skip to main content
10.1145/1499224.1499284acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicicConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Sorry to interrupt: asian media preferences in cross-cultural collaborations

Published:20 February 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Laboratory studies of culture and computer-mediated communication have provided inconsistent results, in part due to differences in the tasks people were asked to do, the specific cultural backgrounds of participants, and the tools used for communication. We conducted an interview study in an effort to shed light on these inconsistent findings. The goal of the study was to understand when members of different cultures feel particular media (e.g., email, instant messaging, phone) are appropriate and to understand which medium they would chose for specific communication tasks. We discuss key themes from these interviews.

References

  1. Clark, H. H. & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, R. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.). Perspectives on socially shared cognition.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Cramton, C. D. & Hinds, P. J. (2005). Subgroup dynamics in internationally distributed teams: Ethnocentrism or cross-national learning? Research in Organizational Behavior, 26, 231--263Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Daft, R.L. & Lengel, R.H. (1984). Information richness: a new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design. In L. L. Cummings & B.M. Staw, (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior 6, (pp. 191--233). Homewood, IL: JAI Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Diamant, E. I., Fussell, S. R. & Lo, F-L. (2008). "Where did we turn wrong?" Unpacking the effects of culture and technology on attributions of team performance. Proceedings of CSCW 2008. NY: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Hall, E. 1976/1981. Beyond Culture. New York, NY: Doubleday/Anchor Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Li, H. Z. (1999a). Grounding and information communication in intercultural and intracultural dyadic discourse. Discourse Processes, 28, 195--215.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Macintyre, P., Clement, R., Dornyei, Z., Noels, K.A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 545--562.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Setlock, L. D., Fussell, S. R., & Neuwirth, C. (2004). Taking it out of context: Collaborating within and across cultures in face-to-face settings and via instant messaging. Proceedings of CSCW 2004 (pp. 604--613). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Veinott, E., Olson, J., Olson, G. & Fu, X. (1999) Video helps remote work: Speakers who need to negotiate common ground benefit from seeing each other. In Proceedings of CHI 1999 (pp. 302--309). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Wang, H-C., Fussell, S. R. & Setlock, L. D. (under review). Cultural difference and adaptation of communication styles in computer-mediated group brainstorming.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Whittaker, S. (2003). Theories and methods In Mediated Communication. In A. Graesser, M. Gernsbacher, and S. Goldman, (Eds.) The Handbook of Discourse Processes (pp. 243--286). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Sorry to interrupt: asian media preferences in cross-cultural collaborations

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        IWIC '09: Proceedings of the 2009 international workshop on Intercultural collaboration
        February 2009
        342 pages
        ISBN:9781605585024
        DOI:10.1145/1499224

        Copyright © 2009 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 20 February 2009

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate47of77submissions,61%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader