skip to main content
10.1145/1519130.1519134acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseurosysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Programmable temporal isolation in real-time and embedded execution environments

Published:31 March 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

We begin this paper with a wish list of features that we feel a modern real-time and embedded execution environment should offer. We then look at some of the key weaknesses of conventional real-time operating systems (RTOS) and limitations of virtual execution environments (VEE), which typically offer some of the features but not all in one system. We propose to remedy the problem by carefully combining, in a single virtualized execution environment, well-known operating systems and virtualization techniques with an efficient real-time scheduler, which we have recently developed. The scheduler enables temporal isolation of concurrently executing processes and allows to change guaranteed process execution speeds efficiently at any time during execution. We also report on preliminary experiments with a prototypical bare-metal implementation.

References

  1. L. Abeni, and Buttazzo, G. Resource reservation in dynamic real-time systems. Journal of Real-Time Systems 27, 2 (2004), 123--167. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Barham, P., Dragovic, B., Fraser, K., Hand, S., Harris, T., Ho, A., Neugebauer, R., Pratt, I., and Warfield, A. Xen and the art of virtualization. In Proc. SOSP (2003), ACM, pp. 164--177. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Buttazzo, G., and Bini, E. Optimal dimensioning of a constant bandwidth server. In Proc. RTSS (2006), IEEE, pp. 169--177. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Buttazzo, G. C. HARTIK: A real-time kernel for robotics applications. In Proc. RTSS (1993), IEEE, pp. 201--205.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Buttazzo, G. C. Rate monotonic vs. EDF: Judgment day. Real-Time Systems 29, 1 (2005), 5--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Cervin, A. Improved scheduling of control tasks. In Proc. ECRTS (1999), IEEE, pp. 4--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Cervin, A., and Eker, J. The Control Server: A computational model for real-time control tasks. In Proc. ECRTS (2003), IEEE, pp. 113--120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Chin, W.-N., Nguyen, H. H., Popeea, C., and Qin, S. Analysing memory resource bounds for low-level programs. In Proc. ISMM (2008), ACM, pp. 151--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Craciunas, S., Kirsch, C., Röck, H., and Sokolova, A. Real-time scheduling for workload-oriented programming. Tech. Rep. 2008-02, University of Salzburg, September 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Craciunas, S. S., Kirsch, C. M., Payer, H., Röck, H., Sokolova, A., Stadler, H., and Staudinger, R. The Tiptoe system, 2007. tiptoe.cs.uni-salzburg.at.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Craciunas, S. S., Kirsch, C. M., Payer, H., Sokolova, A., Stadler, H., and Staudinger, R. A compacting real-time memory management system. In Proc. ATC (2008), USENIX, pp. 349--362. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Craciunas, S. S., Kirsch, C. M., and Röck, H. I/O resource management through system call scheduling. SIGOPS Operating System Review 42, 5 (2008), 44--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Gai, P., Lipari, G., and di Natale, M. A flexible and configurable real-time kernel for time predictability and minimal RAM requirements. Tech. rep., Scuola Superiore S. Anna, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Heiser, G. The role of virtualization in embedded systems. In Proc. IIES (2008), ACM, pp. 11--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Jeffay, K., and Goddard, S. Rate-based resource allocation models for embedded systems. In Proc. EMSOFT (2001), Springer, pp. 204--222. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kopetz, H. Real-time Systems: Design Principles for Distributed Embedded Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Lipari, G., and Bini, E. A methodology for designing hierarchical scheduling systems. Journal of Embedded Computing 1, 2 (2005), 257--269. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Mercer, C. W., Savage, S., and Tokuda, H. Processor capacity reserves for multimedia operating systems. Tech. rep., Carnegie Mellon University, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Stadler, H. A virtualized real-time I/O subsystem. Master's thesis, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Stankovic, J. A., and Ramamritham, K. The design of the Spring kernel. In Proc. RTSS (1987), IEEE, pp. 146--157.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. VMware, Inc. Virtualization overview, 2006. www.vmware.com/pdf/virtualization.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Watson, J. Virtualbox: bits and bytes masquerading as machines. Linux Journal 2008, 166 (2008), 1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Wind River. RTLinux. www.windriver.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    IIES '09: Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Isolation and Integration in Embedded Systems
    March 2009
    45 pages
    ISBN:9781605584645
    DOI:10.1145/1519130

    Copyright © 2009 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 31 March 2009

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader