skip to main content
10.1145/1529282.1529642acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Management of requirements in ERP development: a comparison between proprietary and open source ERP

Published:08 March 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Identification and specification of business requirements are extremely important when development of Enterprise Resource Planning systems (ERPs) take place. It can be stated that this is still a problematic area not well researched and, as a result from that, it does not exist much guidance on how to deal with requirements. In this paper we discuss if existing problems of requirements management are the same or if they differ according to the type of development: closed source (proprietary) or open source ERP. The reason is that it is possible that these two approaches can promote each other in how to improve the first phase in ERP development. From the discussion about similarities and differences between the two approaches it is suggested further research in this area that could end up in some more practical guidelines on how to do the requirements definition so that the finally developed ERPs better support adopters' needs.

References

  1. Shehab, E. M., Sharp, M. W., Supramaniam, L., and Spedding, T. A., Enterprise resource planning: An integrative review. Business Process Management Journal, 10, 4 (2004), 359--386.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Esteves, J. and Pastor, J., Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Research: An Annotated Bibliography. Communications of AIS, 7, 8 (2001), 1--51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Botta-Genoulaz, V., Millet, P. A., and Grabot, B., A survey on the recent research literature on ERP systems. Computers in Industry, 56, 6 (2005), 510--522. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Soh, C., Kien, S. S., and Tay-Yap, J., Cultural fits and misfits: Is ERP a universal solution? Communications of the ACM, 43, 4 (2000), 47--51. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Askenäs, L. and Westelius, A. Five roles of an information system: a social constructionist approach to analyzing the use of ERP systems. in twenty first international conference on Information systems. 2000. Brisbane, Queensland, Australia: Association for Information Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Sleeper, S. Z. AMR analysts discuss role-based ERP interfaces - the user-friendly enterprise. 2004 {cited 12-04-2007}; Available from: http://www.sapdesignguild.org/editions/edition8/print_amr.asp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jackson, M., Software requirements & Specifications: a lexicon of practice, principles and prejudices. 1995, London: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Jackson, M., The meaning of requirements. Annals of Software Engineering, 3, 1 (1997), 5--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Power, N. M., A grounded theory of requirements documentation in the practice of software development, in School 2002, Dublin City University: Dublin. 223.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. IEEE, IEEE STD 830--1998: IEEE recommended practice for software requirements specifications. 1998, Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society PressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Robertson, S. and Robertson, J., Mastering the requirements process. 1999, Harlow, UK: Addison Wesley. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Zave, P. and Jackson, M., Four dark corners of requirements engineering. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 6, 1 (1997), 1--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Wiegers, K. E., Software Requirements. Vol. 2nd ed. 2003, Redmond, Washington: Microsoft Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Odeh, M. and Kamm, R., Bridging the gap between business models and system models. Information and Software Technology, 45, 15 (2003), 1053--1060.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Daneva, M. and Wieringa, R., Cost estimation for cross-organizational ERP projects: research perspectives. Software Quality Journal, (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Monnerat, R. M., de Carvalho, R. A., and de Campos, R., Enterprise systems modeling: the ERP5 development process, in Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on Applied computing. 2008, ACM: Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Carvalho, R. A., Issues on evaluating Free/open source ERP sysyems, in Research and Practical Issues of Enterprise Informations Systems 2007, Springer Verlag New York Inc: New York. 667--676.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Carvalho, R. A., Costa, H. G., and Xu, N., A Risk Based Method for Open Source Software Adoption Evaluation, in XIII CLAIO - Congreso Latino-Iberoamericano de Investigación Operativa. 2006: Montevideo, Uruguay.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Johansson, B., Pain points challenges for future enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, in 3gERP workshop. 2007: Copenhagen.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Johansson, B., Developing a "better" ERP system: The risk of loosing competitive advantage, in Research and practical issues of enterprise information systems II, L. Xu, A. M. Tjoa, and S. Chaudbry, Editors. 2007, IFIP Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Boulanger, A., Open-source versus proprietary software: Is one more reliable and secure than the other? IBM Systems Journal, 44, 2 (2005), 239--248. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Evans, E. Domain-Driven Design Tackling Complexity in the Heart of Software. Addison-Wesley, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Management of requirements in ERP development: a comparison between proprietary and open source ERP

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SAC '09: Proceedings of the 2009 ACM symposium on Applied Computing
      March 2009
      2347 pages
      ISBN:9781605581668
      DOI:10.1145/1529282

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 March 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader