skip to main content
10.1145/1518701.1519018acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Exploring awareness needs and information display preferences between coworkers

Published:04 April 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Technology makes it possible to share many different types of information with coworkers. We conducted a large-scale survey (N=549) to better understand current sharing among coworkers, how people stay aware of collocated and remote coworkers, and whether their willingness to share different types of awareness information changes based on the location in which the information is displayed. Contrary to our expectations, the display location did not greatly affect what respondents were willing to share. Our results also suggest considerations for researchers building situated displays, as respondents had concerns about unintended viewers and encouraging people to visit their personal space when they were not present.

References

  1. Dourish, P. and Bly, S. Portholes: Supporting awareness in a distributed work group. In Proc. CHI '92, ACM Press (1992), 541--547. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Fitton, D. Cheverst, K., Rouncefield, M., and Dix, A. Exploring adoption in the Hermes door display deployment. In Proc. UbiComp in the Office Workshop '07, Springer (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Huang, E. and Mynatt, E. Semi-public displays for small, co-located groups. In Proc. CHI '03, ACM Press (2003), 49--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Lederer, S., Mankoff, J., and Dey, A. Who wants to know what when? Privacy preference determinants in ubiquitous computing. In Extended abstracts of CHI '03, ACM Press (2003), 724--725. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. McCarthy, J., Costa, T., and Liongosari, E. UniCast, OutCast&GroupCast: Three steps toward ubiquitous, peripheral displays. In Proc. UbiComp '01, Springer (2001), 332--345. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. McEwan, G. and Greenberg, S. Supporting Social Worlds with the community Bar. In Proc. GROUP 2005, ACM Press (2005), 21--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Olson, J., Grudin, J., and Horvitz, E. Toward understanding preferences for sharing and privacy. Microsoft Research Technical Report MSR-TR-2004-138. Microsoft (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Sensenig, J., and Reed, T. Cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma as a function of interpersonal distance. Psychonomic Science, 26(2), 1972, 105--106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Exploring awareness needs and information display preferences between coworkers

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2009
        2426 pages
        ISBN:9781605582467
        DOI:10.1145/1518701

        Copyright © 2009 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 4 April 2009

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '09 Paper Acceptance Rate277of1,130submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        Upcoming Conference

        CHI '24
        CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 11 - 16, 2024
        Honolulu , HI , USA

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader