skip to main content
10.1145/1518701.1519046acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Tactile feedback for predictive text entry

Published:04 April 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Predictive text entry provides a fast way to enter text on phones and other small devices. Early work on predictive text entry highlighted that the reaction time for checking the screen dominates text entry times. Improving accuracy of predictions brings a downside: as prediction gets better, users will drop the slow operation of checking the screen and will thus miss prediction errors and system feedback/suggestions. In this note, we present an experiment into the use of vibration to alert the user when word completion is likely to aid them, using a dynamic approach based on their current typing speed, and when there are no dictionary matches to their entry. Results show significantly faster entry rates for users with vibration alerts, raising speeds from 20wpm to 23wpm once practiced.

References

  1. Akamatsu, M., MacKenzie, I. S., and Hasbrouq, T. "A comparison of tactile, auditory, and visual feedback in a pointing task using a mouse-type device," Ergonomics 38, 816--827, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Brewster, S.A., and Brown, L. M. "Tactons: structured tactile messages for non-visual information display," in AUIC '04, Darlinghurst, Australia, 15--23, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Brewster, S., Chohan, F., and Brown, L. "Tactile feedback for mobile interactions," in Proc. CHI '07, San Jose, USA, 159--162, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Card, S. K., Newell, A., and Moran, T. P., The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction,. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Clarkson, E., Clawson, J., Lyons, K., and Starner, T. "An empirical study of typing rates on mini-QWERTY keyboards," in CHI '05 extended abstracts, Portland, USA, 1288--1291, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Dunlop, M. D. and A. Crossan, "Predictive text entry methods for mobile phones," Personal Technologies 4(2), 134--143, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Dunlop, M. D., Glen, A., Motaparti, S., and Patel, S., "AdapTex: contextually adaptive text entry for mobiles," in Proc. MobileHCI '06, Espoo, Finland, 265--265, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Hasselgren, J., Montnemery, E., Nugues, P., and Svensson, M., "HMS: A Predictive Text Entry Method Using Bigrams," in Proc. Workshop on Language Modeling for Text Entry Methods, EACL 03, Budapest, Hungary, 43--49, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Hoggan, E., Brewster, S.A., and Johnston, J. "Investigating the effectiveness of tactile feedback for mobile touchscreens," in Proc. CHI '08, Florence, Italy, 1573--1582, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. James, C., and Reischel, K. "Text input for mobile devices: comparing model," in Proc. CHI '01, Seattle, USA, 365--371, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Lee, J. C., Dietz, P. H., Leigh, D., Yerazunis, W. S., and Hudson, S. E., "Haptic pen: a tactile feedback stylus for touch screens," in Proc. UIST '04, Santa Fe, USA, 291--294, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. MacKenzie, S., "Mobile text entry using three keys," in Proc. NordiCHI '02, Århus, Denmark, 2002, 27--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. MacKenzie, I. S., "Attention Demands in Text Entry Interfaces," in Efficient Text Entry, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. MacKenzie, I. S., and Soukoreff, R. W. "Phrase sets for evaluating text entry techniques," in CHI '03 extended abstracts, Lauderdale, USA, 754--755, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. MacKenzie, I. S., Zhang, X. S., and Soukoreff, R. W., "Text entry using soft keyboards," Behaviour&Information Technology 18(4), 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Pavlovych, A., and Stuerzlinger, W., "Model for non-expert text entry speed on 12-button phone keypads," in Proc. CHI '04, Vienna, Austria, 351--358, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Poupyrev, I., and Maruyama, S. "Tactile interfaces for small touch screens," in Proc. UIST '03, Vancouver, Canada, 217--220, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Tactile feedback for predictive text entry

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2009
      2426 pages
      ISBN:9781605582467
      DOI:10.1145/1518701

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 April 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '09 Paper Acceptance Rate277of1,130submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader