skip to main content
10.1145/1518701.1519064acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Understanding knowledge management practices for early design activity and its implications for reuse

Published:04 April 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Prior knowledge is a critical resource for design, especially when designers are striving to generate new ideas for complex problems. Systems that improve access to relevant prior knowledge and promote reuse can improve design efficiency and outcomes. Unfortunately, such systems have not been widely adopted indicating that user needs in this area have not been adequately understood. In this paper, we report the results of a contextual inquiry into the practices of and attitudes toward knowledge management and reuse during early design. The study consisted of interviews and surveys with professional designers in the creative domains. A novel aspect of our work is the focus on early design, which differs from but complements prior works' focus on knowledge reuse during later design and implementation phases. Our study yielded new findings and implications that, if applied, will help bring the benefits of knowledge management systems and reuse into early design activity.

References

  1. Ackerman, M.S. and McDonald, D.W. Answer Garden2: Merging Organizational Memory with Collaborative Help. Proc. CSCW, 1996, 97--105. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ahlberg, C. and Shneiderman, B. Visual Information Seeking Using the FilmFinder. Proc. CHI, 1994, 433--434. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Altmeyer, J. Reuse of Design Objects in CAD Framework. Proc. ICCAD, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bates, M.J. 1989. The Design of Browsing and Berrypicking Techniques for the Online Search Interface. Online Review, 13, 407--424.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Candy, L. 1997. Computers and Creativity Support: Knowledge, Visualisation and Collaboration. Knowledge-Based Systems, 10 (1): 3--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Conklin, E.J. and Burgess-Yakemovic, K. 1996. A Process-Oriented Approach to Design Rationale. Human-Computer Interaction, 6 (1991): 357--391. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Cosley, D. Frankowski, D., Terveen, L. and Riedl, J. Using Intelligent Task Routing and Contribution Review to Help Communities Build Artifacts of Lasting Value. Proc. CHI, 2006, 1037--1046. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Cross, N. Creative Cognition in Design: Processes of Exceptional Designers. Proc. Creativity&Cognition, 2002, 14--19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Cross, N. and Cross, A. 1995. Observations of Teamwork and Social Processes in Design. Design Studies, 16 (2): 143--170.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Cubranic, D., Murphy, G.C., Singer, J. and Booth, K.S. Learning from Project History: A Case Study for Software Development. Proc. CSCW, 2004, 82--91. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Cutrell, E., Dumais, S.T. and Teevan, J. 2006. Searching to Eliminate Personal Information Management. Communications of the ACM, 49 (1): 58--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Farzan, R. et al. Results from Deploying a Participation Incentive Mechanism within the Enterprise. Proc. CHI, 2008, 563--572. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Fogarty, J., Tan, D., Kapoor, A. and Winder, S. CueFlik: Interactive Concept Learning in Image Search. Proc. CHI, 2008, 29--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Grudin, J. 1994. Groupware and Social Dynamics: Eight Challenges for Developers. Communications of the ACM, 37 (1): 92--105. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Grudin., J. 1996. Evaluating Opportunities for Design Capture. Design Rationale: Concepts, Techniques, and Use, 453--470. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Herbsleb, J.D. and Kuwana, E. Preserving Knowledge in Design Projects: What Designers Need to Know. Proc. CHI, 2003, 7--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Herring, S., Chen, C., Krantzler, J. and Bailey, B.P. Getting Inspired! Understanding How and Why Examples Are Used in Creative Design Practice. Proc. CHI, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Hocevar, D. 1979. Measurement of Creativity: Review and Critique. Personality Assessment, 45 (5): 450--464.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Ju, W., Ionescu, A., Neeley, L. and Winograd, T. Where the Wild Things Work: Capturing Shared Physical Design Workspaces. Proc. CSCW, 2004, 533--541. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Klemmer, S.R., Thomsen, M., Phelps-Goodman, E., Lee, R. and Landay, J. A Where Do Web Sites Come From? Capturing and Interacting With Design History. Proc. CHI, 2002, 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Kolodner, J. 1991. Improving Human Decision Making Through Case-based Decision Aiding. AI magazine 12 (2): 52--68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Kuniavsky, M. and Raghavan, S. Guidelines are a Tool: Building a Design Knowledge Management System for Programmers. Proc. DUX, 2005, 18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Lugt, R.v.d. Functions of Sketching in Design Idea Generation Meetings. Proc. Creativity&Cognition, 2002, 72--79. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Maher, M.L., Balachandran, M.B. and Zhang, D.M. 1997. Case-based Reasoning in Design. IEEE Expert, 12 (2): 34--41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Newman, M.W. and Landay, J.A. Sitemaps, Storyboards, and Specifications: A Sketch of Web Site Design Practice. Proc. DIS, 2000, 263--274. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Ockerman, J.J. and Mitchell, C.M. 1999. Case-based Design Browser to Support Software Reuse: Theoretical Structure and Empirical Evaluation. Human-Computer Studies, 51(5): 865--893. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Pearce, M., Goel, A.K., Kolodner, J.L., Zimring, C., Sentosa, L. and Billington, R. 1992. Case-based Design Support: A Case Study in Architectural Design. IEEE Expert, 7 (5): 14--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Pirolli, P. and Card, S.K. 1999. Information Foraging. Psychological Review, 106 (4): 643--675.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Roy, R. 1993. Case Studies of Creativity in Innovative Product Development. Design Studies 14 (4): 423--443.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Schank, R.C. and Leake, D.B. 1989. Creativity and Learning in a Case-based Explainer. Artificial Intelligence, 40 (1-3): 353--385. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Shahin, T.M.M., Andrews, P.T.J. and Sivaloganathan, S. 1999. A Design Reuse System. Proc. of the Ins. of Mechanical Engineers Part B. Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 213 (6): 621--627.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Shneiderman, B. 2000. Creating Creativity: User Interfaces for Supporting Innovation. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7 (1): 114--138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Siemieniuch, C.E. and Sinclair, M.A. 2004. CLEVER: A process Framework for Knowledge Lifecycle Management. Operations and Production Management, 24 (11): 1104--1125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Sonnenwald, D.H. 1995. Contested Collaboration: A Descriptive Model of Intergroup Communication in Information System Design. Information Processing and Management, 31 (6): 859--877. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Sutton, R.I. and Hargadon, A. 1996. Brainstorming Groups in Context: Effectiveness in a Product Design Firm. Administrative Science Quarterly.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Terveen, L.G., SelPridge, P.G. and Long, M.D. 1995. Living Design Memory: Framework, Implementation, Lessons Learned. Human-Computer Interaction, 10 (1): 1--37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Tetzlaff, L. and Schwartz, D.R. The Use of Guidelines in Interface Design. Proc. CHI, 1991, 329--333. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Visser, W. 1995. Use of Episodic Knowledge and Information in Design Problem Solving. Design Studies, 16, 171--187.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Wolf, T.V., Rode, J.A., Sussman, J. and Kellogg, W.A. Dispelling "design" as the Black Art of CHI. Proc. CHI, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Zaychik, V. and Regli, W.C. 2003. Capturing Communication and Context in the Software Project Lifecycle. Research in Engineering Design, 14 (2): 75--88.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Understanding knowledge management practices for early design activity and its implications for reuse

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2009
        2426 pages
        ISBN:9781605582467
        DOI:10.1145/1518701

        Copyright © 2009 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 4 April 2009

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '09 Paper Acceptance Rate277of1,130submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        Upcoming Conference

        CHI '24
        CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 11 - 16, 2024
        Honolulu , HI , USA

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader