skip to main content
10.1145/1529282.1529611acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Automatic discovery of technology trends from patent text

Authors Info & Claims
Published:08 March 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Patent text is a rich source to discover technological progresses, useful to understand the trend and forecast upcoming advances. For the importance in mind, several researchers have attempted textual-data mining from patent documents. However, previous mining methods are limited in terms of readability, domain-expertise, and adaptability. In this paper, we first formulate the task of technological trend discovery and propose a method for discovering such a trend. We complement a probabilistic approach by adopting linguistic clues and propose an unsupervised procedure to discover technological trends. Based on the experiment, our method is promising not only in its accuracy, 77% in R-precision, but also in its functionality and novelty of discovering meaningful technological trends.

References

  1. R. Nallpati. Semantic language models for topic detection and tracking. In Proceedings of the conference of the North American chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology (HLT-NAACL'03), 2003, pages 1--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Q. Mei and C. Zhai. A mixture model for contextual text mining. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data mining (KDD'06), 2006, pages 649--655. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. B. Lent, R. Agrawal, and R. Srikant. Discovering trends in text databases. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data mining (KDD'97), 1997, pages 227--230.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. A. Porter and D. Jhu. Technological mapping for management of technology. In Proceedings of International Symposium on Technology, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. W. Pottenger and T. Yang. Detecting emerging concepts in textual data mining. Computational Information Retrieval, 2001, pages 1--17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. B. Yoon, and Y. Park. A text mining-based patent network: analytical tool for high-technology trend. Journal of High Technology Management Research, Vol. 15 (1), 2004, pages 37--50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Y. Kim, J. Suh, and S. Park. Visualization of patent analysis for emerging technology. Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 34 (3), 2007, pages 1804--1812. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. K. Ahmad and A. Al-Thubaity. Can text analysis tell us something about technology progress? In Proceedings of the ACL-03 workshop on patent corpus processing, 2003, pages 41--45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. L. Wanner, et al. Towards content-oriented patent document processing. World Patent Information, Vol. 30 (1), 2007, pages 21--33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. D. Klein and C. Manning. Accurate unlexicalized parsing. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'03), 2003, pages 423--430. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. Shinmori, M. Okumura, Y. Marukawa, and M. Iwayama. Patent claim processing for readability: structure analysis and term explanation. In Proceedings of the ACL-03 workshop on patent corpus processing, 2003, pages 56--65. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. T. Takaki, A. Fujii, and T. Ishikawa. Associative document retrieval by query subtopic analysis and its application to invalidity patent search. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM International conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM '04), 2004, pages 399--406. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. H. Itoh, H. Mano, and Y. Ogawa, Term distillation in patent retrieval. In Proceedings of the ACL-03 workshop on patent corpus processing, 2003, pages 41--45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. C. Koster, M. Seutter and J. Beney. Multi-Classification of Patent Applications with winnow. In Proceedings PSI 2003, 2003, pages 545--554.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. K. Lai, and S. Wu. Using the patent co-citation approach to establish a new patent classification system. Information Processing and Management, Vol. 41, 2005, pages 313--330. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. A. Chakrabarti, I. Dror, and N. Eakabuse. Interorganizational transfer of knowledge: An analysis of patent citations of a defense firm. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 40 (1), 1993, pages 91--94.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Automatic discovery of technology trends from patent text

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SAC '09: Proceedings of the 2009 ACM symposium on Applied Computing
        March 2009
        2347 pages
        ISBN:9781605581668
        DOI:10.1145/1529282

        Copyright © 2009 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 8 March 2009

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader