skip to main content
10.1145/1529282.1529671acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Alternatives to conjunctive query processing in peer-to-peer file-sharing systems

Published:08 March 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Peer-to-peer file-sharing systems suffer from the over-specification of query results due to the fact that query processing is conjunctive and the descriptions of shared files are sparse. Ultimately, longer queries, which should yield more accurate results, do the opposite. To alleviate this problem, we consider alternative means of query processing. That is, results are sent from the server to the client only if they are deemed relevant based on cosine similarity. Based on our results, these alternatives can increase query accuracy by 40% at virtually no cost.

References

  1. D. Grossman, O. Frieder. Information Retrieval: Algorithms and Heuristics. Springer, 2nd ed., 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. K. Nakauchi, Y. Ishikawa, H. Morikawa, and T. Aoyama. Peer-to-peer keyword search using keyword relationship. In Proc. Wkshp. Global and Peer-to-Peer Comp. Large Scale Dist. Sys (GP2PC), 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M. Nilsson. Id3v2 web site. www.id3.org. 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. I. Muslea and T. J. Lee. Online Query Relaxation via Bayesian Causal Structures Discovery. In Proc. AAAI, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. C. Rohrs. Keyword matching {in gnutella}. Technical report, LimeWire, Dec. 2000. www.limewire.org/techdocs/KeywordMatching.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. S. Saroiu, P. K. Gummadi, S. D. Gribble. A measurement study of peer-to-peer file sharing systems. In Proc. Multimed Comp. and Netw. (MMCN), 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. M. T. Schlosser, T. E. Condie, and S. D. Kamvar. Simulating a file-sharing p2p network. In Proc. Wkshp. Semantics in Peer-to-Peer and Grid Comp., 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. I. Stoica, R. Morris, D. Karger, F. Kaashoek, and H. Balakrishnan. Chord: A scalable peer-to-peer lookup service for internet applications. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. C. Tang, Z. Xu, S. Dwarkadas. Peer-to-peer information retrieval using self-organizing semantic overlay networks. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM, Aug. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. W. G. Yee, L. T. Nguyen, and O. Frieder. Masked Queries for Search Accuracy in Peer-to-Peer File-Sharing Systems. In Proc. IEEE IPDPS, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. J. Lu and J. Callan. User modeling for full-text federated search in peer-to-peer networks. In Proc. ACM SIGIR, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. Xu and W. B. Croft. Improving the effectiveness of information retrieval with local context analysis. ACM Trans. Info. Sys. 18(1), Jan., 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. H. V. Jagadish, B. C. Ooi, K.-L. Tan, Q. H. Vu, R. Zhang. Speeding up search in peer-to-peer networks with a multi-way tree structure. In Proc. ACM SIGMOD, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. W.-T. Balke, W. Nejdl, W. Siberski, U. Thaden. Progressive Distributed Top k Retrieval in Peer-to-Peer Networks. In Proc. ICDE, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. G. Skobeltsyn, T. Luu, I. Podnar Zarko, M. Rajman, K. Aberer: Web text retrieval with a P2P query-driven index. SIGIR 2007: 679--686. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. P. Godfrey, Minimization in Cooperative Response to Failing Database Queries, International Journal of Cooperative Information System (IJCIS), World Scientific, 6(2):95--149, June 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. IIT P2P Information Retrieval System Web Site. www.ir.iit.edu/~waigen/pirs.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Alternatives to conjunctive query processing in peer-to-peer file-sharing systems

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SAC '09: Proceedings of the 2009 ACM symposium on Applied Computing
      March 2009
      2347 pages
      ISBN:9781605581668
      DOI:10.1145/1529282

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 March 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader