skip to main content
10.1145/1512714.1512753acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Quel outil d'évaluation de l'acceptabilité des nouvelles technologies pour des études francophones?

Published:02 September 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes the first step of a larger research concerning the establishment of a new technology acceptance model. Our final purpose aims at creating a French-speaking tool to evaluate intentions to use new systems. We wanted this tool to be constructed on the basis of an existing model, wherein we planed to incorporate an emotional dimension. Referring to the literature, we considered the TAM (Technology Acceptance Model, [3, 4]) as a reliable groundwork. We translated items into French and checked we recovered the factorial structure of TAM. We did this by assessing the intentions to use the digital work environment of the university. 192 students, registered for the first time in the university, constituted our sample. We ran the statistical analysis and then noted that we did not recover the original factorial structure of TAM. This result is surprising at first sight and is discussed in the last part. We conclude this paper by presenting the next steps of our research.

References

  1. Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organisational Behavior and Human Decision Process, Vol. 50, 1991, pp. 179--211.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Brangier, E., & Barcenilla, J. Concevoir un produit facile àà utiliser. Editions d'Organisation, Paris, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Davis, F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, No. 3, 1989, pp. 318--340.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, vol. 35, No. 8, 1989, pp. 982--1003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. Information systems success: The quest for the dependant variable. Information Systems Research, Vol. 3, No. 1, 1992, pp. 60--95.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Dillon, A., & Morris, M. G. Power, Perception and Performance: From usability engineering to technolgy acceptance with the P3 model of user response. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Conference of the Human Factirs and Ergonomics Society, CA: HFES, Santa Monica, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Février, F., Jamet, E., Rouxel, G., & Breton, G. Induction et éévaluation d'émotions en contexte de dialogue humain médiatisé par un ordinateur. Actes du colloque Epique, Nantes, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Hung, S. Y., & Chang, C. M. User acceptance of WAP services: Test of competing theories. Computer Standards & Interfaces, vol. 27, No. 4, 2005, pp. 359--370. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Hung, S. Y., Chang, C. M., & Yu, T. J. Determinants of user acceptance of e-Government services: The case of online tax filing and payment system. Government Information Quarterly, vol. 23, No. 1, 2006, pp. 97--112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Jamet, E., & Féévrier, F. Utilisabilité, utilité et acceptabilité des nouvelles technologies dans l'entreprise: une approche de psychologie ergonomique. In Méthodes et démarche d'analyse des usages des TIC en contexte professionnel, Editions de l'ANACT, Paris, (à paraître).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Jamet, E., Lemercier, C., & Féévrier, F. Evaluer l'utilisation d'un document a posteriori: les méthodes off-line. In A. Chevalier & A. Tricot (Eds.), Ergonomie Cognitive des Documents Electroniques, PUF, Paris, 2008, pp. 231--246.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, vol. 40, 2003, pp. 191--204. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Liaw, S. S., Chang, W. C., Hung, W. H., & Huang, H. M. Attitudes towards search engines as a learning assisted tool: Approach of Liaw and Huang's research model. Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 22, No. 2, 2006, pp. 177--190. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Luarn, P., & Lin, H. H. Toward an understanding of the behavioural intention to use mobile banking. Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 21, 2005, pp. 873--891.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. McFarland, D. J., & Hamilton, D. Adding contextual specificity to the technology acceptance model. Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 22, 2006, pp. 427--447. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Oliver, R. L. A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 17, 1980, pp. 460--469.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Tricot, A., Plégat-Soutjis, F., Camps, J. F., Amiel, A., Lutz, G., & Morcillo, A. Utilitéé, utilisabilité, acceptabilité: interpréter les relations entre trois dimensions de l'évaluation des EIAH. Actes du colloque Environnements Informatiques pour l'Apprentissage Humain, Strasbourg, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, vol. 27, No. 3, 2003, pp. 425--478. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Wu, J. H., Chen, Y. C., & Lin, L. M. Empirical evaluation of the revised end user computing acceptance model. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2007, pp. 162--174.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Yang, H. D., & Yoo, Y. It's all about attitude: revisiting the technology acceptance model. Decision Support Systems, Vol. 38, No. 1, 2004, pp. 19--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Quel outil d'évaluation de l'acceptabilité des nouvelles technologies pour des études francophones?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      IHM '08: Proceedings of the 20th Conference on l'Interaction Homme-Machine
      September 2008
      215 pages
      ISBN:9781605582856
      DOI:10.1145/1512714

      Copyright © 2008 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 September 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate103of199submissions,52%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader