocial Information Access10.1007/978-3-319-90092-6_15(570-623)Online publication date: 3-May-2018
  • (2017)A user intention modeling algorithm for friend recommendation2017 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Big Data Analysis (ICBDA)(10.1109/ICBDA.2017.8078745(789-795)Online publication date: Mar-2017
  • (2016)What is Your Organization 'Like'?Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/2858036.2858540(3025-3037)Online publication date: 7-May-2016
  • (2016)Embracing Cultural DiversityProceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing10.1145/2818048.2835198(274-287)Online publication date: 27-Feb-2016
  • (2015)Effect of Media Usage Selection on Social Mobilization Speed: Facebook vs E-MailPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.013481110:9(e0134811)Online publication date: 30-Sep-2015
  • (2014)Organizational Adoption of New Communication TechnologiesComputing Handbook, Third Edition10.1201/b16768-52(45-1-45-25)Online publication date: May-2014
  • (2014)The perception of othersProceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing10.1145/2531602.2531667(756-766)Online publication date: 15-Feb-2014
  • (2013)Mining expertise and interests from social mediaProceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web10.1145/2488388.2488434(515-526)Online publication date: 13-May-2013
  • (2013)The Longitudinal Use of SaNDVisIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2012.32219:7(1095-1108)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2013
  • (2013)Sharing Knowledge and ExpertiseComputer Supported Cooperative Work10.1007/s10606-013-9192-822:4-6(531-573)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2013
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media