skip to main content
article
Free Access

The experience of women in undergraduate computer science: what does the research say?

Published:01 June 1993Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

In recent years the discipline of computer science has become recognized as a male dominated field. Attempts have been made to encourage more women to participate but, have such efforts been supported or directed by the available research? This article presents a description of the current situation and reviews the existing body of research related to the undergraduate experience of women in computer science. Based on the research, some implications for computer science education are outlined. Suggestions are also given for further research needed to more completely describe the current situation and direct changes.

References

  1. Bernstein, D. R. (1991). Comfort and experience with computing: Are they the same for women and men? SIGCSE Bulletin, 23(3), 57-60, 64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Campbell, P. F., & McCabe, G. P. (1984). Predicting the success of freshmen in a computer science major. Communications of the ACM, 27(11), 1108-1113. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Clarke, V. A., & Chambers, S. M. (1989). Gender-based factors in computing enrollments and achievement: Evidence from a study of tertiary students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5(4), 409-429.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Harrington, S. M. (1990). Barriers to women in undergraduate computer science: The effects of the computer environment on the success and continuance of female students (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, 1990). Dissertation Abstracts International, 51/11A, 3711. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Jagacinski, C. M., LeBold, W. K., & Salvendy, G. (1988). Gender differences in persistence in computer-related fields. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4(2), 185-202.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Kersteen, Z. A., Linn, M. C., Clancy, M., & Hardyck, C. (1988). Previous experience and the learning of computer programming: The computer helps those who help themselves. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4(3), 321-333.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Kramer, P. E., & Lehman, S. (1990), Mismeasuring women: A critique of research on computer ability and avoidance. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 16, 158-172.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Lips, H. M., & Temple, L. (1990). Majoring in computer science: Causal models for women and men. Research in Higher Education, 31(1), 99-113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Miura, I. T. (1987). The relationship of computer self-efficacy expectations to computer interest and course enrollment in college. Sex Roles, 16(5/6), 303-311.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Ogozalek, V. Z. (1989). A comparison of male and female computer science students' attitudes toward computers. SIGCSE Bulletin, 21(2), 8-14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Rasmussen, B., & Håpnes, T. (1991). Excluding women from the technologies of the future? A case study of the culture of computer science. Futures, 23, 1107-1119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Sproull, L., Kiesler, S., & Zubrow, D. (1987). Encountering an alien culture. In S. Kiesler & L. Sproull (Eds.), Computing and change on campus (pp. 173-194). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Sproull, L., Zubrow, D., & Kiesler, S. (1986). Cultural socialization to computing in college. Computers in Human Behavior, 2(4), 257-275.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Teague, J., & Clarke, V. (1991). Fiction and fact: Students' and professionals' perceptions of women in computer science. In A. Lehto and I. Eriksson (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Women, Work and Computerization (pp. 377-390). Helsinki: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Turkle, S. (1984). The second self: Computers and the human spirit. New York: Simon and Schuster. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Turkle, S. (1988). Computational reticence: Why women fear the intimate machine. In C. Kramarae (Ed.), Technology and women's voices: Keeping in touch (pp. 41-61). New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ware, N. C., Steckler, N. A., & Leserman, J. (1985). Undergraduate women: Who chooses a science major? Journal of Higher Education, 56(1), 73-84.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Widnall, S. E. (1988). AAAS presidential lecture: Voices from the pipeline. Science, 241, 1740- 1745.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. The experience of women in undergraduate computer science: what does the research say?

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM SIGCSE Bulletin
        ACM SIGCSE Bulletin  Volume 25, Issue 2
        June 1993
        65 pages
        ISSN:0097-8418
        DOI:10.1145/152751
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 1993 Author

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 June 1993

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader