skip to main content
10.1145/1507509.1507520acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswsdmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Intentional query suggestion: making user goals more explicit during search

Published:09 February 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

The degree to which users' make their search intent explicit can be assumed to represent an upper bound on the level of service that search engines can provide. In a departure from traditional query expansion mechanisms, we introduce Intentional Query Suggestion as a novel idea that is attempting to make users' intent more explicit during search. In this paper, we present a prototypical algorithm for Intentional Query Suggestion and we discuss corresponding data from comparative experiments with traditional query suggestion mechanisms. Our preliminary results indicate that intentional query suggestions 1) diversify search result sets (i.e. it reduces result set overlap) and 2) have the potential to yield higher click-through rates than traditional query suggestions.

References

  1. Agichtein E., Lawrence S. and Gravano L. Learning search engine specific query transformations for question answering. In 'WWW '01: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on World Wide Web', ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 169--178, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Allan J. and Raghavan H. Using part-of-speech patterns to reduce query ambiguity. In 'Proceedings of the 25th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval', ACM Press New York, NY, USA, pp. 307--314, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Baeza-Yates R. and Ribeiro-Neto B. Modern Information Retrieval, AddisonWesley, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Baeza-Yates R., Hurtado C. A. and Mendoza M. Query recommendation using query logs in search engines. In Lindner W., Mesiti M., Türker C., Tzitzikas Y. and Vakali A., 'EDBT Workshops', Springer, pp. 588--596, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Baeza-Yates R., Calderón-Benavides L. and González-Caro C. The intention behind web queries. In String Processing and Information Retrieval, pp. 98--109, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Broder A. A taxonomy of web search. In ACM SIGIR Forum 36(2), pp. 3--10, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Chang Y., He, K., Yu S. and Lu, W. Identifying user goals from web search results. In 'WI '06: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence', IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 1038--1041, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Cohen, J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. In Educational and Psychological Measurement 20(1), 37, 1960.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Crabtree, D. W., Andreae, P. and Gao, X. Exploiting underrepresented query aspects for automatic query expansion. In 'KDD '07: Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining', ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 191--200, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Downey, D., Liebling, D. and Dumais, S. Understanding the relationship between searchers, queries and information goals. 'CIKM '08: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management', ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Ferber, R. Information Retrieval, Dpunkt.Verlag, ISBN 978-3898642132, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. He, K., Chang, Y. and Lu, W. Improving identification of latent user goals through search-result snippet classification. In 'WI '07: Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence', IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 683--686, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Jansen, B. J., Booth, D. L. and Spink, A. Determining the informational, navigational, and transactional intent of web queries. In Inf. Process. Manage. 44(3), pp. 1251--1266, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Jones, R., Rey, B., Madani, O. and Greiner, W. Generating query substitutions. In 'WWW '06: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on World Wide Web', ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 387--396, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Kang, I. and Kim, G. Query type classification for web document retrieval. In 'SIGIR '03: Proceedings of the 26th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval', ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 64--71, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kinney, K. A., Huffman, S. B. and Zhai, J. How evaluator domain expertise affects search result relevance judgments. In 'CIKM '08: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management', ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 591--598, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kraft, R. and Zien, J. Mining anchor text for query refinement. In 'WWW '04: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on World Wide Web', ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 666--674, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Lee, U., Liu, Z. and Cho, J. Automatic identification of user goals in web search. In 'WWW '05: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on World Wide Web', ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 391--400, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Liu, H. and Singh, P. 'ConceptNet --- A practicalc commonsense reasoning tool-kit'. In BT Technology Journal 22(4), pp. 211--226, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Ma, H., Yang, H., King, I. and Lyu, M. R. Learning latent semantic relations from clickthrough data for query suggestion. In 'CIKM '08: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management', ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 709--718, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Manning, C. D., Raghavan, P. and Schütze, H. Introduction to Information Retrieval, Cambridge University Press, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Mei, Q., Zhou, D. and Church, K. Query suggestion using hitting time. In 'CIKM '08: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management', ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 469--478, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Rose, D. E. and Levinson, D. Understanding user goals in web search. In 'WWW '04: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on World Wide Web', ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 13--19, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Strohmaier, M., Prettenhofer, P. and Lux, M. Different degrees of explicitness in intentional artifacts - studying user goals in a large search query log. In 'CSKGOI'08: Proceedings of the Workshop on Commonsense Knowledge and Goal Oriented Interfaces, in conjunction with IUI'08', Canary Islands, Spain, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Strohmaier, M., Prettenhofer, P. and Kröll, M. Acquiring explicit user goals from search query logs. In 'International Workshop on Agents and Data Mining Interaction ADMI' 08, in conjunction with WI '08', 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Strzalkowski, T. and Carballo, J. Natural Language Information Retrieval: TREC-5 Report. In 'Text REtrieval Conference', pp. 164--173, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Xu, J. and Croft, W. B. Query expansion using local and global document analysis. In 'SIGIR '96: Proceedings of the 19th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval', ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 4--1, 1996 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Intentional query suggestion: making user goals more explicit during search

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        WSCD '09: Proceedings of the 2009 workshop on Web Search Click Data
        February 2009
        95 pages
        ISBN:9781605584348
        DOI:10.1145/1507509

        Copyright © 2009 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 9 February 2009

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Upcoming Conference

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader