skip to main content
10.1145/1526709.1526805acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Behavioral profiles for advanced email features

Published:20 April 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

We examine the behavioral patterns of email usage in a large-scale enterprise over a three-month period. In particular, we focus on two main questions: (Q1) what do replies depend on? and (Q2) what is the gain of augmenting contacts through the friends of friends from the email social graph? For Q1, we identify and evaluate the significance of several factors that affect the reply probability and the email response time. We find that all factors of our considered set are significant, provide their relative ordering, and identify the recipient list size, and the intensity of email communication between the correspondents as the dominant factors. We highlight various novel threshold behaviors and provide support for existing hypotheses such as that of the least-effort reply. For Q2, we find that the number of new contacts extracted from the friends-of-friends relationships amounts to a large number, but which is still a limited portion of the total enterprise size. We believe that our results provide significant insights towards informed design of advanced email features, including those of social-networking type.

References

  1. L. Adamic and E. Adar. How to search a social network. Social Networks, 27(3):187--203, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. T. J. Allen and S. I. Cohen. Information Flow in Research and Development Laboratories. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14(1):12--19, 1969.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. J.-Y. L. Boudec. Performance Evaluation Lecture Notes. http://ica1www.epfl.ch/perfeval/lectureNotes.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. C. S. Campbell, P. P. Maglio, A. Cozzi, and B. Dom. Expertise Identification using Email Communication. In Proc. of CIKM 2003, pages 528--531, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. K. J. Delaney and V. Vara. Will Social Features Make Email Sexy Again? The Wall Street Journal, Oct. 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. B. Dom, I. Eiron, A. Cozzi, and Y. Zhang. Graph-based ranking algorithms for E-mail expertise analysis. In Proc. of the 8th ACM SIGMOD Workshop on Research Issues in Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, pages 42--48, San Diego, California, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J.-P. Eckmann, E. Moses, and D. Sergi. Entropy of dialogues creates coherent structures in e-mail traffic. In Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101:14333--14337, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. G. Kossinets, J. Kleinberg, and D. Watts. The structure of information pathways in a social communication network. In ACM SIGKDD, pages 435--443, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. G. Kossinets and D. Watts. Empirical analysis of an evolving social network. In Science, 311:88Ý U90, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. C. Neustaedter, A. J. B. Brush, and M. A. Smith. Beyond From and Received: Exploring the Dynamics of Email Triage. In Proc. of ACM CHI, 1977--1980, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. C. Neustaedter, A. J. B. Brush, M. A. Smith, and D. Fisher. The Social Network and Relationship Finder: Social Sorting for Email Triage. In Fifth Conference on Email and Anti-Spam, CEAS, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. M. F. Schwartz and D. C. M. Wood. Discovering Shared Interests Among People Using Graph Analysis of Global Electronic Mail Traffic. ACM Communications, 36(8):78--89, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. X. Shi, L. Adamic, and M. Strauss. Network of Strong Ties. Pysica A, 378(1):33--47, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. L. Sproull and S. Kiesler. Reducing Social Context Cues: Electronic Email in Organizational Communications. Management Science, 32(11):1492--1512, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. J. R. Tyler and J. C. Tang. When can i expect an email response? a study of rhythms in email usage. In Proc. of ECSCW, 239--258, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. J. R. Tyler, D. M. Wilkinson, and B. A. Huberman. Email as spectroscopy: automated discovery of community structure within organization. Communities and technologies, pages 81--96, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. G. D. Venoila, L. Dabbish, J. J. Cadiz, and A. Gupta. Supporting Email Workflow. Technical Report MSR-TR-2001-88, Microsoft Research, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. J. Zhang, M. S. Ackerman, and L. Adamic. Expertise Networks in Online Communities. In Proc. of WWW 2007, Banff, Alberta, Canada, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Behavioral profiles for advanced email features

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      WWW '09: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web
      April 2009
      1280 pages
      ISBN:9781605584874
      DOI:10.1145/1526709

      Copyright © 2009 IW3C2 org

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 20 April 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

      Upcoming Conference

      WWW '24
      The ACM Web Conference 2024
      May 13 - 17, 2024
      Singapore , Singapore

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader