skip to main content
10.1145/1463689.1463755acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesidcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Broadening children's involvement as design partners: from technology to

Published:11 June 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Many existing studies discuss the participation of children as design partners in the development of technology. In this paper, we shift the focus from technology to experience, and propose to broaden the role of children to become experience designer partners. We exemplify our approach by discussing a case study in the educational domain. We conducted a contextual inquiry study in a local primary school for over three months, working with twenty four children aged 10--11 who used an online tool for cooperative hyperstorytelling. Our research shows that children of this age can participate in experience design not only as informants but also as co-designers. This intergenerational partnership brings a number of educational benefits to children involved in this process. It also suggests innovative solutions in the way technology can be exploited in an educational setting.

References

  1. Africano, D. et al. Designing Tangible Interfaces for Children's Collaboration. Proc. CHI 2004. Wien, ACM Press, 68--77. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Alben L. "Quality of Experience" Interactions, 13 (5), ACM Press, May--June 1996, 12--15 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Alborzi H. et al., Designing StoryRooms: Interactive Storytelling Spaces for Children. Proc. DIS'00, ACM Press Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Antle, A. Case Study:The Design of CB4Kids' Story Builder. Proc. IDC 2003, Preston, UK, ACM Press, 59--67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Austin H., Design for What?Six Dimensions of Activity. Interactions, Sept+Oct. 2000, ACM Press, 17--22 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bekker, M. et al. KidReporter: a User Requirements Gathering Technique for Designing with Children. In Interacting with Computers 15. Elsevier. 187--202.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Benford, S., et al. Designing Storytelling Technologies to Encourage Collaboration Between Young Children, Proc. CHI 2000, The Hague, NL; ACM Press, 236--245. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Cassel, J., Ryokoiai K., Making space for Voice: Technologies to support Children Fantasy and Storytelling. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 5 (3), Springer (2001) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Clayton L. Brand C., Cherry G., Rader C., Adapting User Interface Design Methods to the Design of Educational Activities. Proc. CHI 98 Los Angeles CA USA, ACM Press, 619--628 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Cobb P. Design Experiments in Educational Research, Educational Researcher, Vol. 32, No. 1, 9--13, 2003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Collins A., Ferguson W. Epistemic forms and epistemic games: Structures and strategies to guide inquiry. Educational Psychologist 28(1), 25--42, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Dalsgård P. Halskov K. Real Life Experiences with Experience Design. Proc. NordiCHI 2006, ACM Press, 331--340 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. DiSessa A. Changing minds: computer, learning, and literacy. MIT Press, 2001 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Di Blas, N., Poggi, C. 3D for Cultural Heritage and Education: Evaluating the Impact. In Selected Papers from Museums and the Web'06, D. Bearman and J Trant (eds.) - Albuquerque (NM), 2006Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Dindler, C. et al., Mission from Mars-A Method for Exploring User Requirements for Children in a Narrative Space. Proc. IDC 2005, Boulder, USA, ACM Press Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Druin A. Cooperative Inquiry: Developing New Technologies for Children with Children. Proc. ACM CHI '99 Pittsburgh PA USA, ACM Press, 592--599 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Druin, A. The Child as Learner, Critic, Inventor, and Technology Design Partner. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 12. Kluwer Academic Publishers. 2002, 189--213.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Druin A. et al. KidPad: A Design Collaboration Between Children, Technologists, and Educators. Proc. CHI' 97. Atlanta, GA, USA, ACM Press Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Druin A. et al. Designing a Digital Library for Young Children: An Intergenerational Partnership. In Proc. JCDL'01, Roanoke Virginia, USA, ACMPress, 398--405 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Forlizzi J., Battarbee K., Understanding Experience in Interactive Systems. Proc. DIS2004, Cambridge, Ma, USA ACM Press, 261--68 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Garzotto, F., Rizzo, F. Interactive Storytelling, Cooperative e-Learning, and Kids: a Field Study. In Proc. IDC'05, Boulder (CO)USA, ACM Press, 121--123.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Guha M. et al., Working with Young Children as Technology Design Partners, CACM Jan. 2005/Vol. 48, No. 1 39, 39--42 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Guha M. et al. Mixing Ideas: A New Technique for Working with Young Children as Design Partners. Proc. IDC 2004, College Park, Maryland, USA, ACM Press, 35--42 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Hanna L., Neapolitan D., Risden K. Evaluating Computer Game Concepts with Children. Proc. IDC 2004, College Park, Maryland, USA, ACM Press, 49--47 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Harel I., Papert S. Constructionism, Ablex Publishing Corporation, 1991Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Hourcade, J. P. Design for Children. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics (3rd ed.) (pp. 1446--1458). New York: Wiley, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Jason Li N. M. et al. Comicboarding: Using Comics as Proxies for Participatory Design with Children. Proc. CHI 2007, San Jose (CA), ACM Press, 1371--1375 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Jay M. Songs of Experience -- Modern American and European Variations on a Universal Theme, University of California Press, 2005Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Jensen, J., Skov, M. A Review of Research methods in Children's Technology Design. Proc. IDC 05 Boulder, USA 2005 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Kaplan N., Chisik Y., Levy D. Reading in the Wild: Sociable Literacy in Practice. Proc. IDC '06, Tampere, Finland, ACM Press, 2006, 97--115 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Kaplan N. et al., Summers K., Weeks H. Supporting Sociable Literacy in the International Children's Digital Library. Proc. IDC 2004, College Park, Maryland, USA, ACM Press, 89--97 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. V. Kaptelinin, Nardi B, Macaulay C., The Activity Checklist: A Tool for Representing the "Space" of Context, Interactions, Jul+Aug 1999, ACM Press, 27--30 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Kelly S. R. et al. Bluebells: A Design Method for Child-Centred Product Development. Proc. NordiCHI 2006, ACM Press, 362--369 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Marcus A., The Challenge of User Experience Design. Interactions, Nov+Dec 2002, 29--35 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Marshall, P., Rogers, Y., and Scaife, M. PUPPET: a virtual environment for children to act and direct interactive narratives. 2nd Int. Workshop on Narrative and Interactive Learning Environments, Edinburgh (UK) 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. McClellan I. User Experience' Design - A new form of design practice takes shape". Proc. CHI'05, Portland -- Oregon, April 2005, ACM Press, pp. 1097--1097 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Randell, C., Phelps, T., Rogers, Y. Ambient Wood: Demonstration of a digitally enhanced field trip for school children. In Adjunct Proceedings of UbiComp 2003, 100--104 (Seattle, USA, 2003)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Read, J. C., Gregory, P., MacFarlane, S. J., McManus, B., Gray P., Patel R. An Investigation of Participatory Design with Children - Informant, Balanced and Facilitated Design. Proc. IDC 2002, Eindhoven, NL, ACM Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Roussou M., Kavalieratou E., Doulgeridis M. Children Designers in the Museum: Applying Participatory Design for the Development of an Art Education Program. Proc. IDC '07, Aalborg, Denmark, ACM Press, 77--80 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Sasha A. B., Plucker J. A. Smart People or Smart Contexts? Cognition, Ability, and Talent Development in an Age of Situated Approaches to Knowing and Learning. Educational Psychologist, 37(3), 165--182, 2002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Scaife, M., Rogers, Y., Aldrich, F. Davies M. Designing For or Designing With? Informant Design for Interactive Learning Environments. Proc. CHI 97, Atlanta, ACM Press Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Sengers P., Boehner K., Davod S., Kaye J. Reflective Design. Proc. Critical Computing- CC '05, ACM Press, 2005, 49--58 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Sharples M., Corlett D., Westmancott O. The Design and Implementation of a Mobile Learning Resource. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing (2002) 6:220--234 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Stanton D. et al., Pridmore T. Classroom Collaboration in the Design of Tangible Interfaces for Storytelling. Proc. CHI 2001, Seattle, USA; ACM Press, 482--489 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Verhaegh J. et al. On the design of Camelot, an outdoor game for children. Proc. IDC '06, Tampere, Finland, ACM Press, 2006, 9--17 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Xu D., Mazzone E., MacFarlane, S. In search for evaluation methods for Children's tangible technology", Proc. IDC06, Tampere, Finland 2006, ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Werger E., Communities of Practice, Learning, Meaning, and Identity, University Cambridge Press, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. www.policultura.it/background.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Broadening children's involvement as design partners: from technology to

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            IDC '08: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Interaction design and children
            June 2008
            289 pages
            ISBN:9781595939944
            DOI:10.1145/1463689

            Copyright © 2008 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 11 June 2008

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate172of578submissions,30%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader