skip to main content
10.1145/1463434.1463470acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Embedding and extending GIS for exploratory analysis of large-scale species distribution data

Published:05 November 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Exploratory analysis of large-scale species distribution data is essential to gain information and knowledge, stimulating hypotheses and seeking possible explanations of species distribution patterns. Geographical Information System (GIS) has played an important role in modeling and visualizing species distribution patterns for a single or a limited number of species. However, traditional GIS models do not take taxonomic components of species distribution data into consideration and are neither effective nor efficient in managing large-scale species distribution data.

In this study, we propose to embed and extend GIS for large scale species distribution data analysis. We provide an integrated data model that seamlessly links geographical, taxonomic and environmental data related to species distribution data analysis. We then present LEEASP (a Linked Environment for Exploratory Analysis of large-scale Species Distribution data), a prototype that has been developed based on the integrated data model. LEEASP utilizes the state-of-the-art advanced visualization techniques and multiple view coordination techniques to visualize different data sources that are relevant to species distribution data analysis. The North America tree species distribution data and other related data are used as an example to demonstrate the feasibility of the realization of the proposed integrated data model and how LEEASP can help users explore the geographical-taxonomic-environmental relationships

References

  1. Bisby, F. A., 2000. The quiet revolution: biodiversity informatics and the Internet, Science, 289(5488), pp. 2309--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Bongshin, L., Parr, C. S., et al., 2004. How users interact with biodiversity information using Taxon Tree. Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, pp. 320--327. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. COL (Catalogue of Life), 2007. http://www.catalogueoflife.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Edsall, R. M., 2003. The parallel coordinate plot in action: design and use for geographic visualization. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 43(4), pp. 605--619. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Erl, T., 2005. Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA): Concepts, Technology and Design: Prentice Hall PTR. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Frehner, M., Brandli, M., 2006. Virtual database: Spatial analysis in a Web-based data management system for distributed ecological data. Environmental Modelling & Software, 21(11), 1544--1554.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Godefroid, S., Rucquoij, S., et al., 2006. Spatial variability of summer microclimates and plant species response along transects within clearcuts in a beech forest. Plant Ecology 185(1), pp. 107--121.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Graham, M., Kennedy, J., 2005. Extending taxonomic visualisation to incorporate synonymy and structural markers. Information Visualization 4(3), pp. 206--223. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Graham, J., Simpson, A., Crall, A., Jarnevich, C., Newman, G., Stohlgren, T. J., 2008. Vision of a cyberinfrastructure for nonnative, invasive species management. Bioscience, 58(3), 263--268.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Guisan, A., Zimmermann, N. E., 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling 135(2--3), pp. 147--186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Guisan A., Thuiller, W., 2005. Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecology Letters 8(9), pp. 993--1009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Guralnick, R. P., Hill, A. W., Lane, M., 2007. Towards a collaborative, global infrastructure for biodiversity assessment. Ecology Letters, 10(8), 663--672.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Haining, R. Wise, S., Ma, J. S. 1998. Exploratory spatial data analysis in a geographic information system environment. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D-the Statistician, 47, 457--469.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Hargrove, W. W., Hoffman, F. M., 2004. Potential of multivariate quantitative methods for delineation and visualization of ecoregions. Environmental Management, 34, S39--S60.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S. E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P. G. Jarvis, A., 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology, 25(15), pp. 1965--1978. Also see http://www.worldclim.org/Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Hillis, D. M., Heath, T. A., et al., 2005. Analysis and visualization of tree space. Systematic Biology 54(3), pp. 471--482.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Ivan, H., Guy, M. et al, 2000. Graph Visualization and Navigation in Information Visualization: A Survey. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 6(1), pp. 24--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. ITIS, 2007. The Integrated Taxonomic Information System. http://www.itis.gov/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Jeffrey, H., Stuart, K. C. James, A. L., 2005. Prefuse: a toolkit for interactive information visualization. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. Portland, Oregon, USA, ACM Press. Also see http://www.prefuse.org/ Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Laihonen, P., Kalliola, R., Salo, J., 2004. The biodiversity information clearing-house mechanism (CHM) as a global effort. Environmental Science & Policy, 7(2), 99--108.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Loveland, T. R., Merchant, J. M., 2004. Ecoregions and ecoregionalization: Geographical and ecological perspectives. Environmental Management, 34, pp. S1--S13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Maceachren, A. M., Wachowicz, M., Edsall, R., Haug, D., Masters, R., 1999. Constructing knowledge from multivariate spatiotemporal data: integrating geographical visualization with knowledge discovery in database methods. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 13(4), 311--334.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B., Kent, J., 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403(6772), 853--858.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. NatureServe, 2007. http://www.natureserve.org/getData/animalData.jspGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Olson, D. M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, et al, 2001. Terrestrial ecoregions of the worlds: A new map of life on Earth. Bioscience, 51(11), 933--938.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Parr, C. S., Lee, B., et al, 2007. EcoLens: Integration and interactive visualization of ecological datasets. Ecological Informatics 2(1), pp. 61--69.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Pettorelli, N., Vik, J. O., et al, 2005. Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20(9), pp. 503--510.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Prasad, A. M., Iverson, L. R., 1999-ongoing. A Climate Change Atlas for 80 Forest Tree Species of the Eastern United States {database}. http://www.fs.fed.us/ne/delaware/atlas/index.html, Northeastern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Delaware, Ohio.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Sarkar, I. N., 2007. Biodiversity informatics: organizing and linking information across the spectrum of life. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 8(5), 347--357.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. uBio, 2007. Universal Biological Indexer and Organizer, http://www.ubio.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. USGS, 1999. Atlas of Relations Between Climatic Parameters and Distributions of Important Trees and Shrubs in North America, http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/p1650-a/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Vivid Solutions, 2004. Unified Mapping Platform (JUMP).http://www.vividsolutions.com/jump/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Wieczorek, J., Guo, Q. G. Hijmans, R. J., 2004. The point-radius method for georeferencing locality descriptions and calculating associated uncertainty. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 18(8), pp. 745--767.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Willig, M. R., Kaufman, D. M., et al, 2003. Latitudinal gradients of biodiversity: Pattern, process, scale, and synthesis, Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 34: 273--309.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Willis, K. J., Gillson, L., Knapp, S., 2007. Biodiversity hotspots through time: an introduction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 362(1478), 169--174.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Wood, J., Dykes, J., Slingsby, A., Clarke, K., 2007. Interactive visual exploration of a large spatio-temporal dataset: Reflections on a geovisualization mashup. Ieee Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 13(6), 1176--1183. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. WWF, 2006. World Wildlife Fund WildFinder: Online database of species distributions, ver. Jan-06. From http://www.worldwildlife.org/WildFinder.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang, J., Pennington. D., Liu, X., 2007, GBD-Explorer: Extending Open Source Java GIS for Exploring Ecoregion-Based Biodiversity Data, Ecological Informatics, 2(2), pp. 94--102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Embedding and extending GIS for exploratory analysis of large-scale species distribution data

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          GIS '08: Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGSPATIAL international conference on Advances in geographic information systems
          November 2008
          559 pages
          ISBN:9781605583235
          DOI:10.1145/1463434

          Copyright © 2008 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 5 November 2008

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate220of1,116submissions,20%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader